The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MSQuant: Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Object Detection via Migration Scale Search
Abstract
YOLO (You Only Look Once) has become the dominant paradigm in real-time object detection. However, deploying real-time object detectors on resource-constrained platforms faces challenges due to high computational and memory demands. Quantization addresses this by compressing and accelerating CNN models through the representation of weights and activations with low-precision values. Nevertheless, the quantization difficulty between weights and activations is often imbalanced. In this work, we propose MSQuant, an efficient post-training quantization (PTQ) method for CNN-based object detectors, which balances the quantization difficulty between activations and weights through migration scale. MSQuant introduces the concept of migration scales to mitigate this disparity, thereby improving overall model accuracy. An alternating search method is employed to optimize the migration scales, avoiding local optima and reducing quantization error. We select YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 models as the PTQ baseline, followed by extensive experiments on the PASCAL VOC, COCO, and DOTA datasets to explore various combinations of quantization methods. The results demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of MSQuant. Our approach consistently outperforms other methods, showing significant improvements in quantization performance and model accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers
Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., & Zagoruyko, S. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13 · Cited by 18,285
EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection
Tan, M., Pang, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · Cited by 9,841
ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design
Ma, N., Zhang, X., Zheng, H.-T., & Sun, J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_8 · Cited by 7,356
A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference
Gholami, A., Kim, S., Dong, Z., Yao, Z., Mahoney, M. W., & Keutzer, K. (2022) · Low-Power Computer Vision · doi:10.1201/9781003162810-13 · Cited by 1,219
AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for On-Device LLM Compression and Acceleration
Lin, J., Tang, J., Tang, H., Yang, S., Xiao, G., & Han, S. (2025) · GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications · doi:10.1145/3714983.3714987 · Cited by 274
SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Models
Xiao, G., Lin, J., Seznec, M., Wu, H., Demouth, J., & Han, S. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.10438 · Cited by 247
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Ghani, 2024, An Optimised CNN Hardware Accelerator Applicable to IoT End Nodes for Disruptive Healthcare, IoT, 5, 901, 10.3390/iot5040041 · DOI
- Zhang, 2023, Learning scattering similarity and texture-based attention with convolutional neural networks for PolSAR image classification, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 61, 5207419
- Pan, 2024, Wavelet Tree Transformer: Multi-Head Attention with Frequency Selective Representation and Interaction for Remote Sensing Object Detection, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 62, 5637023, 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3442575 · DOI
- Wei, H., Wang, Z., and Ni, Y. (2024). Hierarchical Mixed-Precision Post-Training Quantization for SAR Ship Detection Networks. Remote Sens., 16. · DOI
- Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., and Malik, J. (2014, January 23–28). Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, OH, USA. · DOI · Paper page
- Girshick, R. (2015). Fast r-cnn. arXiv. · DOI · Paper page
- He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollár, P., and Girshick, R. (2017, January 22–29). Mask r-cnn. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy. · DOI · Paper page
- Howard, A.G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., and Adam, H. (2017). MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv.
- Xiong, Y., Liu, H., Gupta, S., Akin, B., Bender, G., Wang, Y., Kindermans, P.J., Tan, M., Singh, V., and Chen, B. (2021). MobileDets: Searching for Object Detection Architectures for Mobile Accelerators. arXiv. · DOI · Paper page
- Li, H., Samet, H., Kadav, A., Durdanovic, I., and Graf, H.P. (2017, January 24–26). Pruning filters for efficient convnets. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2017, Toulon, France.
- Liu, Z., Li, J., Shen, Z., Huang, G., Yan, S., and Zhang, C. (2017). Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimming. arXiv. · DOI · Paper page
- Liang, Z., Wang, W., Meng, R., Yang, H., Wang, J., Gao, H., Li, B., and Fan, J. (2024). Vehicle and Pedestrian Detection Based on Improved YOLOv7-Tiny. Electronics, 13. · DOI
- Alam, S., Yakopcic, C., Wu, Q., Barnell, M., Khan, S., and Taha, T.M. (2024). Survey of deep learning accelerators for edge and emerging computing. Electronics, 13. · DOI
- Esser, S.K., McKinstry, J.L., Bablani, D., Appuswamy, R., and Modha, D.S. (2020). Learned Step Size Quantization. arXiv.
