Cited by 50Underwater Acoustics ResearchAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Side-Scan Sonar Image Classification Based on Style Transfer and Pre-Trained Convolutional Neural Networks

Open access
Ge, Qiang, Ruan, Fengxue, Qiao, Baojun, Zhang, Qian, Zuo, Xianyu, Dang, Lanxue·2021·Electronics

Abstract

Side-scan sonar is widely used in underwater rescue and the detection of undersea targets, such as shipwrecks, aircraft crashes, etc. Automatic object classification plays an important role in the rescue process to reduce the workload of staff and subjective errors caused by visual fatigue. However, the application of automatic object classification in side-scan sonar images is still lacking, which is due to a lack of datasets and the small number of image samples containing specific target objects. Secondly, the real data of side-scan sonar images are unbalanced. Therefore, a side-scan sonar image classification method based on synthetic data and transfer learning is proposed in this paper. In this method, optical images are used as inputs and the style transfer network is employed to simulate the side-scan sonar image to generate “simulated side-scan sonar images”; meanwhile, a convolutional neural network pre-trained on ImageNet is introduced for classification. In this paper, we experimentally demonstrate that the maximum accuracy of target classification is up to 97.32% by fine-tuning the pre-trained convolutional neural network using a training set incorporating “simulated side-scan sonar images”. The results show that the classification accuracy can be effectively improved by combining a pre-trained convolutional neural network and “similar side-scan sonar images”.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/electronics10151823

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A VGG-19 pretrained on ImageNet and fine-tuned with a synthetic dataset generated by style transfer achieved over 97% accuracy in the classification of real sonar images.

    “This work achieved an accuracy of over 97% in the classification of real sonar images for the CNNs that were fine-tuned with the synthetically generated dataset”

    From A Survey of Underwater Acoustic Data Classification Methods Using Deep Learning for Shoreline Surveillance (2022) · cites this paper as [132]

    The Abstract reports a maximum accuracy of 97.32% after fine-tuning an ImageNet-pretrained CNN with a training set containing style-transfer-generated sonar images. Section 4.2.3 says the test images were real, but Table 2 lists the transferred VGG19 model’s five-run average at 96.88%, not over 97%; the result also does not apply to all the CNNs tested. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A model trained with synthetic data generated by neural style transfer can improve both classification accuracy and convergence time.

    “The data were used to balance an uneven dataset, verifying that a model trained with synthetic data can improve both the classification accuracy and the convergence time.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Klaucke, I. Side Scan Sonar. In Submarine Geomorphology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 13-24.
  2. Dobeck, G.J.; Hyland, J.C. Automated detection and classification of sea mines in sonar imagery. Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets II. Int. Soc. Opt. Photonics 1997, 3079, 90-110.
  3. Subetha, T.; Khilar, R.; Christo, M.S. A comparative analysis on plant pathology classification using deep learning architecture- Resnet and VGG19. Mater. Today Proc. 2021. [CrossRef] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ge, Q., Ruan, F., Qiao, B., Zhang, Q., Zuo, X., & Dang, L.
Affiliations
  • Henan University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Dang, Lanxue
Venue
Electronics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-07-29
Volume
10
Issue
15
Pages
1823
ISSN
2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3189916153
Cited by
50
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Electronics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Basic Research Program of China;the Major Project of Science and Technology of Henan Province;National Natural Science Foundation of China;Key Research and Promotion Projects of Henan Province (2019YFE0126600;201400210300;U1704122;212102210393, 202102110121)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Underwater Acoustics Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
side-scan sonar images, underwater target classification, style transfer, synthetic image generation, transfer learning, pre-trained convolutional neural networks, class imbalance, underwater rescue, shipwreck detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review