The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blockchain in Energy Efficiency: Potential Applications and Benefits
Open accessAbstract
Blockchain technology is ready to disrupt nearly every industry and business model, and the energy sector is no exception. Energy businesses across the world have already started exploring the use of blockchain technology in large-scale energy trading systems, peer-to-peer energy trading, project financing, supply chain tracking, and asset management among other applications. Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) recently started revolutionizing the energy landscape, and now blockchain technology is providing an additional opportunity to make the energy system more intelligent, efficient, transparent, and secure in the longer term. The idea of this paper is to examine more closely the use of blockchain technology for its possible application in the energy efficiency industry and to determine how it could make energy efficiency markets more secure and transparent in the longer term. This paper examines in detail the key benefits and implications of using blockchain in the energy efficiency sector through the presentation and discussion of two case studies as possible blockchain applications—(i) the UK Energy Company Obligation scheme and (ii) the Italian White Certificate Scheme. We have presented how the key issues around trading energy efficiency savings—correctly estimating the savings, data transparency among stakeholders, and inefficient administrative processes—can be solved through the application of a blockchain-based smart contract system. Finally, this paper presents an implementation of a smart contract for trading of energy-saving certificates achieved via execution of smart contract transactions on the Ethereum blockchain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blockchain technology in the energy sector: a systematic review of challenges and opportunities
Andoni, M., Robu, V., Flynn, D., Abram, S., Geach, D., Jenkins, D., McCallum, P., & Peacock, A. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.014 · Cited by 2,426
Cited by
A Blockchain-Based Smart Contract System for Healthcare Management
Khatoon, A. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9010094 · Cited by 508
Self-citationSmartBlock-SDN: An Optimized Blockchain-SDN Framework for Resource Management in IoT
Rahman, A., Islam, M. J., Montieri, A., Nasir, M. K., Reza, M. M., Band, S. S., Pescape, A., Hasan, M., Sookhak, M., & Mosavi, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3058244 · Cited by 187
Drones’ Edge Intelligence Over Smart Environments in B5G: Blockchain and Federated Learning Synergy
Alsamhi, S. H., Almalki, F. A., Afghah, F., Hawbani, A., Shvetsov, A. V., Lee, B., & Song, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tgcn.2021.3132561 · Cited by 139
State-of-the-Art Research in Blockchain of Things for HealthCare
Almalki, J. (2024) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-023-07896-5 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Khatoon, A., Verma, P., Southernwood, J., Massey, B., & Corcoran, P.
- Venue
- Energies
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-08-28
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3317
- ISSN
- 1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2970687220
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockchain in Energy Efficiency: Potential Applications and Benefits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/en12173317
- The paper
- Khatoon, A., Verma, P., Southernwood, J., Massey, B., & Corcoran, P. (2019). Blockchain in Energy Efficiency: Potential Applications and Benefits. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.