Cited by 4Gynecological conditions and treatmentsReproductive System and PregnancyReproductive Health and Contraception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monitoring Contractility of Junctional Zone Endometrium across Menstrual Cycle Using the ElectroUteroGraph (EUG): A Clinical Evaluation

Open access

Abstract

(1) Background: Abnormal uterine contractility for nonpregnant women has been associated with gynecological pathologies and infertility. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of a novel monitoring technique to assess the contractility of the nongravid uterus using a simple, standardized, direct, in vivo methodology during the different phases of the menstrual cycle. (2) Methods: Twenty-six healthy women of reproductive age (28–48 years) were recruited. An ElectroUteroGraph (EUG) was used to measure the electrical activity from the contractility of the junctional zone endometrium (JZE) across the menstrual cycle. Derived recordings were separated into the early proliferative (EP) (n = 10), late proliferative (LP) (n = 31), early luteal (EL) (n = 27), and late luteal (LL) (n = 12) phases of the menstrual cycle. EUG recordings were performed by inserting a flexible electrode array into the endometrial cavity. (3) Results: Waveforms that were measured from the electrode closer to the fundus (1 cm distance) were processed. The Root-Mean-Square (RMS) Voltage Amplitude (VJZE-RMS) (in μV) and the Mean Frequency (fJZE-mean) (in cycles/min) of the JZE’s electrical activity, as direct indicators of the intensity and frequency changes in the JZE’s contractions, were extracted from the recorded waveforms. There was a trend in the median values of the VJZE-RMS decreasing from the EP to the LP phase (247–158 μV). During the EL phase, an upward trend was observed (158–374 μV, p < 0.05), reaching its highest value during the LL phase (374–477 μV, p < 0.05) when compared to the LP phase. The fJZE-mean showed the opposite trend, increasing from 2.5 cycles/min during the EP phase to 2.96 cycles/min during the LP phase. During the EL phase, a downward trend was observed (2.96–2.37 cycles/min), continuing to fall to 1.33 cycles/min, in the LL phase, with p < 0.05 when compared to the previous three phases. (4) Conclusions: The novel in vivo monitoring technique has shown clinically, for the first time, significant electrical activity differences in the different sub-phases of the menstrual cycle, recorded in a safe and painless way.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app14020546

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Novel techniques such as the ElectroUteroGraph (EUG) and computer-assisted tissue imaging analysis (CATIA) show promising results in monitoring uterine contractility and pathologies affecting tissue histology.

    “Novel techniques such as the ElectroUteroGraph (EUG) and computer-assisted tissue imaging analysis (CATIA) show promising results in monitoring the uterine contractility and pathologies affecting tissue histology.”

    From Malignancy in Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: Is There a Way to Avoid It? A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says the EUG shows promise for assessing uterine physiology and reports measurements of contractility across the menstrual cycle in healthy, parous, nonpregnant women. The paper does not address CATIA or its use to assess pathologies affecting tissue histology. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tanos, V., Tanos, P., & Georgiou, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nicosia (CY)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
Corresponding author
Tanos, Panayiotis
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-01-08
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
546
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390662787
Cited by
4
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
European Union (GRAND/1221/0115)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
uterine contractility, menstrual cycle phases, non-pregnant uterus, luteal phase, proliferative phase, contraction frequency, infertility, electrode arrays, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review