Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Effective Switching Algorithm for Single Phase Matrix Converter in Induction Heating Applications

Kumar, Anand, Kumar Sadhu, Pradip, Kumar Mohanta, Dusmanta, Bharata Reddy, Maddikara Jaya·2018·Electronics

Abstract

Prevalent converters for induction heating (IH) applications employ two-stage conversion for generating high-frequency magnetic field, namely, AC to DC and then DC to high-frequency AC (HFAC). This research embarks upon a direct conversion of utility AC to high frequency AC with the design of a single-phase matrix converter (SPMC) as a resonant converter using a modified switching technique for IH application. The efficacy of the proposed approach is validated through different attributes such as unity power factor, sinusoidal input current and low total harmonic distortion (THD). The developed prototype-embedded system has high pragmatic deployment potential owing to its cost effectiveness using Arduino mega 2560 and high voltage/current as well as low switching time IXRH40N120 insulated-gate bipolar transistor (IGBT). Different results of the prototype-embedded system for IH application have been verified using Matlab Simulink environment to corroborate its efficacy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/electronics7080149

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 ( a ) 1-ø matrix converter topology and ( b ) bi-directional switch (common emitter configuration mode). Figure 2. ( a ) 1-ø matrix converter topology and ( b ) bi-directional switch (common emitter configuration mode). POT IH coil
Figure 2 ( a ) 1-ø matrix converter topology and ( b ) bi-directional switch (common emitter configuration mode). Figure 2. ( a ) 1-ø matrix converter topology and ( b ) bi-directional switch (common emitter configuration mode). POT IH coilCC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Power circuit of SPMC and its output voltage waveform ( a ) SPMC as a resonant converter for (IH) application; ( b ) Output voltage waveform of SPMC as frequency changer operation (at 100 Hz output) and ( c ) Output voltage waveform of SPMC as resonant converter (at HF output) using modified switching technique. Figure 4. Power circuit of SPMC and its output voltage waveform ( a ) SPMC as a resonant converter for (IH) application; ( b ) Output voltage waveform of SPMC as frequency changer operation (at 100 Hz output) and ( c ) Output voltage waveform of SPMC as resonant converter (at HF output) using modified switching technique.
Figure 4 Power circuit of SPMC and its output voltage waveform ( a ) SPMC as a resonant converter for (IH) application; ( b ) Output voltage waveform of SPMC as frequency changer operation (at 100 Hz output) and ( c ) Output voltage waveform of SPMC as resonant converter (at HF output) using modified switching technique. Figure 4. Power circuit of SPMC and its output voltage waveform ( a ) SPMC as a resonant converter for (IH) application; ( b ) Output voltage waveform of SPMC as frequency changer operation (at 100 Hz output) and ( c ) Output voltage waveform of SPMC as resonant converter (at HF output) using modified switching technique.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Positive mode of operation ( a ) Mode 1 and ( b ) Mode 2. Figure 5. Positive mode of operation ( a ) Mode 1 and ( b ) Mode 2.
Figure 5 Positive mode of operation ( a ) Mode 1 and ( b ) Mode 2. Figure 5. Positive mode of operation ( a ) Mode 1 and ( b ) Mode 2.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 Negative mode of operation ( a ) Mode 3 and ( b ) Mode 4. Figure 6. Negative mode of operation ( a ) Mode 3 and ( b ) Mode 4.
Figure 6 Negative mode of operation ( a ) Mode 3 and ( b ) Mode 4. Figure 6. Negative mode of operation ( a ) Mode 3 and ( b ) Mode 4.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 8 Simulated waveforms of ( a ) input voltage ( Vin ) ( b ) input current ( Iin ) and ( c ) THD analysis of input current ( Iin ). Figure 8. Simulated waveforms of ( a ) input voltage ( Vin ) ( b ) input current ( I in ) and ( c ) THD analysis of input current ( I in ).
Figure 8 Simulated waveforms of ( a ) input voltage ( Vin ) ( b ) input current ( Iin ) and ( c ) THD analysis of input current ( Iin ). Figure 8. Simulated waveforms of ( a ) input voltage ( Vin ) ( b ) input current ( I in ) and ( c ) THD analysis of input current ( I in ).CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 9
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 9 Simulated waveforms of ( a ) Output voltage ( Vout ) and ( b ) Output current ( Iout ) at 100 Hz. Figure 9. Simulated waveforms of ( a ) Output voltage ( Vout ) and ( b ) Output current ( Iout ) at 100 Hz. Figure 9. Simulated waveforms of ( a ) Output voltage ( Vout ) and ( b ) Output current ( Iout ) at 100 Hz.
Figure 9 Simulated waveforms of ( a ) Output voltage ( Vout ) and ( b ) Output current ( Iout ) at 100 Hz. Figure 9. Simulated waveforms of ( a ) Output voltage ( Vout ) and ( b ) Output current ( Iout ) at 100 Hz. Figure 9. Simulated waveforms of ( a ) Output voltage ( Vout ) and ( b ) Output current ( Iout ) at 100 Hz.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 11
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 12
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 13
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 13 Experimental setup of ( a ) SPMC and its ( b ) bi-directional switch. Figure 13. Experimental setup of ( a ) SPMC and its ( b ) bi-directional switch.
