Cited by 72Social Robot Interaction and HRIArtificial Intelligence in EducationEducational Robotics and Engineering

A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications of Robots and Natural Language Processing in Education

Open access
Younis, Hussain A., Ruhaiyem, Nur Intan Raihana, Ghaban, Wad, Gazem, Nadhmi A., Nasser, Maged·2023·Electronics

Abstract

Natural language processing (NLP) is the art of investigating others’ positive and cooperative communication and rapprochement with others as well as the art of communicating and speaking with others. Furthermore, NLP techniques may substantially enhance most phases of the information-system lifecycle, facilitate access to information for users, and allow for new paradigms in the usage of information-system services. NLP also has an important role in designing the study, presenting two fields converging on one side and overlapping on the other, namely the field of the NAO-robot world and the field of education, technology, and progress. The selected articles classified the study into four categories: special needs, kindergartens, schools, and universities. Our study looked at accurate keyword research. They are artificial intelligence, learning and teaching, education, NAO robot, undergraduate students, and university. In two fields of twelve journals and citations on reliable/high-reputation scientific sites, 82 scientific articles were extracted. From the Scientific Journal Rankings (SJR) website, the study samples included twelve reliable/high-reputation scientific journals for the period from 2014 to 2023 from well-known scientific journals with a high impact factor. This study evaluated the effect of a systematic literature review of NAO educational robots on language programming. It aimed to be a platform and guide for researchers, interested persons, trainees, supervisors, students, and those interested in the fields of NAO robots and education. All studies recognized the superiority and progress of NAO robots in the educational field. They concluded by urging students to publish in highly influential journals with a high scientific impact within the two fields of study by focusing on the study-sample journals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/electronics12132864

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 101 · Cited by 72

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Internet and Higher Education https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=1696 5&tip=sid&clean=0 81 109 10 Journal of the ACM https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=2312 7&tip=sid&clean=0 123 133 11 Science Robotics https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=2110 0886132&tip=sid&clean=0 30 79 12 Soft Robotics https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=2110 0779064&tip=sid&clean=0 32 63
  2. Bartneck, C. The end of the beginning: A re ection on the rst ve years of the HRI conference. Scientometr. J. 2011, 86, 487-504.
  3. Métais, E. Enhancing information systems management with natural language processing techniques. Data Knowl. Eng. J. 2002, 41, 247-272.
  4. Yang, Y.; Long, Y.; Sun, D.; Van Aalst, J.; Cheng, S. Fostering students' creativity via educational robotics: An investigation of teachers' pedagogical practices based on teacher interviews. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2020, 51, 1826-1842.
  5. Guggemos, J.; Seufert, S.; Sonderegger, S. Humanoid robots in higher education: Evaluating the acceptance of pepper in the context of an academic writing course using the UTAUT. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2020, 51, 1864-1883. References

Authors
Younis, H. A., Ruhaiyem, N. I. R., Ghaban, W., Gazem, N. A., & Nasser, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Basrah (IQ)
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
  • University of Tabuk (SA)
  • Taibah University (SA)
Corresponding author
  • Younis, Hussain A.
  • Ruhaiyem, Nur Intan Raihana
Venue
Electronics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-06-28
Volume
12
Issue
13
Pages
2864
ISSN
2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4382727848
Cited by
72
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Electronics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
Keywords
NAO robot, educational robots, natural language processing in education, special education, kindergarten education, school education, university education, artificial intelligence in education, learning and teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review