AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance in Mining: A Systematic Literature Review on Fault Detection, Digital Twins, and Intelligent Asset Management
Open accessAbstract
The mining industry faces increasing challenges in maintaining high production levels while minimizing unplanned failures and operational costs. Critical assets, such as crushers, conveyor belts, mills, and ventilation systems, operate under extreme conditions, leading to accelerated wear and failure risks. Traditional maintenance strategies often fail to prevent unexpected downtimes, safety hazards, and economic losses. As a response, industries are integrating predictive monitoring technologies, including machine learning, the Internet of Things, and digital twins, to enhance early fault detection and optimize maintenance strategies. This Systematic Literature Review analyzes 166 high-impact studies from Scopus and Web of Science, identifying key trends in fault detection algorithms, hybrid AI models, and real-time monitoring techniques. The findings highlight the increasing adoption of deep learning, reinforcement learning, and digital twins for anomaly detection and process optimization. Additionally, AI-driven methods are improving sensor-based data acquisition and asset management, extending equipment lifecycles while reducing failures. Despite these advancements, challenges such as data standardization, model scalability, and system interoperability persist, requiring further research. Future work should focus on real-time AI applications, explainable models, and academia-industry collaboration to accelerate the implementation of intelligent maintenance solutions, ensuring greater reliability, efficiency, and sustainability in mining operations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Werner Kritzinger et al. propose a framework categorizing DTs into three distinct subcategories: digital model, digital shadow, and Digital Twin.
“This classification is illustrated in Figure 5, where Werner Kritzinger et al. [97] propose a framework categorizing DTs into three distinct subcategories: digital model, digital shadow, and Digital Twin.”
From Analysis of Digital Twin Applications in Energy Efficiency: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [97]
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
Real time hybrid medical image encryption algorithm combining memristor-based chaos with DNA coding
Demirkol, A. S., Sahin, M. E., Karakaya, B., Ulutas, H., Ascoli, A., & Tetzlaff, R. (2024) · Chaos, Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114923 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysis of Digital Twin Applications in Energy Efficiency: A Systematic Review
Ba, L., Tangour, F., El Abbassi, I., & Absi, R. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17083560 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rojas, L., Peña, Á., & Garcia, J.
- Affiliations
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL)
- Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile
- Corresponding author
- Rojas, Luis
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-03-19
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3337
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4408654588
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 105 · 2025: 50
- FWCI
- 11.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Mining and Industrial Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Keywords
- predictive maintenance, mining industry, fault detection, digital twin, anomaly detection, deep learning, reinforcement learning, Internet of Things, real-time monitoring, equipment failure, sensor data acquisition, maintenance strategy optimization, explainable models, interoperability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review