The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electric Vehicle Charging Load Forecasting: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches
Open accessAbstract
Load forecasting is one of the major challenges of power system operation and is crucial to the effective scheduling for economic dispatch at multiple time scales. Numerous load forecasting methods have been proposed for household and commercial demand, as well as for loads at various nodes in a power grid. However, compared with conventional loads, the uncoordinated charging of the large penetration of plug-in electric vehicles is different in terms of periodicity and fluctuation, which renders current load forecasting techniques ineffective. Deep learning methods, empowered by unprecedented learning ability from extensive data, provide novel approaches for solving challenging forecasting tasks. This research proposes a comparative study of deep learning approaches to forecast the super-short-term stochastic charging load of plug-in electric vehicles. Several popular and novel deep-learning based methods have been utilized in establishing the forecasting models using minute-level real-world data of a plug-in electric vehicle charging station to compare the forecasting performance. Numerical results of twelve cases on various time steps show that deep learning methods obtain high accuracy in super-short-term plug-in electric load forecasting. Among the various deep learning approaches, the long-short-term memory method performs the best by reducing over 30% forecasting error compared with the conventional artificial neural network model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks
Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., & Larochelle, H. (2007) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0024 · Cited by 4,841
Modeling of Load Demand Due to EV Battery Charging in Distribution Systems
Qian, K., Zhou, C., Allan, M., & Yuan, Y. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2010.2057456 · Cited by 1,268
Zheng, H., Yuan, J., & Chen, L. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10081168 · Cited by 635
Cited by
Daily electric vehicle charging load profiles considering demographics of vehicle users
Zhang, J., Yan, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., & Lv, G. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115063 · Cited by 259
Li, Y., He, S., Li, Y., Ge, L., Lou, S., & Zeng, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2022.3168577 · Cited by 132
Ensemble Learning for Charging Load Forecasting of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
Huang, X., Wu, D., & Boulet, B. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Electric Power and Energy Conference (EPEC) · doi:10.1109/epec48502.2020.9319916 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, J., Yang, Z., Mourshed, M., Guo, Y., Zhou, Y., Chang, Y., Wei, Y., & Feng, S.
- Venue
- Energies
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-07-13
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2692
- ISSN
- 1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2962444989
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electric Vehicle Charging Load Forecasting: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/en12142692
- The paper
- Zhu, J., Yang, Z., Mourshed, M., Guo, Y., Zhou, Y., Chang, Y., Wei, Y., & Feng, S. (2019). Electric Vehicle Charging Load Forecasting: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12142692
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.