Image Segmentation of the Ventricular Septum in Fetal Cardiac Ultrasound Videos Based on Deep Learning Using Time-Series Information
Open accessAbstract
Image segmentation is the pixel-by-pixel detection of objects, which is the most challenging but informative in the fundamental tasks of machine learning including image classification and object detection. Pixel-by-pixel segmentation is required to apply machine learning to support fetal cardiac ultrasound screening; we have to detect cardiac substructures precisely which are small and change shapes dynamically with fetal heartbeats, such as the ventricular septum. This task is difficult for general segmentation methods such as DeepLab v3+, and U-net. Hence, here we proposed a novel segmentation method named Cropping-Segmentation-Calibration (CSC) that is specific to the ventricular septum in ultrasound videos in this study. CSC employs the time-series information of videos and specific section information to calibrate the output of U-net. The actual sections of the ventricular septum were annotated in 615 frames from 421 normal fetal cardiac ultrasound videos of 211 pregnant women who were screened. The dataset was assigned a ratio of 2:1, which corresponded to a ratio of the training to test data, and three-fold cross-validation was conducted. The segmentation results of DeepLab v3+, U-net, and CSC were evaluated using the values of the mean intersection over union (mIoU), which were 0.0224, 0.1519, and 0.5543, respectively. The results reveal the superior performance of CSC.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Advantages of AI in fetal echocardiography include facilitation of standard view acquisition and CHD detection, and significant reduction in examination time.
“Advantages are the facilitation of standard view acquisition [58,60] and CHD detection [53,61,62], as well as a significant reduction in examination time [52,55].”
From Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2023) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation is attached to CHD detection, not to standard-view acquisition or examination time. The paper’s Limitations section states that the method was tested only on normal cases and is not for detecting abnormalities; its Conclusions describe automatic detection of septal abnormalities as a future goal. It demonstrates ventricular-septum segmentation, not facilitation of CHD detection. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRecognition of small CHD or small anatomical structures such as the trachea was limited in some models.
“Lastly, the recognition of small CHD or small anatomical structures such as the trachea was limited in some models [55,58].”
From Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2023) · cites this paper as [55]
The Introduction says the small, elongated ventricular septum is challenging to detect, and Discussion §4.1 explains that cropping a small target reduces the risk of detecting the wrong area. The paper does not study trachea recognition or test recognition of small CHD; §4.3 says its data contained no abnormalities and its method was not designed to detect them. No page numbers were provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDozen et al. reported a mean Intersection over Union of 0.5543 for image segmentation of ultrasound videos based on deep learning on the four-chamber view of the fetal heart.
“Dozen et al. developed a novel method for image segmentation of ultrasound videos based on deep learning on the four-chamber view of the fetal heart to accurately assess the ventricular septum and reported a mean Intersection over Union of 0.5543.79”
From Artificial intelligence in obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review. (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
Most fetal echocardiography studies only used 4CV images as the input for their algorithms.
“First, most of the studies only used 4CV images as the input for their algorithms [55,57,61,62,63,67,70]”
The detection rate of CHD could be increased by analyzing different standard views.
“although the detection rate of CHD could be increased by analyzing different standard views [55]”
From Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2023) · cites this paper as [55]
The Introduction says that observing the ventricular septum is important for CHD detection. The Limitations section names other cardiac views but says only that detecting the septum in those views would require more training data. Neither passage addresses whether analyzing different standard views increases the CHD detection rate; searches for that claim found no supporting passage. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 79
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [30]Hu Y.-T. Huang J.-B. Schwing A.G. MaskRNN: Instance Level Video Object Segmentation Proceedings of the Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Montreal, QC, Canada 3–8 December 2018 325 334
- Authors
- Dozen, A., Komatsu, M., Sakai, A., Komatsu, R., Shozu, K., Machino, H., Yasutomi, S., Arakaki, T., Asada, K., Kaneko, S., Matsuoka, R., Aoki, D., Sekizawa, A., & Hamamoto, R.
- Affiliations
- Keio University (JP)
- RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project (JP)
- Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
- SHOWA Medical University (JP)
- National Cancer Center Research Institute (JP)
- Fujitsu (Japan) (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Komatsu, Masaaki
- Hamamoto, Ryuji
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biomolecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-11-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1526
- ISSN
- 2218-273X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7695246
- OpenAlex
- W3104997875
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 4.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biomolecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KeiO Associated Repository of Academic Resources (Keio University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (the subsidy for Advanced Integrated Intelligence Platform)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- fetal echocardiography, U-Net, DeepLabV3+, fetal heartbeat
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Female, Fetal Heart, Fetus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, Time Factors, Ultrasonography, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Ventricular Septum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review