The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gamification in Science Education. A Systematic Review of the Literature
Open accessAbstract
The implementation of gamification in education has attracted many researchers to increase engagement and achieve learning more effectively. Implementing technology in science curricula has seen a massive influx over the past years to stop the decline in students’ motivation towards science learning and promote scientific thinking. This study’s objective is to present the empirical findings of the state-of-the-art literature on the use of gamification in science education. Therefore, we performed a systematic literature review of 24 empirical research papers published in various electronic databases and the web search engine for scholarly literature and academic resources, Google Scholar, between 2012 and 2020. This review reveals the latest emerging trends of gamification in science education while revealing the literature gap, challenges, impediments, and extending the possibilities for future research directions. It examines the conflicting findings of other studies and provides a framework and insight for future researchers regarding content areas, educational levels, theoretical models, outcomes, methodologies, game elements, and assessment tools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666 · cited 3×
“, extrinsic motivation, self-determination theory (SDT) encompasses, to some extent, a more holistic and comprehensive approach, including both intrinsic and extrinsic motivations and the connections between them [35].”
BackgroundInfluentialBuilding a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766 · cited 4×
“jectives that students consciously strive to attain [45] while using game elements to direct”
BackgroundInfluentialDeci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 · Cited by 7,176 · cited 1×
“The degree of internalization depends on the person’s perception of the events as supporting and informational that aids them to achieve their psychological needs [39,40].”
BackgroundDoes Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014) · 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.377 · Cited by 5,201
Gamification in theory and action: a survey
Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006 · Cited by 2,515 · cited 1×
“SDT has been extensively applied to the context of video games [42,43] and has been one of the primary target theories for gamification as well [26,34,44].”
BackgroundThe role of google scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138237 · Cited by 2,387
Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033 · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
Yang, Q.-F., Lian, L.-W., & Zhao, J.-H. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00391-9 · Cited by 152
Lim, T. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13116436 · Cited by 117
Alhalafawy, W. S., & Tawfiq Zaki, M. Z. (2022) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v17i06.28885 · Cited by 69
Chen, M.-F., Chen, Y.-C., Zuo, P.-Y., & Hou, H.-T. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11708-6 · Cited by 65
A Review of Gamification Impact on Student Behavioural and Learning Outcomes
Nurtanto, M., Kholifah, N., Ahdhianto, E., Samsudin, A., & Isnantyo, F. D. (2021) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v15i21.24381 · Cited by 59
Models of Instructional Design in Gamification: A Systematic Review of the Literature
González-Fernández, A., Revuelta-Domínguez, F.-I., & Fernández-Sánchez, M. R. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12010044 · Cited by 37
Digitalization of the educational process for the training of the pre-service teachers
Strutynska, O. V., Torbin, G. M., Umryk, M. A., & Vernydub, R. M. (2021) · CTE Workshop Proceedings · doi:10.55056/cte.231 · Cited by 27
Cross-Cultural Gamification: Understanding Design and User Experience in Different Cultural Contexts
Asrifan, A., Kaddas, B., Mulyadi, M., Pratiwi, W. R., Supriadi, S., & Jabu, B. (2024) · Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8322-3.ch001 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A.-I.
- Venue
- Education Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-01-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22
- ISSN
- 2227-7102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3119317690
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 23.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
