Cited by 11Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Improved YOLOv3 Model for Workpiece Stud Leakage Detection

Open access
Cong, Peichao, Lv, Kunfeng, Feng, Hao, Zhou, Jiachao·2022·Electronics

Abstract

In this study, a deep convolutional neural network based on an improved You only look once version 3 (YOLOv3) is proposed to improve the accuracy and real-time detection of small targets in complex backgrounds when detecting leaky weld studs on an automotive workpiece. To predict stud locations, the prediction layer of the model increases from three layers to four layers. An image pyramid structure obtains stud feature maps at different scales, and shallow feature fusion at multiple scales obtains stud contour details. Focal loss is added to the loss function to solve the imbalanced sample problem. The reduced weight of simple background classes allows the algorithm to focus on foreground classes, reducing the number of missed weld studs. Moreover, K-medians algorithm replaces the original K-means clustering to improve model robustness. Finally, an image dataset of car body workpiece studs is built for model training and testing. The results reveal that the average detection accuracy of the improved YOLOv3 model is 80.42%, which is higher than the results of Faster R-CNN, single-shot multi-box detector (SSD), and YOLOv3. The detection time per image is just 0.32 s (62.8% and 23.8% faster than SSD and Faster R-CNN, respectively), fulfilling the requirement for stud leakage detection in real-world working environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/electronics11213430

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Cong, P., Lv, K., Feng, H., & Zhou, J.
Affiliations
Guangxi University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Cong, Peichao
  • Lv, Kunfeng
Venue
Electronics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-10-23
Volume
11
Issue
21
Pages
3430
ISSN
2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307270560
Cited by
11
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Electronics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Central Government Guides Local Science and Technology Development Foundation Projects (ZY19183003, AB20058001)
  • Guangxi Key Research and Development Project (ZY19183003, AB20058001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
YOLOv3, small object detection, multi-scale feature fusion, image pyramid, focal loss, class imbalance, k-median clustering, real-time object detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review