Cited by 30

Analysis of Learning Behaviors and Outcomes for Students with Different Knowledge Levels: A Case Study of Intelligent Tutoring System for Coding and Learning (ITS-CAL)

Lai, Chien-Hung, Lin, Cheng-Yueh·2025·Applied Sciences

Abstract

With the rapid development of generative AI technology, programming learning aids have become essential resources for enhancing students’ programming capabilities. This study developed an intelligent tutoring system, ITS-CAL, powered by a large language model (LLM) to provide students with immediate and hierarchical learning feedback, particularly in scenarios with limited class time and large student populations. The system helps students overcome challenges encountered during the learning process. A mixed-method approach, combining quantitative and qualitative analyses, was employed to investigate the usage patterns of the system’s three primary functions—Hint, Debug, and User-defined Question—and their impact on learning outcomes among students with varying knowledge levels. The results indicated that students with high knowledge levels tended to use the Hint and User-defined Question functions moderately, while those with lower knowledge levels heavily relied on the Hint function but did not achieve significant improvements in learning outcomes. Overall, students who used ITS-CAL in moderation achieved the highest pass rate (72.22%), whereas excessive reliance on ITS-CAL appeared to diminish independent problem-solving abilities. Additionally, students generally provided positive feedback on the system’s convenience and its role as a learning aid. However, they highlighted areas for improvement, particularly in the Debug function and the quality of Hint content. This study contributes to the field by demonstrating the application potential of LLMs in programming education and offering valuable empirical insights for designing future programming learning assistance systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app15041922

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lai, C.-H., & Lin, C.-Y.
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-02-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
1922
ISSN
2076-3417
Cited by
30
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review