CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 110Digital Economy and TransformationICT Impact and PoliciesGlobal Trade and Competitiveness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital Competitiveness in the European Union Era: The Greek Case

Open access
Laitsou, Eleni, Kargas, Antonios, Varoutas, Dimitris·2020·Economies
DOI 10.3390/economies8040085
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Digital competitiveness is gaining more and more attention as a source of competitive advantage at the business and national economies levels. Digital economy performance is a matter of national strategies for achieving economic growth and socioeconomic development. Widely accepted instruments for reporting progress in these areas have been recently developed, including the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI index). The current study aims to use the DESI index and its five dimensions (namely Connectivity, Human Capital, Use of Internet Services, Integration of Digital Technology and Digital Public Services) not only as a tool for recognizing the current state, but also to forecast progress under the Greek economic environment. The Gompertz model was used as a methodological tool and it is valuable that a diffusion model has been implemented on a composite index related to countries’ digital competitiveness. Moreover, the results reveal the areas where convergencies and divergencies exist between Greece and the rest of the EU-28 member states, while forecast permits one to evaluate how current policies have a significant impact on digital competitiveness. Results indicate that Greece is facing significant challenges as a result of the low state of digitization, coming from both the demand side (businesses that consume internet services) and the offer side (institutional and governmental constraints). The proposed results could be used in order to readjust existing policies and to spot aspects where further improvement is needed to achieve high standards of digital competitiveness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/economies8040085

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Burlacioiu, Cristina, Moise, Irina, Boboc, Cristina, and Croitoru, Elena Oana (, January November). Digital Technology Trend in Romania and its Impact on the Young Segment. Paper presented at 12th International Management Conference “Management Perspectives in the Digital Era”, Bucharest, Romania.
  2. Kwilinski, 2020, Formation of Global Competitive Enterprise Environment Based on Industry 4.0 Concept | Abstract, International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 24, 1
  3. Gompertz, Benjamin (1825). On the Nature of the Function Expressive of the Law of Human Mortality, and on a New Mode of Determining the Value of Life Contingencies, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Available online: https://www.medicine.mcgill.ca/epidemiology/hanley/c609/material/Gompertz-1825.pdf.
  4. Mostarac, 2020, The Digital Transformation of Croatian Economy Compared With EU Member CountriesIES, Ekonomski Vjesnik/Econviews, 33, 151
  5. 2019, Organizational Learning in Industry 4.0, Problemy Zarzadzania, 82, 96
  6. Sudtasan, Tatcha, and Mitomo, Hitoshi (2017). Comparison of Diffusion Models for Forecasting the Growth of Broadband Markets in Thailand. 14th Asia-Pacific Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): “Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society”, International Telecommunications Society (ITS). Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/168541www.econstor.eu.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Laitsou, E., Kargas, A., & Varoutas, D.
Affiliations
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Varoutas, Dimitris
ORCID
Venue
Economies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-10-15
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
85
ISSN
2227-7099 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/economies8040085
OpenAlex
W3093345774
Cited by
92
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13
FWCI
13.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Economies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Economy and Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › ICT Impact and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
Keywords
digital competitiveness, Digital Economy and Society Index, Greece, Gompertz model, digital economy, digital public services, digital human capital, digital connectivity, digital integration, digital policy, EU-28 comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review