Cited by 30Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesThermal and Kinetic AnalysisMunicipal Solid Waste Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pyrolysis Valorization of Vegetable Wastes: Thermal, Kinetic, Thermodynamics, and Pyrogas Analyses

Open access

Abstract

In comparison to other methods, valorising food waste through pyrolysis appears to be the most promising because it is environmentally friendly, fast, and has a low infrastructure footprint. On the other hand, understanding the pyrolytic kinetic behaviour of feedstocks is critical to the design of pyrolysers. As a result, the pyrolytic degradation of some common kitchen vegetable waste, such as tomato, cucumber, carrot, and their blend, has been investigated in this study using a thermogravimetric analyser. The most prevalent model fitting method, Coats–Redfern, was used for the kinetic analysis, and the various mechanisms have been investigated. Some high-quality fitting mechanisms were identified and used to estimate the thermodynamic properties. As the generation of pyrolysis gases for chemical/energy production is important to the overall process applicability, TGA-coupled mass spectrometry was used to analyse the pyrogas for individual and blend samples. By comparing the devolatilization properties of the blend with single feedstocks, the presence of chemical interactions/synergistic effects between the vegetable samples in the blend was validated. The model, based on a first-order reaction mechanism, was found to be the best-fitting model for predicting the pyrolysis kinetics. The calculated thermodynamic properties (ΔH (enthalpy change ≈ E (activation energy))) demonstrated that pyrolysis of the chosen feedstocks is technically feasible. According to the TGA–MS analysis, blending had a considerable impact on the pyrogas, resulting in CO2 composition reductions of 17.10%, 9.11%, and 16.79%, respectively, in the cases of tomato, cucumber, and carrot. Overall, this study demonstrates the viability of the pyrolysis of kitchen vegetable waste as a waste management alternative, as well as an effective and sustainable source of pyrogas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en15176277

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pyrolysis can transform biomass into syngas and biochar and waste plastics into low-molecular-weight hydrocarbon fractions resembling kerosene, gasoline, and diesel fuels.

    “Pyrolysis, a thermochemical conversion process, demonstrates versatility by enabling the transformation of both biomass into products like syngas and biochar and also waste plastics into valuable low-molecular-weight hydrocarbon fractions resembling kerosene, gasoline, and diesel fuels [76][77][78][79][80].”

    From Biofuels, E-Fuels, and Waste-Derived Fuels: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [76]

    The “Biomass waste” section describes pyrolysis producing char and gases and discusses a syngas mixture; Section 3.2 reports biochar yields from vegetable wastes. The paper does not support the separate claim that waste plastics yield low-molecular-weight fractions resembling kerosene, gasoline, and diesel; its References list a study involving polyethylene, but provide no such finding. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reddy, 2018, Extraction and Characterization of Cellulose Microfibers from Agricultural Wastes of Onion and Garlic Extraction and Characterization of Cellulose Microfibers from, J. Nat. Fibers, 129, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Elkhalifa, S., Mariyam, S., Mackey, H. R., Al-Ansari, T., McKay, G., & Parthasarathy, P.
Affiliations
  • Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
  • Division of Sustainable Development, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha P.O. Box 5825, Qatar
Corresponding author
Parthasarathy, Prakash
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-08-28
Volume
15
Issue
17
Pages
6277
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293531009
Cited by
30
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) (NPRP11S-0117-180328)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
pyrolysis, tomato, cucumber, carrot, pyrolysis kinetics, Coats-Redfern method, activation energy, pyrolysis thermodynamics, devolatilization, feedstock blending, synergistic effect, waste valorization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review