Cited by 61Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureVehicle emissions and performanceEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Research on Carbon Emissions of Electric Vehicles throughout the Life Cycle Assessment Taking into Vehicle Weight and Grid Mix Composition

Open access
Li, Yanmei, Ha, Ningning, Li, Tingting·2019·Energies

Abstract

To study the impact of the promotion of electric vehicles on carbon emissions in China, the full life carbon emissions of electric vehicles are studied on the basis of considering such factors as vehicle weight and grid mix composition, and fuel vehicles are added for comparison. In this paper, we collect data for 34 domestic electric vehicles, and linear regression analysis is used to model the relationship between vehicle weight and energy consumption. Then, a Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment method is used to establish the life cycle carbon emission calculation model for electric vehicles and fuel vehicles. Finally, the life cycle carbon emissions of electric vehicles and fuel vehicles under different electrical energy structures are discussed using scenario analysis. The results show that under the current grid mix composition in China, the carbon emissions of electric vehicles of the same vehicle weight class are 24% to 31% higher than that of fuel vehicles. As the proportion of clean energy in the grid mix composition increases, the advantages of electric vehicles to reduce carbon emissions will gradually emerge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en12193612

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ambient weather conditions have rarely been incorporated into national and regional environmental breakeven studies.

    “yet have rarely been incorporated into national and regional environmental breakeven studies (e.g., [34-36]).”

    From A National and Regional Greenhouse Gas Breakeven Assessment of EVs across North America (2023) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies vehicle weight, battery capacity, range, and grid mix—not ambient weather—as factors studied, and the Conclusions (page unavailable) compare electric- and fuel-vehicle emissions under different grid mixes. This makes the paper a relevant example of a national emissions comparison that does not appear to incorporate weather, but it does not establish that weather is rarely incorporated across national and regional breakeven studies. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • National results only provide a general depiction of average performance and regional results are needed for more targeted interventions.

    “illustrating how the many studies (e.g., [34,35,39,43] which discuss national results only provide a general depiction of average performance and that regional results are needed for more targeted interventions.”

    From A National and Regional Greenhouse Gas Breakeven Assessment of EVs across North America (2023) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Data Name Source section describes grid-mix estimates for China based on national data, and the Introduction says grid composition affects electric-vehicle emissions. This supports the characterization of the paper as a national-level analysis, but our copy does not say that national results merely depict average performance or that regional results are needed for targeted interventions (searched: regional, national average, and grid mix). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Shen, W.; Zhang, A.L.; Han, W.J. Comparative study on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission of alternative fuels for vehicles. Nat. Gas Ind. 2006, 11, 148-152.
  2. Shen, W.; Zhang, A.L.; Han, W.J. Comparative analysis of vehicle synthetic fuel energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission. J. Tsinghua Univ. 2007, 3, 441-444.
  3. Ou, X.M.; Zhang, X.L.; Qin, Y.N.; Qi, T.Y. Life cycle analysis of future coal-driven electric vehicles. J. Coal 2010, 35, 169-172.
  4. Shi, X.Q.; Sun, Z.X.; Li, X.N.; Li, J.Y.; Yang, J.X. Comparative study on the environmental impact of life cycle of electric taxi and fuel taxi in Beijing. Environ. Sci. 2015, 3, 1105-1116.
  5. Song, Y.H.; Li, B.W.; Hu, Z.C. Analysis of carbon emission regional characteristics of electric vehicles in China. China Energy 2013, 35, 12-16.
  6. Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.F.; Wang, J.J. Comparative analysis of life cycle environmental impact of electric and internal combustion engine vehicles. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 3, 931-940.
  7. Feng, C.; Wang, K.; Xu, Z.Q.; Gong, P.Q. Research on greenhouse gas emission of private electric vehicles based on hybrid life cycle method. Chin. Popul. Resour. Environ. 2017, 27, 178-187.
  8. Wang, C.B.; Zahng, X.; Pang, M.Y. Review of life cycle evaluation methods-Development and application of hybrid life cycle evaluation. J. Nat. Resour. 2015, 30, 1232-1242.
  9. Li, X.H.; Ji, J.P.; Ma, X.M.; Wang, J.T. Research on greenhouse gas emission of fuel ethanol life cycle based on EIO-LCA. J. Peking Univ. 2011, 47, 1081-1088.
  10. IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University: London, UK, 2013.
  11. Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.F.; Wang, J.J. Comparative analysis of the environmental impact of the power system life cycle of electric and fuel vehicles. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 17, 53-64.
  12. Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China. China Transport Statistical Yearbook 2015; China Communications Press: Beijing, China, 2015.
  13. China Electricity Council. National Electric Power Process Statistics Express List; China Electricity Council Press: Beijing, China, 2018.
  14. National Bureau of Statistic. National People's Republic of China 2018 National Economic and Social Development Gazette; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2018.
  15. Gao, Y.B.; Mao, X.Q.; Yang, S.Q. Analysis and evaluation of energy-saving and emission reduction effects of new-energy cars based on LCA. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 33, 1504-1512.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Ha, N., & Li, T.
Affiliations
North China Electric Power University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ha, Ningning
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-09-21
Volume
12
Issue
19
Pages
3612
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2973310688
Cited by
61
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Hebei Province Social Science Fund (HB15YJ038)
  • Hebei Province Soft Science Foundation (16454302D)
  • Central College Fund of North China Electric Power University (2014MS150)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
electric vehicles, life cycle carbon emissions, vehicle weight, electricity mix, energy consumption, hybrid life cycle assessment, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review