Cited by 4Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyMedication Adherence and ComplianceHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

The Role of Psychosocial Interventions in Increasing Adherence to Tuberculosis Treatment in People Belonging to Socially Vulnerable Categories

Open access
Munteanu, Ioana, Kalambayi, Fidelie, Toth, Alexandru, Dendrino, Dragos, Burdusel, Beatrice, Vlasceanu, Silviu-Gabriel, Parliteanu, Oana, Dragomir, Antonela +2 more·2025·Applied Sciences

Abstract

The article analyzes the effects of psychosocial interventions on adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment among vulnerable populations in Romania. The study includes 4104 patients from disadvantaged groups (rural, injecting drug users, homeless), beneficiaries of a national multidisciplinary support program. Multivariate analyses conducted on drug-susceptible TB (DS-TB) patients within this cohort identified some predictors of therapeutic success, such as extrapulmonary diagnosis, peer-to-peer educational support, and a higher level of education. At the same time, men, occupationally inactive people and those in the initial phase of treatment at project entry showed lower adherence. The results support the integration of psychosocial interventions in TB management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app15158173

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A scoping review is timely because the End TB Strategy and the WHO mhGAP framework have explicitly called for integration of mental health and psychosocial care into TB programs, while the number of primary trials and qualitative studies in this area has expanded substantially over the past five years.

    “A scoping review is particularly timely now because the End TB Strategy [13] and the WHO mhGAP framework [17] have explicitly called for the integration of mental health and psychosocial care into TB programs, while the number of primary trials and qualitative studies in this area has expanded substantially over the past five years [18,19,20,21].”

    From Psychosocial Interventions for Improving Treatment Adherence in Tuberculosis Patients: A Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Approaches. (2026) · cites this paper as [19]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multicomponent interventions combining psychological support, education, and material or social assistance have apparent value for addressing multidimensional adherence barriers.

    “The multidimensional nature of adherence barriers is also reflected in the apparent value of multicomponent interventions combining psychological support, education, and material or social assistance [16,19,36].”
  • Socially vulnerable groups, such as people who inject drugs and people experiencing homelessness, have markedly poorer treatment outcomes.

    “The markedly poorer treatment outcomes reported among socially vulnerable groups, such as people who inject drugs and people experiencing homelessness [19], suggest that generalized support models may be insufficient for populations facing layered forms of disadvantage.”
  • Pragmatic implementation research involves trade-offs: real-world relevance may increase, while causal certainty remains limited when control groups are absent.

    “More broadly, studies such as Munteanu et al. [19] illustrate the trade-offs typical of pragmatic implementation research: real-world relevance may increase, while causal certainty remains limited when control groups are absent.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munteanu, I., Kalambayi, F., Toth, A., Dendrino, D., Burdusel, B., Vlasceanu, S.-G., Parliteanu, O., Dragomir, A., Nemes, R. M., & Mahler, B.
Affiliations
  • Titu Maiorescu University (RO)
  • University of Bucharest (RO)
  • Romanian Angel Appeal Foundation, 030956 Bucharest, Romania
  • Pneumology Department, Marius Nasta Institute of Pneumology, 050159 Bucharest, Romania
  • Cardio-Thoracic Department, Marius Nasta Institute of Pneumology, 050159 Bucharest, Romania
  • Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 021251 Bucharest, Romania
  • Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
  • Institutul de Pneumoftiziologie "Marius Nasta" (RO)
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-07-23
Volume
15
Issue
15
Pages
8173
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412595832
Cited by
4
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
tuberculosis, medication adherence, psychosocial interventions, socially vulnerable populations, drug-susceptible tuberculosis, people who inject drugs, homelessness, rural patients, peer support, predictors of treatment success, Romania

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review