Cited by 493Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline Learning and AnalyticsAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling

Conati, Cristina, Gertner, Abigail, VanLehn, Kurt·2002·User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021258506583

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conati, C., Gertner, A., & VanLehn, K.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Mitre (United States) (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
  • Conati, Cristina
  • Gertner, Abigail
  • VanLehn, Kurt
Venue
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Published
2002-11
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
371-417
ISSN
  • 0924-1868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1391
OpenAlex
W1529098247
Cited by
493
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 27
FWCI
18.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
Bayesian networks, student modeling, uncertainty management, adaptive tutoring systems, knowledge assessment, plan recognition, model scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review