Figure 13 Experimental setup of ( a ) SPMC and its ( b ) bi-directional switch. Figure 13. Experimental setup of ( a ) SPMC and its ( b ) bi-directional switch.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 14 ( a ) Experimental results of ZCD and microcontroller output. (Scale: 5 V/div) and ( b ) experimental validation of synchronized output w.r.t. pulses. (Scale: output voltage, 75 V/div and Time, 10 ms/div). Figure 14. ( a ) Experimental results of ZCD and microcontroller output. (Scale: 5 V/div) and ( b ) experimental validation of synchronized output w.r.t. pulses. (Scale: output voltage, 75 V/div and Time, 10 ms/div). ( a ) ( b ) Figure 14. ( a ) Experimental results of ZCD and microcontroller output. (Scale: 5 V/div) and ( b ) experimental validation of synchronized output w.r.t. pulses. (Scale: output voltage, 75 V/div and
Figure 14 ( a ) Experimental results of ZCD and microcontroller output. (Scale: 5 V/div) and ( b ) experimental validation of synchronized output w.r.t. pulses. (Scale: output voltage, 75 V/div and Time, 10 ms/div). Figure 14. ( a ) Experimental results of ZCD and microcontroller output. (Scale: 5 V/div) and ( b ) experimental validation of synchronized output w.r.t. pulses. (Scale: output voltage, 75 V/div and Time, 10 ms/div). ( a ) ( b ) Figure 14. ( a ) Experimental results of ZCD and microcontroller output. (Scale: 5 V/div) and ( b ) experimental validation of synchronized output w.r.t. pulses. (Scale: output voltage, 75 V/div andCC-BY · From the PDF
Image 16
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 17
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 18
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 18 Experimental results of output voltage w.r.t. input current (Scale: Output voltage, 75 V/div; input current, 1 A/div; and Time, 10 ms/div). Figure 18. Experimental results of output voltage w.r.t. input current (Scale: Output voltage, 75 V/div; input current, 1 A/div; and Time, 10 ms/div).
Figure 18 Experimental results of output voltage w.r.t. input current (Scale: Output voltage, 75 V/div; input current, 1 A/div; and Time, 10 ms/div). Figure 18. Experimental results of output voltage w.r.t. input current (Scale: Output voltage, 75 V/div; input current, 1 A/div; and Time, 10 ms/div).CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Acero, 2010, Domestic induction appliances, IEEE Ind. Appl. Mag., 16, 39, 10.1109/MIAS.2009.935495 · DOI
  2. Sarnago, 2013, Modulation scheme for improved operation of an RB-IGBT-based resonant inverter applied to domestic induction heating, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 60, 2066, 10.1109/TIE.2012.2207652 · DOI
  3. Sarnago, 2013, Class-D/DE dual-mode-operation resonant converter for improved-efficiency domestic induction heating system, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 28, 1274, 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2206405 · DOI
  4. Lucia, 2009, Load-adaptive control algorithm of half-bridge series resonant inverter for domestic induction heating, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 56, 3106, 10.1109/TIE.2009.2022516 · DOI
  5. Maussion, 2011, Induction heating technology and its applications: Past Developments, current Technology, and future challenges, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 61, 2509
  6. Mishima, 2014, A new current phasor-controlled ZVS twin half-bridge high-frequency resonant inverter for induction heating, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 61, 2531, 10.1109/TIE.2013.2274420 · DOI
  7. Saha, 2014, High Power Density Series Resonant Inverter Using an Auxiliary Switched Capacitor Cell for Induction Heating Applications, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 29, 1909, 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2265984 · DOI
  8. Acero, 2010, Efficiency-oriented design of ZVS half-bridge series resonant inverter with variable frequency duty cycle control, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 25, 1671, 10.1109/TPEL.2010.2042461 · DOI
  9. Sarnago, 2016, Dual-Output Boost Resonant Full-Bridge Topology and its Modulation Strategies for High-Performance Induction Heating Applications, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 63, 3554, 10.1109/TIE.2016.2530780 · DOI
  10. Singh, B., and Pandey, R. (2016, January 4–6). Improved Power Quality Buck-Boost Converter fed LLC Resonant Converter for Induction Heater. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Power Systems (ICPS), New Delhi, India. · DOI
  11. Pham, H., Fujita, H., Ozaki, K., and Uchida, N. (2011, January 17–22). Dynamic analysis and control of a zone-control induction heating system. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE conference of Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition(ECCE), Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  12. Fujita, 1996, Pulse-Density-Modulated Power Control of a 4 kW, 450 kHz Voltage-Source Inverter for Induction Melting Applications, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 32, 279, 10.1109/28.491475 · DOI
  13. Grajales, L., Sabatk, J.A., Wang, K.R., Tabisz, W.A., and Lee, F.C. (1993, January 2–8). Design of a 10 kW, 500 kHz Phase-Shift Controlled Series-Resonant Inverter for Induction Heating. Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE Industry Applications Conference Twenty-Eighth IAS Annual Meeting, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  14. Yilmaz, 2012, Medium-frequency induction melting furnace as a load on the power system, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 48, 1203, 10.1109/TIA.2012.2199457 · DOI
