The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic Interaction between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors
Open accessAbstract
Student engagement plays a significant role in promoting student learning outcomes in the higher education context. The goal of this meta-analysis was to investigate factors influencing student engagement in higher education institutions in different contexts. The meta-analysis integrated data from 93,188 participants and 148 effects across studies to address this issue. The meta-analysis revealed 14 factors affecting students’ learning participation. The classification was based on internal and external factors, aiming to explore the main factors influencing students’ intention, behavior, and process of learning participation. The external influencing factors with moderate correlations were the teacher-student relationship (R = 0.456, p < 0.001) and positive teacher behavior (R = 0.419, p < 0.001). Additionally, the main external influencing factors were partnership (R = 0.174, p < 0.001), environmental support (R = −0.028), negative teacher behavior (R = −0.064), and negative learning behavior (R = −0145), which were all negatively correlated with learning participation. The results also indicated that factors influencing student engagement can be divided into two categories: promoting factors and hindering factors. The promoting factors include students’ positive emotion, positive learning behavior, positive teacher behavior, the teacher-student relationship and partnership, students’ learning and thinking ability, the support of learning resources, students’ individual and personality characteristics, and teaching factors. The hindering factors include lack of environmental support, negative student behavior, and negative teacher behavior. Further, conceptual and practical implications are discussed in relation to these findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education
Astin, A. W. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315051888-15 · Cited by 5,265
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571 · Cited by 3,428 · cited 1×
“The emotional factors involve students’ affective communication and practices on campus [16].”
BackgroundFraming student engagement in higher education
Kahu, E. R. (2013) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505 · Cited by 2,103
Relationships matter: linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement.
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x · Cited by 2,082 · cited 1×
“Several studies have been conducted to determine factors influencing student engagement, and student engagement has been well-studied in a range of contexts, focusing on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral integration of students’ learning performance [8,9].”
BackgroundStudent engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20303 · Cited by 1,956 · cited 1×
“The critique, learning agency/democracy, purposes of learning, knowledge, and values should be considered to fully understand the complexity of student engagement [2].”
BackgroundUnmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence
Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116 · Cited by 1,840
The teacher-child relationship and children's early school adjustment
Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1997) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-4405(96)00029-5 · Cited by 1,814
Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages*
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9 · Cited by 1,782
Kuh, G. D. (2003) · Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.1080/00091380309604090 · Cited by 1,248
Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement
Zhao, C.-M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1023/b:rihe.0000015692.88534.de · Cited by 1,198
Cited by
Xu, A., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2025.2505665 · Cited by 2
El-Awaisi, A., Abdelkader, N. N., O’Hara, L., Jaam, M., Thistlethwaite, J., El Hajj, M. S., & Stewart, D. (2026) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2026.2666149
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., & Xue, E.
- Venue
- Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-01-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59
- ISSN
- 2076-328X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4317243056
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 19.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Interaction between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/bs13010059
- The paper
- Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic Interaction between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors. Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.