Cited by 119Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

Wearable Skin Sensors and Their Challenges: A Review of Transdermal, Optical, and Mechanical Sensors

Open access
Ahmad Tarar, Ammar, Mohammad, Umair, K. Srivastava, Soumya·2020·Biosensors

Abstract

Wearable technology and mobile healthcare systems are both increasingly popular solutions to traditional healthcare due to their ease of implementation and cost-effectiveness for remote health monitoring. Recent advances in research, especially the miniaturization of sensors, have significantly contributed to commercializing the wearable technology. Most of the traditional commercially available sensors are either mechanical or optical, but nowadays transdermal microneedles are also being used for micro-sensing such as continuous glucose monitoring. However, there remain certain challenges that need to be addressed before the possibility of large-scale deployment. The biggest challenge faced by all these wearable sensors is our skin, which has an inherent property to resist and protect the body from the outside world. On the other hand, biosensing is not possible without overcoming this resistance. Consequently, understanding the skin structure and its response to different types of sensing is necessary to remove the scientific barriers that are hindering our ability to design more efficient and robust skin sensors. In this article, we review research reports related to three different biosensing modalities that are commonly used along with the challenges faced in their implementation for detection. We believe this review will be of significant use to researchers looking to solve existing problems within the ongoing research in wearable sensors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/bios10060056

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Age, gender, and pathological conditions can cause various reflections, scattering, and light absorption.

    “Age, gender, and pathological conditions can cause various reflections, scattering, and light absorption [73].”

    From The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables (2022) · cites this paper as [73]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 180 · Cited by 119

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [27]Paul C. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology 9th ed. Christopher G. Jonathan B. Tanya B. Robert C. Daniel C. Wiley-Blackwell Hoboken, NJ, USA 2016 4696p 978-1118441190
  2. [53]Goldsmith L.A. Physiology, Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology of the Skin Goldsmith L.A. Oxford University Press New York, NY, USA 1991
  3. [54]Schaefer H. Schalla W. Zesch A. Stüttgen G. Skin Permeability Springer Berlin, Germany 1964

Authors
Ahmad Tarar, A., Mohammad, U., & K. Srivastava, S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biological Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • Department of Chemical & Materials Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
Venue
Biosensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-05-28
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
56
ISSN
2079-6374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3030403065
Cited by
119
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biosensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
wearable sensors, skin sensors, optical sensors, mechanical sensors, microneedles, continuous glucose monitoring, skin anatomy, remote patient monitoring, biosensing, sensor miniaturization
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Blood Glucose, Humans, Skin, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Biosensing Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review