Cited by 58Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

SkinNet-INIO: Multiclass Skin Lesion Localization and Classification Using Fusion-Assisted Deep Neural Networks and Improved Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithm

Open access
Hussain, Muneezah, Khan, Muhammad Attique, Damaševičius, Robertas, Alasiry, Areej, Marzougui, Mehrez, Alhaisoni, Majed, Masood, Anum·2023·Diagnostics

Abstract

Background: Using artificial intelligence (AI) with the concept of a deep learning-based automated computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system has shown improved performance for skin lesion classification. Although deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) have significantly improved many image classification tasks, it is still difficult to accurately classify skin lesions because of a lack of training data, inter-class similarity, intra-class variation, and the inability to concentrate on semantically significant lesion parts. Innovations: To address these issues, we proposed an automated deep learning and best feature selection framework for multiclass skin lesion classification in dermoscopy images. The proposed framework performs a preprocessing step at the initial step for contrast enhancement using a new technique that is based on dark channel haze and top–bottom filtering. Three pre-trained deep learning models are fine-tuned in the next step and trained using the transfer learning concept. In the fine-tuning process, we added and removed a few additional layers to lessen the parameters and later selected the hyperparameters using a genetic algorithm (GA) instead of manual assignment. The purpose of hyperparameter selection using GA is to improve the learning performance. After that, the deeper layer is selected for each network and deep features are extracted. The extracted deep features are fused using a novel serial correlation-based approach. This technique reduces the feature vector length to the serial-based approach, but there is little redundant information. We proposed an improved anti-Lion optimization algorithm for the best feature selection to address this issue. The selected features are finally classified using machine learning algorithms. Main Results: The experimental process was conducted using two publicly available datasets, ISIC2018 and ISIC2019. Employing these datasets, we obtained an accuracy of 96.1 and 99.9%, respectively. Comparison was also conducted with state-of-the-art techniques and shows the proposed framework improved accuracy. Conclusions: The proposed framework successfully enhances the contrast of the cancer region. Moreover, the selection of hyperparameters using the automated techniques improved the learning process of the proposed framework. The proposed fusion and improved version of the selection process maintains the best accuracy and shorten the computational time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/diagnostics13182869

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fusion image processing techniques can improve the localization and classification of skin lesions by analyzing macro-scale images.

    “Fusion image processing techniques can improve the localization and classification of skin lesions by analyzing macro-scale images [42,43]”

    From Artificial Intelligence in the Histopathological Assessment of Non-Neoplastic Skin Disorders: A Narrative Review with Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Results and Discussion (§4.2) report that feature fusion improved skin-lesion classification accuracy. The Introduction (§1) identifies localization as a challenge the method aims to address, but the cited results do not establish a localization improvement. The Datasets Description (§3.1) says the images were captured by dermoscopy or dermatoscopy, not described as macro-scale images. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [36]Pacheco A.G. Ali A.R. Trappenberg T. Skin cancer detection based on deep learning and entropy to detect outlier samples arXiv 2019 1909.04525
  2. [49]He K. Zhang X. Ren S. Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Las Vegas, NV, USA 27 June–1 July 2016 770 778

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hussain, M., Khan, M. A., Damaševičius, R., Alasiry, A., Marzougui, M., Alhaisoni, M., & Masood, A.
Affiliations
  • HITEC University (PK)
  • Kaunas University of Technology (LT)
  • King Khalid University (SA)
  • Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
  • Khan, Muhammad Attique
  • Masood, Anum
Venue
Diagnostics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-09-06
Volume
13
Issue
18
Pages
2869
ISSN
2075-4418 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386476087
Cited by
58
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 1
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diagnostics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTUePubl (Repository of Kaunas University of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University (RGP2/249/44)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
skin lesion classification, dermoscopic images, computer-aided diagnosis, feature fusion, feature selection, genetic algorithm hyperparameter tuning, transfer learning, contrast enhancement, deep feature extraction, ISIC 2018, ISIC 2019

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review