- Choi, J., Wang, Z., Venkataramani, S., Chuang, P.I.J., Srinivasan, V., and Gopalakrishnan, K. (2018). PACT: Parameterized Clipping Activation for Quantized Neural Networks. arXiv.
- Zhou, S., Wu, Y., Ni, Z., Zhou, X., Wen, H., and Zou, Y. (2018). DoReFa-Net: Training Low Bitwidth Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Bitwidth Gradients. arXiv.
- Li, R., Wang, Y., Liang, F., Qin, H., Yan, J., and Fan, R. (2019, January 15–20). Fully Quantized Network for Object Detection. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA. · DOI · Paper page
- Migacz, S. (2017, January 8–11). 8-bit inference with tensorrt. Proceedings of the GPU Technology Conference, Virtual.
- Li, J., Chen, G., Jin, M., Mao, W., and Lu, H. (2024). AE-Qdrop: Towards Accurate and Efficient Low-Bit Post-Training Quantization for a Convolutional Neural Network. Electronics, 13. · DOI
- Nagel, M., van Baalen, M., Blankevoort, T., and Welling, M. (2019). Data-Free Quantization Through Weight Equalization and Bias Correction. arXiv. · DOI · Paper page
- Wu, D., Tang, Q., Zhao, Y., Zhang, M., Fu, Y., and Zhang, D. (2020). EasyQuant: Post-training Quantization via Scale Optimization. arXiv.
- Nagel, M., Fournarakis, M., Amjad, R.A., Bondarenko, Y., van Baalen, M., and Blankevoort, T. (2021). A White Paper on Neural Network Quantization. arXiv.
- Xu, S., Li, Y., Lin, M., Gao, P., Guo, G., Lu, J., and Zhang, B. (2023). Q-DETR: An Efficient Low-Bit Quantized Detection Transformer. arXiv. · DOI
- Huang, Y., Yang, H., Dong, Z., Gudovskiy, D., Okuno, T., Nakata, Y., Du, Y., Zhang, S., and Keutzer, K. (2023). Output Sensitivity-Aware DETR Quantization, AAAI.
- Wang, M., Sun, H., Shi, J., Liu, X., Zhang, B., and Cao, X. (2023). Q-YOLO: Efficient Inference for Real-time Object Detection. arXiv. · DOI
- Deng, 2023, GradQuant: Low-Loss Quantization for Remote-Sensing Object Detection, IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett., 20, 6009505, 10.1109/LGRS.2023.3308582 · DOI
- Everingham, 2010, The PASCAL Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 88, 303, 10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Lin, T.Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Bourdev, L., Girshick, R., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Zitnick, C.L., and Dollár, P. (2014). Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context. Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, 6–12 September 2014; Proceedings, Part V 13, Springer.
- Ding, 2021, Object Detection in Aerial Images: A Large-Scale Benchmark and Challenges, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 44, 7778, 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3117983 · DOI · Paper page
- Lv, C., Chen, H., Guo, J., Ding, Y., and Liu, X. (2024, January 16–22). PTQ4SAM: Post-Training Quantization for Segment Anything. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA. · DOI
- Liu, X., Ding, X., Yu, L., Xi, Y., Li, W., Tu, Z., Hu, J., Chen, H., Yin, B., and Xiong, Z. (2025, January 26–27). PQ-SAM: Post-training Quantization for Segment Anything Model. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Paris, France. · DOI
- Tang, S., Wang, X., Chen, H., Guan, C., Wu, Z., Tang, Y., and Zhu, W. (2025, January 26–27). Post-training quantization with progressive calibration and activation relaxing for text-to-image diffusion models. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Paris, France. · DOI
- Cheng, T., Song, L., Ge, Y., Liu, W., Wang, X., and Shan, Y. (2024, January 16–22). Yolo-world: Real-time open-vocabulary object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA. · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, Z., Li, C., Qu, T., He, C., & Wang, D.
- Venue
- Electronics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-01-26
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 504
- ISSN
- 2079-9292
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review