The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AI-Powered Diagnosis of Skin Cancer: A Contemporary Review, Open Challenges and Future Research Directions
Open accessAbstract
Skin cancer continues to remain one of the major healthcare issues across the globe. If diagnosed early, skin cancer can be treated successfully. While early diagnosis is paramount for an effective cure for cancer, the current process requires the involvement of skin cancer specialists, which makes it an expensive procedure and not easily available and affordable in developing countries. This dearth of skin cancer specialists has given rise to the need to develop automated diagnosis systems. In this context, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based methods have been proposed. These systems can assist in the early detection of skin cancer and can consequently lower its morbidity, and, in turn, alleviate the mortality rate associated with it. Machine learning and deep learning are branches of AI that deal with statistical modeling and inference, which progressively learn from data fed into them to predict desired objectives and characteristics. This survey focuses on Machine Learning and Deep Learning techniques deployed in the field of skin cancer diagnosis, while maintaining a balance between both techniques. A comparison is made to widely used datasets and prevalent review papers, discussing automated skin cancer diagnosis. The study also discusses the insights and lessons yielded by the prior works. The survey culminates with future direction and scope, which will subsequently help in addressing the challenges faced within automated skin cancer diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures










Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Artificial intelligence (AI) for medical diagnosis holds potential, demonstrating high performance in detecting various diseases.57”
From Using artificial intelligence to improve human performance: efficient retinal disease detection training with synthetic images (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Skin lesion classification using decision trees and random forest algorithms
Dhivyaa, C. R., Sangeetha, K., -, M. B., Amaran, S., Vetriselvi, T., & Johnpaul, P. (2020) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02675-8 · Cited by 90
RetractedRETRACTED: Computer aided intelligent medical system and nursing of breast surgery infection
Sun, J., & Huang, Y. R. (2020) · Microprocessors and Microsystems · doi:10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103769 · Cited by 3
RetractedDermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
Overview of Next‐Generation Sequencing Technologies
Slatko, B. E., Gardner, A. F., & Ausubel, F. M. (2018) · Current Protocols in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1002/cpmb.59 · Cited by 968
Next-generation sequencing technologies: An overview
Hu, T., Chitnis, N., Monos, D., & Dinh, A. (2021) · Human Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.humimm.2021.02.012 · Cited by 949
Classification of Skin Disease Using Deep Learning Neural Networks with MobileNet V2 and LSTM
Srinivasu, P. N., SivaSai, J. G., Ijaz, M. F., Bhoi, A. K., Kim, W., & Kang, J. J. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21082852 · Cited by 763
Han, S. S., Kim, M. S., Lim, W., Park, G., Park, I., & Chang, S. E. (2018) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2018.01.028 · Cited by 740
Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review
Brinker, T. J., Hekler, A., Utikal, J. S., Grabe, N., Schadendorf, D., Klode, J., Berking, C., Steeb, T., Enk, A. H., & Kalle, C. V. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/11936 · Cited by 528
Goyal, M., Knackstedt, T., Yan, S., & Hassanpour, S. (2020) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104065 · Cited by 476
Cancer Diagnosis Using Deep Learning: A Bibliographic Review
Munir, K., Elahi, H., Ayub, A., Frezza, F., & Rizzi, A. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11091235 · Cited by 437
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Nahata, H., and Singh, S.P. (2020). Machine Learning with Health Care Perspective, Springer.
- Alwan, 2022, Skin cancer images classification using naïve bayes, Emergent J. Educ. Discov. Lifelong Learn., 3, 19
- Anas, 2017, Skin cancer classification using K-means clustering, Int. J. Tech. Res. Appl., 5, 62
- Peter Soosai Anandaraj, A., Gomathy, V., Amali Angel Punitha, A., Abitha Kumari, D., Sheeba Rani, S., and Sureshkumar, S. (2021). Cognitive Internet of Medical Things for Smart Healthcare, Springer.
- Gerke, S., Minssen, T., and Cohen, G. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Academic Press.
- Barata, C., Marques, J.S., and Celebi, M.E. (2014). 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), IEEE.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A robust deep learning framework for multiclass skin cancer classification
Özdemir, B., & Paçal, İ. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-89230-7 · Cited by 153
Artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and therapy: Current status and future perspective
Sufyan, M., Shokat, Z., & Ashfaq, U. A. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107356 · Cited by 170
A novel CNN-ViT-based deep learning model for early skin cancer diagnosis
Paçal, İ., Ozdemir, B., Zeynalov, J., Gasimov, H., & Pacal, N. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107627 · Cited by 160
AI in Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis: Techniques, Trends, and Future Directions
Habchi, Y., Himeur, Y., Kheddar, H., Boukabou, A., Atalla, S., Chouchane, A., Ouamane, A., & Mansoor, W. (2023) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems11100519 · Cited by 125
AI'S IMPACT ON PERSONALIZED MEDICINE: TAILORING TREATMENTS FOR IMPROVED HEALTH OUTCOMES
Udegbe, F. C., Ebulue, O. R., Ebulue, C. C., & Ekesiobi, C. S. (2024) · Engineering Science & Technology Journal · doi:10.51594/estj.v5i4.1040 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Melarkode, N., Srinivasan, K., Qaisar, S. M., & Plawiak, P.
- Affiliations
- Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
- Effat University (SA)
- Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Telecommunications, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Krakow, Poland
- Corresponding author
- Srinivasan, Kathiravan
- Venue
- Cancers
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-02-13
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1183
- ISSN
- 2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9953963
- OpenAlex
- W4320492826
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 10
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- VIT University
- Politechnika Krakowska
- Effat University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- skin cancer, automated diagnosis, early detection, machine learning, deep learning, dermatological image analysis, skin lesion classification, medical image dataset, access to specialist care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review