The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Sentiment Analysis: Approaches, Datasets, and Future Research
Open accessAbstract
Sentiment analysis is a critical subfield of natural language processing that focuses on categorizing text into three primary sentiments: positive, negative, and neutral. With the proliferation of online platforms where individuals can openly express their opinions and perspectives, it has become increasingly crucial for organizations to comprehend the underlying sentiments behind these opinions to make informed decisions. By comprehending the sentiments behind customers’ opinions and attitudes towards products and services, companies can improve customer satisfaction, increase brand reputation, and ultimately increase revenue. Additionally, sentiment analysis can be applied to political analysis to understand public opinion toward political parties, candidates, and policies. Sentiment analysis can also be used in the financial industry to analyze news articles and social media posts to predict stock prices and identify potential investment opportunities. This paper offers an overview of the latest advancements in sentiment analysis, including preprocessing techniques, feature extraction methods, classification techniques, widely used datasets, and experimental results. Furthermore, this paper delves into the challenges posed by sentiment analysis datasets and discusses some limitations and future research prospects of sentiment analysis. Given the importance of sentiment analysis, this paper provides valuable insights into the current state of the field and serves as a valuable resource for both researchers and practitioners. The information presented in this paper can inform stakeholders about the latest advancements in sentiment analysis and guide future research in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SemEval-2017 Task 4: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter
Rosenthal, S., Farra, N., & Nakov, P. (2017) · Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017) · doi:10.18653/v1/s17-2088 · Cited by 870
Sentiment Analysis Based on Deep Learning: A Comparative Study
Dang, N. C., Moreno-García, M. N., & De la Prieta, F. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9030483 · Cited by 593
Jang, B., Kim, M., Harerimana, G., Kang, S.-U., & Kim, J. W. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10175841 · Cited by 442 · cited 1×
“Jang et al. (2020) [34] improved on the hybrid CNN and BiLSTM model by incorporating an attention mechanism.”
RoBERTa-LSTM: A Hybrid Model for Sentiment Analysis With Transformer and Recurrent Neural Network
Tan, K. L., Lee, C. P., Anbananthen, K. S. M., & Lim, K. M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3152828 · Cited by 354
Self-citationSystematic reviews in sentiment analysis: a tertiary study
Ligthart, A., Catal, C., & Tekinerdogan, B. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-09973-3 · Cited by 303
A CNN-BiLSTM Model for Document-Level Sentiment Analysis
Rhanoui, M., Mikram, M., Yousfi, S., & Barzali, S. (2019) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make1030048 · Cited by 300
Transformer-based deep learning models for the sentiment analysis of social media data
Tabinda Kokab, S., Asghar, S., & Naz, S. (2022) · Array · doi:10.1016/j.array.2022.100157 · Cited by 237
Sentiment Analysis Using Naive Bayes Algorithm Of The Data Crawler: Twitter
Wongkar, M., & Angdresey, A. (2019) · 2019 Fourth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) · doi:10.1109/icic47613.2019.8985884 · Cited by 228
Evaluation of Deep Learning Techniques in Sentiment Analysis from Twitter Data
Goularas, D., & Kamis, S. (2019) · 2019 International Conference on Deep Learning and Machine Learning in Emerging Applications (Deep-ML) · doi:10.1109/deep-ml.2019.00011 · Cited by 196
Sentiment Analysis With Ensemble Hybrid Deep Learning Model
Tan, K. L., Lee, C. P., Lim, K. M., & Anbananthen, K. S. M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3210182 · Cited by 191
Self-citation
Cited by
Content Analysis Using Specific Natural Language Processing Methods for Big Data
Pirnau, M., Botezatu, M. A., Priescu, I., Hosszu, A., Tabusca, A., Coculescu, C., & Oncioiu, I. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13030584 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, K. L., Lee, C. P., & Lim, K. M.
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-04-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4550
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4362558246
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 26.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Sentiment Analysis: Approaches, Datasets, and Future Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/app13074550
- The paper
- Tan, K. L., Lee, C. P., & Lim, K. M. (2023). A Survey of Sentiment Analysis: Approaches, Datasets, and Future Research. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074550
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.