Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sentiment Analysis Using Naive Bayes Algorithm Of The Data Crawler: Twitter

Wongkar, Meylan, Angdresey, Apriandy·2019·2019 Fourth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)

Abstract

Sentiment analysis is an activity carried out to see the level of public sentiment or public opinion relating to goods or services and even a figure, both political and celebrity figures. In this study, a sentiment analysis application for twitter analysis was conducted on 2019 Republic of Indonesia presidential candidates, using the python programming language. There are several steps taken to conduct this sentiment analysis, which is to collect data using libraries in python, text processing, testing training data, and text classification using the Naïve Bayes method. The Naïve Bayes method is used to help classify classes or the level of sentiments of society. The results of this study found that the value of the positive sentiment polarity of the Jokowi-Ma'ruf Amin pair was 45.45% and a negative value of 54.55%, while the Prabowo-Sandiaga pair received a positive sentiment score of 44.32% and negative 55.68%. Then the combined data was tested from the training data used for each presidential candidate and get an accuracy of 80.90% ≈ 80.1%. In this study a comparison was carried out using the naïve bayes, svm and K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) methods which were tested using RapidMiner by producing a naïve bayes accuracy value of 75.58%, svm accuracy value of 63.99% and K-NN accuracy value of 73.34%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icic47613.2019.8985884

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Wongkar, M., & Angdresey, A.
Venue
2019 Fourth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
1-5
OpenAlex
W3006588007
Cited by
228
References
0
FWCI
9.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sentiment Analysis Using Naive Bayes Algorithm Of The Data Crawler: Twitter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icic47613.2019.8985884
The paper
Wongkar, M., & Angdresey, A. (2019). Sentiment Analysis Using Naive Bayes Algorithm Of The Data Crawler: Twitter. 2019 Fourth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC). https://doi.org/10.1109/icic47613.2019.8985884

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.