The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BNMI-DINA: A Bayesian Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Enhanced Personalized Learning
Abstract
In the field of education, cognitive diagnosis is crucial for achieving personalized learning. The widely adopted DINA (Deterministic Inputs, Noisy And gate) model uncovers students’ mastery of essential skills necessary to answer questions correctly. However, existing DINA-based approaches overlook the dependency between knowledge points, and their model training process is computationally inefficient for large datasets. In this paper, we propose a new cognitive diagnosis model called BNMI-DINA, which stands for Bayesian Network-based Multiprocess Incremental DINA. Our proposed model aims to enhance personalized learning by providing accurate and detailed assessments of students’ cognitive abilities. By incorporating a Bayesian network, BNMI-DINA establishes the dependency relationship between knowledge points, enabling more accurate evaluations of students’ mastery levels. To enhance model convergence speed, key steps of our proposed algorithm are parallelized. We also provide theoretical proof of the convergence of BNMI-DINA. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach effectively enhances model accuracy and reduces computational time compared to state-of-the-art cognitive diagnosis models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling
Conati, C., Gertner, A., & VanLehn, K. (2002) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1023/a:1021258506583 · Cited by 493
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Templin, 2006, Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models, Psychol. Methods, 11, 287, 10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.287 · DOI
- Wang, 2023, Dynamic Cognitive Diagnosis: An Educational Priors-Enhanced Deep Knowledge Tracing Perspective, IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., 16, 306, 10.1109/TLT.2023.3254544 · DOI
- Liu, 2023, New development of cognitive diagnosis models, Front. Comput. Sci., 17, 171604, 10.1007/s11704-022-1128-3 · DOI
- Luo, J., and Hubaux, J.P. (2006). Embedded Security in Cars: Securing Current and Future Automotive IT Applications, Springer.
- 2009, DINA model and parameter estimation: A didactic, J. Educ. Behav. Stat., 34, 115, 10.3102/1076998607309474 · DOI
- Wafa, 2023, Consistency and Ability of Students Using DINA and DINO Models, Eur. J. Math. Stat., 4, 7, 10.24018/ejmath.2023.4.4.230 · DOI
- Frederiksen, N., Mislevy, R.J., and Bejar, I.I. (2012). Test Theory for a New Generation of Tests, Routledge. · DOI
- Nichols, P.D., Chipman, S.F., and Brennan, R.L. (2012). Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment, Routledge. · DOI
- Leighton, J., and Gierl, M. (2007). Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment for Education: Theory and Applications, Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- Lee, 2009, Cognitive diagnosis approaches to language assessment: An overview, Lang. Assess. Q., 6, 172, 10.1080/15434300902985108 · DOI
- Li, 2016, The selection of cognitive diagnostic models for a reading comprehension test, Lang. Test., 33, 391, 10.1177/0265532215590848 · DOI
- Yang, 2023, Cognitive diagnosis-based personalized exercise group assembly via a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell., 7, 829, 10.1109/TETCI.2022.3220812 · DOI
- Qi, 2023, ICD: A new interpretable cognitive diagnosis model for intelligent tutor systems, Expert Syst. Appl., 215, 119309, 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119309 · DOI
- Ma, 2023, Predicting Student Performance in Future Exams via Neutrosophic Cognitive Diagnosis in Personalized E-learning Environment, IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., 16, 680, 10.1109/TLT.2023.3240931 · DOI
- Gao, W., Wang, H., Liu, Q., Wang, F., Lin, X., Yue, L., Zhang, Z., Lv, R., and Wang, S. (2023, January 23–27). Leveraging Transferable Knowledge Concept Graph Embedding for Cold-Start Cognitive Diagnosis. Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Taipei, Taiwan. · DOI
- Wang, S., Zeng, Z., Yang, X., and Zhang, X. (2023, January 7–14). Self-supervised graph learning for long-tailed cognitive diagnosis. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, USA.
