The DOI matches its Crossref record; 371 of the 371 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Experiencing pain and insufficient relief can be devastating and negatively affect a patient’s quality of life. Developments in oncology such as new treatments and adjusted pain management guidelines may have influenced the prevalence of cancer pain and severity in patients. This review aims to provide an overview of the prevalence and severity of pain in cancer patients in the 2014–2021 literature period. A systematic literature search was performed using the databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Titles and abstracts were screened, and full texts were evaluated and assessed on methodological quality. A meta-analysis was performed on the pooled prevalence and severity rates. A meta-regression analysis was used to explore differences between treatment groups. We identified 10,637 studies, of which 444 studies were included. The overall prevalence of pain was 44.5%. Moderate to severe pain was experienced by 30.6% of the patients, a lower proportion compared to previous research. Pain experienced by cancer survivors was significantly lower compared to most treatment groups. Our results imply that both the prevalence of pain and pain severity declined in the past decade. Increased attention to the assessment and management of pain might have fostered the decline in the prevalence and severity of pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years
van den Beuken-van Everdingen, M. H. J., de Rijke, J. M., Kessels, A. G., Schouten, H. C., van Kleef, M., & Patijn, J. (2007) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm056 · Cited by 1,923
Self-citationUpdate on Prevalence of Pain in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
van den Beuken-van Everdingen, M. H. J., Hochstenbach, L. M. J., Joosten, E. A. J., Tjan-Heijnen, V. C. G., & Janssen, D. J. A. (2016) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.340 · Cited by 1,663
Self-citationSerlin, R. C., Mendoza, T. R., Nakamura, Y., Edwards, K. R., & Cleeland, C. S. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-h · Cited by 1,494
Management of cancer pain in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines
Fallon, M., Giusti, R., Aielli, F., Hoskin, P., Rolke, R., Sharma, M., & Ripamonti, C. I. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy152 · Cited by 954
Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain. A review of published literature
Deandrea, S., Montanari, M., Moja, L., & Apolone, G. (2008) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn419 · Cited by 870
Ageing and the epidemiology of multimorbidity
Divo, M. J., Martinez, C. H., & Mannino, D. M. (2014) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00059814 · Cited by 701
Adult Cancer Pain, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Swarm, R. A., Paice, J. A., Anghelescu, D. L., Are, M., Bruce, J. Y., Buga, S., Chwistek, M., Cleeland, C., Craig, D., Gafford, E., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0038 · Cited by 621
Pearce, A., Haas, M., Viney, R., Pearson, S.-A., Haywood, P., Brown, C., & Ward, R. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184360 · Cited by 534
Metadata
- Authors
- Snijders, R., Brom, L., Theunissen, M., & van den Beuken-van Everdingen, M.
- Venue
- Cancers
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-01-18
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 591
- ISSN
- 2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4317436309
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 371
- FWCI
- 38.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/cancers15030591
- The paper
- Snijders, R., Brom, L., Theunissen, M., & van den Beuken-van Everdingen, M. (2023). Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030591
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.