Cited by 19Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Elucidating Synergistic Effects of Different Metal Ratios in Bimetallic Fe/Co-N-C Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction

Open access
Gollasch, Marius, Müller-Hülstede, Julia, Schmies, Henrike, Schonvogel, Dana, Wagner, Peter, Dyck, Alexander, Wark, Michael·2021·Catalysts

Abstract

Lowering or eliminating the noble-metal content in oxygen reduction fuel cell catalysts could propel the large-scale introduction of commercial fuel cell systems. Several noble-metal free catalysts are already under investigation with the metal-nitrogen-carbon (Me-N-C) system being one of the most promising. In this study, a systematic approach to investigate the influence of metal ratios in bimetallic Me-N-C fuel cells oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts has been taken. Different catalysts with varying ratios of Fe and Co have been synthesized and characterized both physically and electrochemically in terms of activity, selectivity and stability with the addition of an accelerated stress test (AST). The catalysts show different electrochemical properties depending on the metal ratio such as a high electrochemical mass activity with increasing Fe ratio. Properties do not change linearly with the metal ratio, with a Fe/Co ratio of 5:3 showing a higher mass activity with simultaneous higher stability. Selectivity indicators plateau for catalysts with a Co content of 50% metal ratio and less, showing the same values as a monometallic Co catalyst. These findings indicate a deeper relationship between the ratio of different metals and physical and electrochemical properties in bimetallic Me-N-C catalysts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/catal11070841

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gollasch, M., Müller-Hülstede, J., Schmies, H., Schonvogel, D., Wagner, P., Dyck, A., & Wark, M.
Affiliations
  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
  • German Aerospace Center, Institute for Engineering Thermodynamics, Carl-von-Ossietzky Straße 15, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Corresponding author
Wagner, Peter
Venue
Catalysts
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-07-13
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
841
ISSN
2073-4344 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3179752935
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Catalysts (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (INST 184/144-1 FUGG, INST 184/154-1 FUGG)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
oxygen reduction reaction, metal-nitrogen-carbon catalysts, metal ratios, noble metal-free catalysts, fuel cell catalysts, catalyst selectivity, catalyst stability, accelerated stress testing, synergistic effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review