Cited by 13Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research

Measurable Residual Disease in High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Open access
Cluzeau, Thomas, Lemoli, Roberto M., McCloskey, James, Cooper, Todd·2022·Cancers

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests measurable residual disease (MRD) assessments are prognostic in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). High-risk AML encompasses a subset of AML with poor response to therapy and prognosis, with features such as therapy-related AML, an antecedent hematologic disorder, extramedullary disease (in adults), and selected mutations and cytogenetic abnormalities. Historically, few patients with high-risk AML achieved deep and durable remission with conventional chemotherapy; however, newer agents might be more effective in achieving MRD-negative remission. CPX-351 (dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin/cytarabine at a synergistic ratio) demonstrated MRD-negativity rates of 36–64% across retrospective studies in adults with newly diagnosed high-risk AML and 84% in pediatric patients with first-relapse AML. Venetoclax (BCL2 inhibitor) demonstrated MRD-negativity rates of 33–53% in combination with hypomethylating agents for high-risk subgroups in studies of older adults with newly diagnosed AML who were ineligible for intensive therapy and 65% in combination with chemotherapy in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory AML. However, there is no consensus on optimal MRD methodology in AML, and the use of different techniques, sample sources, sensitivity thresholds, and the timing of assessments limit comparisons across studies. Robust MRD analyses are needed in future clinical studies, and MRD monitoring should become a routine aspect of AML management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cancers14051278

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MRD is a good surrogate marker for OS in a prospective frontline HR-MDS study.

    “MRD is a good surrogate marker for OS as recently shown in a prospective frontline HR‐MDS study.”

    From Long‐term follow‐up and combined Phase 2 results of eprenetapopt and azacitidine in patients with <i>TP53</i> mutant MDS/AML (2025) · cites this paper as [46]

    Section 3, “Prognostic Value of MRD in AML” (page unavailable), reports an association between MRD negativity and better overall survival in AML. It does not describe a prospective frontline high-risk MDS study or establish MRD as a surrogate marker for overall survival in that setting. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cluzeau, T., Lemoli, R. M., McCloskey, J., & Cooper, T.
Affiliations
  • Université Côte d'Azur (FR)
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
  • Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
  • Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Cluzeau, Thomas
Venue
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
1278
ISSN
2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214924516
Cited by
13
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Keywords
minimal residual disease, high-risk acute myeloid leukemia, MRD negativity, CPX-351, daunorubicin, cytarabine, liposomal chemotherapy, venetoclax, BCL-2 inhibitor, hypomethylating agents, relapsed/refractory AML, therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, prognostic factors, MRD monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review