The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance
Abstract
Abstract The amount of data extracted from production processes has increased exponentially due to the proliferation of sensing technologies. When processed and analyzed, data can bring out valuable information and knowledge from manufacturing process, production system and equipment. In industries, equipment maintenance is an important key, and affects the operation time of equipment and its efficiency. Thus, equipment faults need to be identified and solved, avoiding shutdown in the production processes. Machine Learning (ML) methods have been emerged as a promising tool in Predictive Maintenance (PdM) applications to prevent failures in equipment that make up the production lines in the factory floor. However, the performance of PdM applications depends on the appropriate choice of the ML method. The aim of this paper is to present a systematic literature review of ML methods applied to PdM, showing which are being explored in this field and the performance of the current state-of-the-art ML techniques. This review focuses on two scientific databases and provides a useful foundation on the ML techniques, their main results, challenges and opportunities, as well as it supports new research works in the PdM field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0016973 · Cited by 2,583
Machine Learning approach for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0
Paolanti, M., Romeo, L., Felicetti, A., Mancini, A., Frontoni, E., & Loncarski, J. (2018) · 2018 14th IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA) · doi:10.1109/mesa.2018.8449150 · Cited by 296
Cited by
Borges, A. F. S., Laurindo, F. J. B., Spínola, M. M., Gonçalves, R. F., & Mattos, C. A. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102225 · Cited by 760
Cioffi, R., Travaglioni, M., Piscitelli, G., Petrillo, A., & De Felice, F. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12020492 · Cited by 717
Theissler, A., Pérez-Velázquez, J., Kettelgerdes, M., & Elger, G. (2021) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.107864 · Cited by 581
On Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0: Overview, Models, and Challenges
Achouch, M., Dimitrova, M., Ziane, K., Sattarpanah Karganroudi, S., Dhouib, R., Ibrahim, H., & Adda, M. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12168081 · Cited by 528
Cheng, J. C. P., Chen, W., Chen, K., & Wang, Q. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103087 · Cited by 520
Metadata
- Authors
- Carvalho, T. P., Soares, F. A. A. M. N., Vita, R., Francisco, R. D. P., Basto, J. P., & Alcalá, S. G. S.
- Venue
- Computers & Industrial Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 137
- Pages
- 106024
- ISSN
- 0360-8352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2972137370
- Cited by
- 1,576
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106024
- The paper
- Carvalho, T. P., Soares, F. A. A. M. N., Vita, R., Francisco, R. D. P., Basto, J. P., & Alcalá, S. G. S. (2019). A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.