Cited by 18Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Investigating the Effects of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation on EEG in Stroke Patients

Open access
Navid, Muhammad Samran, Niazi, Imran Khan, Lelic, Dina, Nedergaard, Rasmus Bach, Holt, Kelly, Amjad, Imran, Drewes, Asbjørn Mohr, Haavik, Heidi·2020·Brain Sciences

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of chiropractic spinal manipulation on the early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) recorded from chronic stroke patients. Methods: Seventeen male patients (53 ± 12 years old) participated in this randomized cross-over study. The patients received chiropractic spinal manipulation and control intervention, in random order, separated by at least 24 hours. EEG was recorded before and after each intervention during rest and stimulation of the non-paretic median nerve. For resting-state EEG, the delta-alpha ratio, brain-symmetry index, and power-spectra were calculated. For SEPs, the amplitudes and latencies of N20 and N30 peaks were assessed. Source localization was performed on the power-spectra of resting-state EEG and the N30 SEP peak. Results: Following spinal manipulation, the N30 amplitude increased by 39%, which was a significant increase compared to the control intervention (p < 0.01). The latency and changes to the strength of the cortical sources underlying the N30 peak were not significant. The N20 peak, the resting-state power-spectra, delta-alpha ratio, brain-symmetry index, and resting-state source localization showed no significant changes after either intervention. Conclusion: A single session of chiropractic spinal manipulation increased the amplitude of the N30 SEP peak in a group of chronic stroke patients, which may reflect changes to early sensorimotor function. More research is required to investigate the long-term effects of chiropractic spinal manipulation, to better understand what impact it may have on the neurological function of stroke survivors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/brainsci10050253

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Britton J.W. Frey L.C. Hopp J.L. Korb P. Koubeissi M.Z. Lievens W.E. Pestana-Knight E.M. Louis E.K.S. Electroencephalography (EEG): An Introductory Text and Atlas of Normal and Abnormal Findings in Adults, Children, and Infants Allen Press, Inc. Lawrence, KS, USA 2016 27748095

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Navid, M. S., Niazi, I. K., Lelic, D., Nedergaard, R. B., Holt, K., Amjad, I., Drewes, A. M., & Haavik, H.
Affiliations
  • New Zealand College of Chiropractic (NZ)
  • Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Niazi, Imran Khan
Venue
Brain Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-04-27
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
253
ISSN
2076-3425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3019529435
Cited by
18
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Australian Spinal Research Foundation (Not Applicable)
  • United Chiropractic Association (Not Applicable)
  • Hamblin Chiropractic Research Fund Trust (Not Applicable)
  • The Rubicon Group (Not Applicable)
  • Scottish Chiropractic Association (Not Applicable)
  • Halsa Chiropractic, and Physiotherapy (Not Applicable)
  • Centre for Chiropractic Research Supporters Program (Not Applicable)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
chiropractic spinal manipulation, chronic stroke, somatosensory evoked potentials, resting-state EEG, median nerve stimulation, delta/alpha ratio, brain asymmetry, sensorimotor function, source localization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review