Cited by 8Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentScience Education and PedagogySTEM Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scientific Thinking Promotes the Development of Critical Thinking in Primary Education

Open access
de los Santos, Olivia, Hernández-Padilla, Eduardo, Vázquez-Alonso, Ángel, López-Aymes, Gabriela, Aguilar-Tamayo, Manuel Francisco, Arce, Elsah·2025·Education Sciences

Abstract

Incorporating scientific and critical thinking in early childhood education is essential for developing individuals with strong thinking skills. This study assesses the impact of promoting scientific thinking on the development of critical thinking among fifth-graders in central Mexico. We hypothesize that involving students in scientific thinking tasks would further enhance essential thinking skills. The methodology involved longitudinal quasi-experimental design that included a pre-test and post-test, along with a comparison (control) group. Critical thinking was measured using a test that was applied at the start and end of our study to assess four thinking skills: classification, problem-solving, decision-making and logical reasoning. The control group was taught using a standardized methodology, while the experimental group was taught about the structure of the scientific method using a template with characters that guided each step: observation, question, hypothesis, experimentation and conclusions. Students from the critical and scientific thinking experimental group had higher scores on the post-assessment than those of the control group, suggesting that learning through scientific thinking tasks improved their critical thinking skills. Boys’ critical thinking scores were higher than girls’ in both groups, while scientific thinking scores were not associated with gender. We demonstrated that critical thinking improves when children incorporate scientific thinking into their learning abilities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/educsci15091174

