Cited by 179Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Defect detection in printed circuit boards using you-only-look-once convolutional neural networks

Open access
Adibhatla, Venkat Anil, Chih, Huan-Chuang, Hsu, Chi-Chang, Cheng, Joseph, Abbod, Maysam F., Shieh, Jiann-Shing·2020·Electronics

Abstract

In this study, a deep learning algorithm based on the you-only-look-once (YOLO) approach is proposed for the quality inspection of printed circuit boards (PCBs). The high accuracy and efficiency of deep learning algorithms has resulted in their increased adoption in every field. Similarly, accurate detection of defects in PCBs by using deep learning algorithms, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has garnered considerable attention. In the proposed method, highly skilled quality inspection engineers first use an interface to record and label defective PCBs. The data are then used to train a YOLO/CNN model to detect defects in PCBs. In this study, 11,000 images and a network of 24 convolutional layers and 2 fully connected layers were used. The proposed model achieved a defect detection accuracy of 98.79% in PCBs with a batch size of 32.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/electronics9091547

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Takada, Y.; Shiina, T.; Usami, H.; Iwahori, Y. Defect Detection and Classification of Electronic Circuit Boards Using Keypoint Extraction and CNN Features. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conferences on Pervasive Patterns and Applications Defect, Athens, Greece, 19-23 February 2017; pp. 113-116.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adibhatla, V. A., Chih, H.-C., Hsu, C.-C., Cheng, J., Abbod, M. F., & Shieh, J.-S.
Affiliations
  • Yuan Ze University (TW)
  • Department of Advanced manufacturing system, Boardtek Electronics Corporation, Taoyuan 328454, Taiwan
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Abbod, Maysam F.
Venue
Electronics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-09-22
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
1547
ISSN
2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3088490277
Cited by
179
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 1
FWCI
16.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Electronics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
printed circuit board defect detection, YOLO, object detection, quality inspection, convolutional neural networks, image-based defect classification, automated visual inspection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review