The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tunable-Q Wavelet Transform Based Multiscale Entropy Measure for Automated Classification of Epileptic EEG Signals
Open accessAbstract
This paper analyzes the underlying complexity and non-linearity of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals by computing a novel multi-scale entropy measure for the classification of seizure, seizure-free and normal EEG signals. The quality factor (Q) based multi-scale entropy measure is proposed to compute the entropy of the EEG signal in different frequency-bands of interest. The Q -based entropy (QEn) is computed by decomposing the signal with the tunable-Q wavelet transform (TQWT) into the number of sub-bands and estimating K-nearest neighbor (K-NN) entropies from various sub-bands cumulatively. The optimal selection of Q and the redundancy parameter (R) of TQWT showed better robustness for entropy computation in the presence of high- and low-frequency components. The extracted features are fed to the support vector machine (SVM) classifier with the wrapper-based feature selection method. The proposed method has achieved accuracy of 100% in classifying normal (eyes-open and eyes-closed) and seizure EEG signals, 99.5% in classifying seizure-free EEG signals (from the hippocampal formation of the opposite hemisphere of the brain) from seizure EEG signals and 98% in classifying seizure-free EEG signals (from the epileptogenic zone) from seizure EEG signals, respectively, using the SVM classifier. We have also achieved classification accuracies of 99% and 98.6% in classifying seizure versus non-seizure EEG signals and the individual three classes, namely normal, seizure-free and seizure EEG signals, respectively. The performance measure of the proposed multi-scale entropy has been found to be comparable with the existing state of the art epileptic EEG signals classification methods studied using the same database.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Bhattacharyya, A., Sharma, M., Pachori, R. B., Sircar, P., & Acharya, U. R. (2018) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2646-4 · Cited by 204
Self-citationRetractedCortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Wrappers for feature subset selection
Kohavi, R., & John, G. H. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00043-x · Cited by 8,947
Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy
Richman, J. S., & Moorman, J. R. (2000) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.6.h2039 · Cited by 7,880
Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity.
Pincus, S. M. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.6.2297 · Cited by 5,811
Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy
Lin, J. (1991) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.61115 · Cited by 5,140
Permutation Entropy: A Natural Complexity Measure for Time Series
Bandt, C., & Pompe, B. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.174102 · Cited by 4,867
Kraskov, A., Stögbauer, H., & Grassberger, P. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.69.066138 · Cited by 3,512
Multiscale Entropy Analysis of Complex Physiologic Time Series
Costa, M., Goldberger, A. L., & Peng, C.-K. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.068102 · Cited by 3,207
Cited by
Acharya, U. R., Oh, S. L., Hagiwara, Y., Tan, J. H., & Adeli, H. (2018) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.09.017 · Cited by 1,647
Self-citationAn automated system for epilepsy detection using EEG brain signals based on deep learning approach
Ullah, I., Hussain, M., Qazi, E.-U.-H., & Aboalsamh, H. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.021 · Cited by 622
Epileptic Seizures Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review
Shoeibi, A., Khodatars, M., Ghassemi, N., Jafari, M., Moridian, P., Alizadehsani, R., Panahiazar, M., Khozeimeh, F., Zare, A., Hosseini-Nejad, H., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18115780 · Cited by 459
Self-citationMachine learning and deep learning approach for medical image analysis: diagnosis to detection
Rana, M., & Bhushan, M. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-14305-w · Cited by 365
A Comprehensive Review on Synergy of Multi-Modal Data and AI Technologies in Medical Diagnosis
Xu, X., Li, J., Zhu, Z., Zhao, L., Wang, H., Song, C., Chen, Y., Zhao, Q., Yang, J., & Pei, Y. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11030219 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhattacharyya, A., Pachori, R., Upadhyay, A., & Acharya, U.
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-04-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 385
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2606301878
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 18.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tunable-Q Wavelet Transform Based Multiscale Entropy Measure for Automated Classification of Epileptic EEG Signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/app7040385
- The paper
- Bhattacharyya, A., Pachori, R., Upadhyay, A., & Acharya, U. (2017). Tunable-Q Wavelet Transform Based Multiscale Entropy Measure for Automated Classification of Epileptic EEG Signals. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7040385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.