Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 459

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 160 of the 160 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epileptic Seizures Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review

Open access
Shoeibi, Afshin, Khodatars, Marjane, Ghassemi, Navid, Jafari, Mahboobeh, Moridian, Parisa, Alizadehsani, Roohallah, Panahiazar, Maryam, Khozeimeh, Fahime, Zare, Assef, Hosseini-Nejad, Hossein, Khosravi, Abbas, Atiya, Amir F., Aminshahidi, Diba, Hussain, Sadiq, Rouhani, Modjtaba, Nahavandi, Saeid, Acharya, Udyavara Rajendra·2021·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

A variety of screening approaches have been proposed to diagnose epileptic seizures, using electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities. Artificial intelligence encompasses a variety of areas, and one of its branches is deep learning (DL). Before the rise of DL, conventional machine learning algorithms involving feature extraction were performed. This limited their performance to the ability of those handcrafting the features. However, in DL, the extraction of features and classification are entirely automated. The advent of these techniques in many areas of medicine, such as in the diagnosis of epileptic seizures, has made significant advances. In this study, a comprehensive overview of works focused on automated epileptic seizure detection using DL techniques and neuroimaging modalities is presented. Various methods proposed to diagnose epileptic seizures automatically using EEG and MRI modalities are described. In addition, rehabilitation systems developed for epileptic seizures using DL have been analyzed, and a summary is provided. The rehabilitation tools include cloud computing techniques and hardware required for implementation of DL algorithms. The important challenges in accurate detection of automated epileptic seizures using DL with EEG and MRI modalities are discussed. The advantages and limitations in employing DL-based techniques for epileptic seizures diagnosis are presented. Finally, the most promising DL models proposed and possible future works on automated epileptic seizure detection are delineated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph18115780

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 160 references

Cited by

See all 459

Metadata

Authors
Shoeibi, A., Khodatars, M., Ghassemi, N., Jafari, M., Moridian, P., Alizadehsani, R., Panahiazar, M., Khozeimeh, F., Zare, A., Hosseini-Nejad, H., Khosravi, A., Atiya, A. F., Aminshahidi, D., Hussain, S., Rouhani, M., Nahavandi, S., & Acharya, U. R.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-05-27
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
5780
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3165430704
Cited by
459
References
160
FWCI
34.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epileptic Seizures Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijerph18115780
The paper
Shoeibi, A., Khodatars, M., Ghassemi, N., Jafari, M., Moridian, P., Alizadehsani, R., Panahiazar, M., Khozeimeh, F., Zare, A., Hosseini-Nejad, H., Khosravi, A., Atiya, A. F., Aminshahidi, D., Hussain, S., Rouhani, M., Nahavandi, S., & Acharya, U. R. (2021). Epileptic Seizures Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115780

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.