Cited by 155Machine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesMining and Industrial ProcessesFault Detection and Control Systems

AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance in Mining: A Systematic Literature Review on Fault Detection, Digital Twins, and Intelligent Asset Management

Open access
Rojas, Luis, Peña, Álvaro, Garcia, José·2025·Applied Sciences

Abstract

The mining industry faces increasing challenges in maintaining high production levels while minimizing unplanned failures and operational costs. Critical assets, such as crushers, conveyor belts, mills, and ventilation systems, operate under extreme conditions, leading to accelerated wear and failure risks. Traditional maintenance strategies often fail to prevent unexpected downtimes, safety hazards, and economic losses. As a response, industries are integrating predictive monitoring technologies, including machine learning, the Internet of Things, and digital twins, to enhance early fault detection and optimize maintenance strategies. This Systematic Literature Review analyzes 166 high-impact studies from Scopus and Web of Science, identifying key trends in fault detection algorithms, hybrid AI models, and real-time monitoring techniques. The findings highlight the increasing adoption of deep learning, reinforcement learning, and digital twins for anomaly detection and process optimization. Additionally, AI-driven methods are improving sensor-based data acquisition and asset management, extending equipment lifecycles while reducing failures. Despite these advancements, challenges such as data standardization, model scalability, and system interoperability persist, requiring further research. Future work should focus on real-time AI applications, explainable models, and academia-industry collaboration to accelerate the implementation of intelligent maintenance solutions, ensuring greater reliability, efficiency, and sustainability in mining operations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app15063337

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Werner Kritzinger et al. propose a framework categorizing DTs into three distinct subcategories: digital model, digital shadow, and Digital Twin.

    “This classification is illustrated in Figure 5, where Werner Kritzinger et al. [97] propose a framework categorizing DTs into three distinct subcategories: digital model, digital shadow, and Digital Twin.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rojas, L., Peña, Á., & Garcia, J.
Affiliations
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL)
  • Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile
Corresponding author
Rojas, Luis
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-03-19
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
3337
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408654588
Cited by
155
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 50
FWCI
11.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Mining and Industrial Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
predictive maintenance, mining industry, fault detection, digital twin, anomaly detection, deep learning, reinforcement learning, Internet of Things, real-time monitoring, equipment failure, sensor data acquisition, maintenance strategy optimization, explainable models, interoperability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review