Cited by 14Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringNon-Destructive Testing Techniques

A Semi-Supervised Inspection Approach of Textured Surface Defects under Limited Labeled Samples

Open access
He, Yu, Wen, Xin, Xu, Jing·2022·Coatings

Abstract

Defect inspection is a key step in guaranteeing the surface quality of industrial products. Based on deep learning (DL) techniques, related methods are highly effective in defect classification tasks via a supervision process. However, collecting and labeling many defect samples are usually harsh and time-consuming processes, limiting the application of these supervised classifiers on various textured surfaces. This study proposes a semi-supervised framework, based on a generative adversarial network (GAN) and a convolutional neural network (CNN), to classify defects of a textured surface, while a novel label assignment scheme is proposed to integrate unlabeled samples into semi-supervised learning to enhance the overall performance of the system. In this framework, a customized GAN uses limited labeled samples to generate unlabeled ones, while the proposed label assignment scheme makes the generated data follow different label distributions in such a way that they can participate in training with labeled data. Finally, a CNN is proposed for semi-supervised training and the category identification of each defect sample. Experimental results show the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed framework even if original samples are limited. We verify our approach on four different surface defect datasets, achieving consistently competitive performances.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/coatings12111707

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In actual steel production, high-quality datasets for training machine learning algorithms are very difficult to obtain because defects are small probability events and obtaining many samples with various defect types is difficult.

    “In the actual production environment, it is very difficult to obtain high quality datasets for training machine learning related algorithms because defects in steel production are originally small probability events, and it is very difficult to obtain many samples with various types of defects”

    From Steel Surface Defect Recognition: A Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Introduction says defect samples are hard to collect in large numbers and attributes the difficulty of collecting defect data to the rare occurrence of defects. It discusses industrial textured surfaces, including metal, but does not specifically establish this for steel production or say that obtaining samples across various defect types is difficult. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Labeling steel surface defect data is costly and labor intensive.

    “the labeling of the data is also costly and labor intensive [4][5][6][7].”

    From Steel Surface Defect Recognition: A Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Huang, Y.; Qiu, C.; Guo, Y. Saliency of magnetic tile surface defects. In Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Auto-Mation and Engineering, Munich, Germany, 18-22 June 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, Y., Wen, X., & Xu, J.
Affiliations
Shenyang University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Yu
Venue
Coatings
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-11-09
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
1707
ISSN
2079-6412 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308866885
Cited by
14
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Coatings (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
SUT Youth Scientific Research Ability Cultivation Project (200005796)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Keywords
surface defect detection, textured surfaces, semi-supervised learning, generative adversarial networks, limited labeled data, synthetic data generation, convolutional neural networks, defect classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review