  15. Millan, 2011, Series resonant inverter with selective harmonic operation applied to all-metal domestic induction heating, IET Power Electron., 4, 587, 10.1049/iet-pel.2010.0107 · DOI
  16. Koertzen, H.W., Van Wyk, J.D., and Ferreira, J.A. (1995, January 18–22). Design of the half-bridge series resonant converters for induction cooking. Proceedings of the Power Electronics Specialist Conference (PESC), Atlanta, GA, USA.
  17. Dawson, 1991, A Comparison of Load Commutated Inverter Systems for Induction Heating and Melting Applications, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 6, 430, 10.1109/63.85911 · DOI
  18. Koertzen, H.W., Ferreira, J.A., and Van Wyk, J.D. (July, January 29). A comparative study of single switch induction heating converters using novel component effectivity concepts. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC), Toledo, Spain.
  19. Jimenez, 2014, An FPGA-based gain-scheduled controller for resonant converters applied to induction cooktops, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 29, 2143, 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2276041 · DOI
  20. Nagarajan, 2015, Phase locked loop based pulse density modulation scheme for the power control of induction heating applications, J. Power Electron., 15, 65, 10.6113/JPE.2015.15.1.65 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Idris, Z., Hamzah, M.K., and Saidon, M.F. (2006, January 18–22). Implementation of single-phase matrix converter as a direct AC–AC converter with commutation strategies. Proceedings of the 2006 37th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Jeju, South Korea. · DOI
  22. Li, 2012, A direct AC–AC converter for inductive power-transfer systems, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 27, 661, 10.1109/TPEL.2011.2159397 · DOI
  23. Arevalo, 2010, Control and implementation of a matrix-converter-based AC ground power-supply unit for aircraft servicing, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 57, 2076, 10.1109/TIE.2009.2034180 · DOI
  24. Kolar, 2007, Novel three-Phase AC–AC sparse matrix converters, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 22, 1649, 10.1109/TPEL.2007.904178 · DOI
  25. Trentin, 2012, Automated optimal design of input filters for direct ac/ac matrix converters, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 59, 2811, 10.1109/TIE.2011.2163283 · DOI
  26. Yamamoto, 2011, Development of MCs and its applications in industry, IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag., 5, 4, 10.1109/MIE.2011.940249 · DOI
  27. Hosseini, S.H., Sharifian, M.B., Sabahi, M., Yazdanpanah, A., and Gharehpetian, G.H. (2008, January 4–7). Bi-directional power electronic transformer for induction heating systems. Proceedings of the 2008 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada. · DOI
  28. Kim, 1988, Characteristics and Starting Method of a Cycloconverter With a Tank Circuit for Induction Heating, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 3, 236, 10.1109/63.4354 · DOI
  29. Sugimura, H., Mun, S.P., Kwon, S.K., Mishima, T., and Nakaoka, M. (July, January 30). Direct AC–AC resonant converter using one-chip reverse blocking IGBT-Based bidirectional switches for HF induction heaters. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Cambridge, UK.
  30. Salehifar, M., Moreno-eguilaz, M., Sala, V., and Romeral, L. (2013, January 17–21). A Novel AC–AC Converter Based SiC for Domestic Induction Cooking Applications. Proceedings of the 2013 28th Twenty-Eighth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Long Beach, CA, USA. · DOI
  31. Nguyen-Quang, N., Stone, D.A., Bingham, C.M., and Foster, M.P. (2006, January 23–26). Single phase matrix converter for radio frequency induction heating. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM), Taormina, Italy.
  32. Mohite, S.B., and Gujarathi, P.K. (2010, January 14–16). A Design and Implementation of a Novel Multimode Single Phase Matrix Converter. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Power Electronics Electrical Drives Automation and Motion SPEEDAM, Pisa, Italy. · DOI
  33. Nguyen-Quang, N., Stone, D.A., Bingham, C.M., and Foster, M.P. (2009, January 8–10). A three-phase to single-phase matrix converter for high-frequency induction heating. Proceedings of the 2009 13th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Barcelona, Spain.
  34. Nguyen-Quang, N., Stone, D.A., Bingham, C.M., and Foster, M.P. (2007, January 2–5). Comparison of single-phase matrix converter and H-bridge converter for radio frequency induction heating. Proceedings of the 2007 European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Aalborg, Denmark. · DOI
  35. Jose, P.S., Deepika, N.C., and Nisha, S.N. (2011, January 23–24). Applications of single phase matrix converter. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical and Computer Technology, Nagercoil, India. · DOI
  36. Kumar, 2011, A Survey on High-Frequency Inverter and Their Power Control Techniques for Induction Heating Applications, J. Power Technol., 97, 201

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, A., Kumar Sadhu, P., Kumar Mohanta, D., & Bharata Reddy, M. J.
Venue
Electronics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-08-18
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
149
ISSN
2079-9292
Cited by
21
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.