The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sentiment Analysis Using Naive Bayes Algorithm Of The Data Crawler: Twitter
Abstract
Sentiment analysis is an activity carried out to see the level of public sentiment or public opinion relating to goods or services and even a figure, both political and celebrity figures. In this study, a sentiment analysis application for twitter analysis was conducted on 2019 Republic of Indonesia presidential candidates, using the python programming language. There are several steps taken to conduct this sentiment analysis, which is to collect data using libraries in python, text processing, testing training data, and text classification using the Naïve Bayes method. The Naïve Bayes method is used to help classify classes or the level of sentiments of society. The results of this study found that the value of the positive sentiment polarity of the Jokowi-Ma'ruf Amin pair was 45.45% and a negative value of 54.55%, while the Prabowo-Sandiaga pair received a positive sentiment score of 44.32% and negative 55.68%. Then the combined data was tested from the training data used for each presidential candidate and get an accuracy of 80.90% ≈ 80.1%. In this study a comparison was carried out using the naïve bayes, svm and K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) methods which were tested using RapidMiner by producing a naïve bayes accuracy value of 75.58%, svm accuracy value of 63.99% and K-NN accuracy value of 73.34%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Survey of Sentiment Analysis: Approaches, Datasets, and Future Research
Tan, K. L., Lee, C. P., & Lim, K. M. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13074550 · Cited by 303
Sentiment analysis in e-commerce platforms: A review of current techniques and future directions
Huang, H., Zavareh, A. A., & Mustafa, M. B. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3307308 · Cited by 117
Machine Learning Methods in Smart Lighting Toward Achieving User Comfort: A Survey
Putrada, A. G., Abdurohman, M., Perdana, D., & Nuha, H. H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3169765 · Cited by 101
“The naive Bayes classification formula is as follows where x is the data with an unknown class, c is the hypothetical data of a particular class, and P ( c | x ) is the posterior probability c based on x [190].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Wongkar, M., & Angdresey, A.
- Venue
- 2019 Fourth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-10
- Pages
- 1-5
- OpenAlex
- W3006588007
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sentiment Analysis Using Naive Bayes Algorithm Of The Data Crawler: Twitter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icic47613.2019.8985884
- The paper
- Wongkar, M., & Angdresey, A. (2019). Sentiment Analysis Using Naive Bayes Algorithm Of The Data Crawler: Twitter. 2019 Fourth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC). https://doi.org/10.1109/icic47613.2019.8985884
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.