The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A Review and Analysis of Paradigm Shift for the People, Organization and Technology
Open accessAbstract
The industry is a key driver of economic development. However, changes caused by introduction of modern technologies, and increasing complexity of products and production, directly affect the industrial enterprises and workers. The critics of the Industry 4.0 paradigm emphasized its orientation to new technologies and digitalization in a technocratic way. Therefore, the new industrial paradigm Industry 5.0 appeared very soon and automatically triggered a debate about the role of, and reasons for applying, the new paradigm. Industry 5.0 is complementing the existing Industry 4.0 paradigm with the orientation to the worker who has an important role in the production process, and that role has been emphasized during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this research, there is a brief discussion on main drivers and enablers for introduction of these new paradigms, then a literature-based analysis is carried out to highlight the differences between two paradigms from three important aspects—people, organization, and technology. The conclusion emphasizes the main features and concerns regarding the movement towards Industry 5.0, and the general conclusion is that there is a significant change of the main research aims from sustainability towards human-centricity. At the end, the analysis of maturity models that evaluates enterprises’ readiness to introduce features of new paradigms is given as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4 · Cited by 4,276 · cited 1×
“The Industry 4.0 is based on the concept of smart factory, where smart products, machines, storage systems, and data unite in the form of the cyber-physical production systems [8,9].”
BackgroundInfluentialIndustry 4.0: state of the art and future trends
Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806 · Cited by 3,221
Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception
Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006 · Cited by 2,557
Cloud computing — The business perspective
Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., & Ghalsasi, A. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.006 · Cited by 2,364
Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies
Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 · Cited by 2,143
Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management
Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.001 · Cited by 2,046
Past, present and future of Industry 4.0—A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal
Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. D. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576 · Cited by 2,036
Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0
Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129 · Cited by 1,893
A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040 · Cited by 1,766
Wollschlaeger, M., Sauter, T., & Jasperneite, J. (2017) · IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine · doi:10.1109/mie.2017.2649104 · Cited by 1,726
Cited by
AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications
Rashid, A. B., & Kausik, M. A. K. (2024) · Hybrid Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100277 · Cited by 764
Industry 4.0 vs. Industry 5.0: Co-existence, Transition, or a Hybrid
Golovianko, M., Terziyan, V., Branytskyi, V., & Malyk, D. (2023) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.206 · Cited by 341
Maturity Assessment for Industry 5.0: A Review of Existing Maturity Models
Hein-Pensel, F., Winkler, H., Brückner, A., Wölke, M., Jabs, I., Mayan, I. J., Kirschenbaum, A., Friedrich, J., & Zinke-Wehlmann, C. (2023) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.12.009 · Cited by 215
Lv, Z. (2023) · Research · doi:10.34133/research.0071 · Cited by 108
“[51] noted that the network security data transmission, storage, and analysis technology were the basics of 5IR.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Zizic, M. C., Mladineo, M., Gjeldum, N., & Celent, L.
- Venue
- Energies
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-07-19
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5221
- ISSN
- 1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4285795935
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 40.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A Review and Analysis of Paradigm Shift for the People, Organization and Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/en15145221
- The paper
- Zizic, M. C., Mladineo, M., Gjeldum, N., & Celent, L. (2022). From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A Review and Analysis of Paradigm Shift for the People, Organization and Technology. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15145221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