- Wu, R., Liu, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, E., Su, Y., Chen, Z., and Hu, G. (2015, January 25–31). Cognitive modelling for predicting examinee performance. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Douglas, 2004, Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis, Psychometrika, 69, 333, 10.1007/BF02295640 · DOI
- Tu, 2010, A polytomous cognitive diagnosis model: P-DINA model, Acta Psychol. Sin., 42, 1011, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.01011 · DOI
- Aryadoust, 2021, A cognitive diagnostic assessment study of the listening test of the Singapore–Cambridge general certificate of education O-level: Application of DINA, DINO, G-DINA, HO-DINA, and RRUM, Int. J. List., 35, 29, 10.1080/10904018.2018.1500915 · DOI
- Wang, 2018, The rapid calculation method of DINA model for large scale cognitive diagnosis, Acta Electonica Sin., 46, 1047
- Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann. · DOI
- Tang, 2023, COVID-19 medical waste transportation risk evaluation integrating type-2 fuzzy total interpretive structural modeling and Bayesian network, Expert Syst. Appl., 213, 118885, 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118885 · DOI
- Chan, L.S., Chu, A.M., and So, M.K. (2023). A moving-window bayesian network model for assessing systemic risk in financial markets. PLoS ONE, 18. · DOI
- Kamil, 2023, Textual data transformations using natural language processing for risk assessment, Risk Anal., 43, 2033, 10.1111/risa.14100 · DOI
- Yang, 2022, A novel quantitative relationship neural network for explainable cognitive diagnosis model, Knowl. Based Syst., 250, 109156, 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109156 · DOI
- VanLehn, 2005, The Andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 15, 147
- Käser, T., Klingler, S., Schwing, A.G., and Gross, M. (2014, January 5–9). Beyond knowledge tracing: Modeling skill topologies with bayesian networks. Proceedings of the Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 12th International Conference, ITS 2014, Honolulu, HI, USA. · DOI
- 2017, Bayesian knowledge tracing, logistic models, and beyond: An overview of learner modeling techniques, User Model. User Adapt. Interact., 27, 313, 10.1007/s11257-017-9193-2 · DOI
- Liu, S., Qu, H., Chen, Q., Jian, W., Liu, R., and You, L. (2022, January 15–18). AFMeta: Asynchronous Federated Meta-learning with Temporally Weighted Aggregation. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Smartworld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Digital Twin, Privacy Computing, Metaverse, Autonomous & Trusted Vehicles (SmartWorld/UIC/ScalCom/DigitalTwin/PriComp/Meta), Haikou, China. · DOI
- Liu, 2023, An effective learning evaluation method based on text data with real-time attribution-a case study for mathematical class with students of junior middle school in China, ACM Trans. Asian Low Resour. Lang. Inf. Process., 22, 1
- Liu, S., Yu, X., Ma, H., Wang, Z., Qin, C., and Zhang, X. (2023, January 21–25). Homogeneous Cohort-Aware Group Cognitive Diagnosis: A Multi-grained Modeling Perspective. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Birmingham, UK. · DOI
- Zhang, 2023, A generalized multi-skill aggregation method for cognitive diagnosis, World Wide Web, 26, 585, 10.1007/s11280-021-00990-4 · DOI
- Zhang, 2020, Bayesian estimation of the dina model with Pólya-gamma Gibbs sampling, Front. Psychol., 11, 384, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00384 · DOI
- Bi, H., Chen, E., He, W., Wu, H., Zhao, W., Wang, S., and Wu, J. (2023, January 7–14). BETA-CD: A Bayesian meta-learned cognitive diagnosis framework for personalized learning. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, USA. · DOI
- McLachlan, G. (September, January 28). On Aitken’s method and other approaches for accelerating convergence of the EM algorithm. Proceedings of the AC Aitken Centenary Conference, Dunedin, New Zealand.
- Dempster, 1977, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 39, 1, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · DOI · Paper page
- Geiger, 1990, Logical and algorithmic properties of independence and their application to Bayesian networks, Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 2, 165, 10.1007/BF01531004 · DOI
- Thiesson, 2001, Accelerating EM for large databases, Mach. Learn., 45, 279, 10.1023/A:1017986506241 · DOI
- Chang, H.S., Hsu, H.J., and Chen, K.T. (2015, January 26–29). Modeling Exercise Relationships in E-Learning: A Unified Approach. Proceedings of the EDM, Madrid, Spain.
- Hadi, 2023, Evaluating pre-trained models for user feedback analysis in software engineering: A study on classification of app-reviews, Empir. Softw. Eng., 28, 88, 10.1007/s10664-023-10314-x · DOI
- Koren, 2009, Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems, Computer, 42, 30, 10.1109/MC.2009.263 · DOI
- Wang, 2022, NeuralCD: A general framework for cognitive diagnosis, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 35, 8312, 10.1109/TKDE.2022.3201037 · DOI
- Li, J., Wang, F., Liu, Q., Zhu, M., Huang, W., Huang, Z., Chen, E., Su, Y., and Wang, S. (2022, January 14–18). HierCDF: A Bayesian Network-based Hierarchical Cognitive Diagnosis Framework. Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington, DC, USA. · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y., & Liang, S.
- Venue
- Big Data and Cognitive Computing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-12-29
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4
- ISSN
- 2504-2289
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.