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Albarracín-Vivo, D., Encabo-Fernández, E., Jerez-Martínez, I., and Hernández-Delgado, L. (2024). Gender differences and critical thinking: A study on the written compositions of primary education students. Societies, 14. · DOI
  2. Anastasiou, 2015, The construction of scientific knowledge at an early age: Two crucial factors, Creative Education, 6, 262, 10.4236/ce.2015.62025 · DOI
  3. Bailin, 1999, Conceptualizing critical thinking, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 285, 10.1080/002202799183133 · DOI
  4. Banaji, 1996, Automatic stereotyping, Psychological Science, 7, 136, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00346.x · DOI
  5. Bhanot, 2009, The links between parent behaviors and boys’ and girls’ science achievement beliefs, Applied Developmental Science, 13, 42, 10.1080/10888690802606784 · DOI
  6. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., and Salas, E. (1998). Critical thinking skills in tactical decision making: A model and a training strategy. Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training, American Psychological Association. · DOI
  7. Crowley, 2001, Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking, Psychological Science, 12, 258, 10.1111/1467-9280.00347 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dalecki, 1991, Examining change using regression analysis: Three approaches compared, Sociological Spectrum, 11, 127, 10.1080/02732173.1991.9981960 · DOI
  9. Yuzawa, 2001, The effects of social cues on confidence judgments mediated by knowledge and regulation of cognition, Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 325, 10.1080/00220970109599491 · DOI
  10. Ennis, 1985, A logical basis for measuring ct skills, Educational Leadership, 43, 44
  11. Facione, 2000, The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill, Informal Logic, 20, 61, 10.22329/il.v20i1.2254 · DOI
  12. Fang, 1999, Emergent metacognition: A study of preschoolers’ literate behavior, Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13, 175, 10.1080/02568549909594738 · DOI
  13. Fisher, A. (2009). Critical thinking: An introduction, Cambridge University Press.
  14. Guarrella, 2022, Toward assessment for playful learning in early childhood: Influences on teachers’ science assessment practices, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60, 608, 10.1002/tea.21811 · DOI
  15. Howe, 1996, Development of science concepts within a Vygotskian framework, Science Education, 80, 35, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199601)80:1<35::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  16. Jaimes, 2014, Los niños y las niñas un grupo vulnerable en México, Revista Internacional de Administración y Finanzas, 6, 1
  17. Jones, 1990, Gender differences in teacher-student interactions in science classrooms, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 861, 10.1002/tea.3660270906 · DOI
  18. Kind, 2013, Establishing assessment scales using a novel disciplinary rationale for scientific reasoning, Journal of Research in Science, 50, 530
  19. Klahr, 2005, Early science instruction: Addressing fundamental issues, Psychological Science, 16, 871, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01629.x · DOI
  20. Klahr, 2005, Cognitive research and elementary science instruction: From the laboratory, to the classroom, and back, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 217, 10.1007/s10956-005-4423-5 · DOI
  21. Şen, H. H., and Selin, H. (2022). Scientific thinking in young children: Development, culture, and education. Childhood in Turkey: Educational, sociological, and psychological perspectives, Springer.
  22. Kuhn, 2005, Is developing scientific thinking all about learning to control variables?, Psychological Science, 16, 866, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01628.x · DOI
  23. 2024, Comparison of complex thinking skills between students from public and private institutions in Mexico, International Journal of Instruction, 17, 43, 10.29333/iji.2024.1713a · DOI
  24. Magno, 2010, The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking, Metacognition and Learning, 5, 137, 10.1007/s11409-010-9054-4 · DOI
  25. 2019, Conceptualización y taxonomía para estructurar los conocimientos acerca de la ciencia, Revista Electrónica de Educación a Distancia, 16, 3104
  26. 2023, Assessing critical thinking skills: A diagnosis of elementary students (CT), Revista Evaluar, 23, 40
  27. Mattes, A., and Roheger, M. (2020). Nothing wrong about change: The adequate choice of the dependent variable and design in prediction of cognitive training success. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20. · DOI
  28. Oppermann, 2018, Uncovering young children’s motivational beliefs about learning science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 399, 10.1002/tea.21424 · DOI
  29. Osborne, 2003a, What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692, 10.1002/tea.10105 · DOI
  30. Osborne, 2003b, Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications, International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049, 10.1080/0950069032000032199 · DOI
  31. Proulx, 2004, Integrating scientific method & critical thinking in classroom debates on environmental issues, The American Biology Teacher, 66, 26, 10.2307/4451613 · DOI
  32. Reilly, D. (2012). Gender, culture, and sex-typed cognitive abilities. PLoS ONE, 7, (6). · DOI
  33. Rubin, 2001, Transition in the making. The images of the future in education and decision-making, Futures, 33, 267, 10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00071-9 · DOI
  34. Salas, 2023, Pensamiento crítico y desarrollo de competencias en estudiantes del sexto ciclo de educación básica regular—Huari—Ancash, 2022, Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7, 4090, 10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i1.4741 · DOI
  35. Shamboul, 2022, The importance of critical thinking on teaching learning process, Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 29, 10.4236/jss.2022.101003 · DOI
  36. Tapung, 2018, Improving students’ critical thinking skills in controlling social problems through the development of emancipatory learning model for junior high school social studies in Ruteng City, Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9, 162
  37. 2020, Evaluación de destrezas de pensamiento crítico: Validación de instrumentos libres de cultura, TED: Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis, 47, 15
  38. Manassero, 2016, Un modelo formativo para mejorar las ideas de los profesores sobre temas de naturaleza de ciencia y tecnología, Profesorado: Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 20, 56, 10.30827/profesorado.v20i2.10408 · DOI
  39. Vieira, 2011, Critical thinking: Conceptual clarification and its importance in science education, Science Education International, 22, 43
  40. Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis, Springer. · DOI
  41. Williams, 2004, Thinking like a scientist about real-world problems: The Cornell institute for research on children science education program, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 107, 10.1016/j.appdev.2003.11.002 · DOI
  42. Windschitl, 2008, Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations, Science Education, 92, 941, 10.1002/sce.20259 · DOI
  43. Zimmerman, 2007, The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school, Developmental Review, 27, 172, 10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001 · DOI
  44. Zohar, 2003, Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive?, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 145, 10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1 · DOI
  45. Zohar, 1994, The effect of the biology critical thinking project on the development of critical thinking, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 183, 10.1002/tea.3660310208 · DOI
  46. Zulkipli, 2020, Identifying scientific reasoning skills of science education students, ASEAN Journal of University Education, 16, 275, 10.24191/ajue.v16i3.10311 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
de los Santos, O., Hernández-Padilla, E., Vázquez-Alonso, Á., López-Aymes, G., Aguilar-Tamayo, M. F., & Arce, E.
Affiliations
  • Doctorado en Psicología, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Cuernavaca 62350, Mexico
  • Center for Transdisciplinary Research in Psychology, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Cuernavaca 62350, Mexico
  • Institute for Educational Research and Innovation, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma, Spain
  • Institute of Education Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Cuernavaca 62209, Mexico
  • Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos (MX)
Venue
Education Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-09-08
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
1174
ISSN
2227-7102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414063048
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8
FWCI
25.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Education Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › STEM Education
Keywords
scientific thinking, critical thinking, primary education, fifth grade students, scientific method instruction, classification, problem solving, decision-making, logical reasoning, early childhood education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review