The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of the Applicability of Synthetic Fuels and Their Life Cycle Analyses
Open accessAbstract
This paper summarizes the findings of a detailed assessment of synthetic, electricity-based fuels for use in aviation, shipping, and road transport. The fuels considered correspond to the most promising alternatives that were analyzed as part of the German research project BEniVer (Begleitforschung Energiewende im Verkehr—Accompanying Research for the Energy Transition in Transport) initiated by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK). Focusing on usage, infrastructure, and ecological analyses, several e-fuels were evaluated and compared to fossil fuels according to the specific sector. It turns out that for all sectors evaluated, the existing sustainable synthetic fuels are already compatible with current technology and regulations. In shipping and road transport, the use of advanced, sustainable fuels will allow for a more distinct reduction in emissions once technology and regulations are adopted. However, standard-compliant synthetic gasoline and diesel are considered the most promising fuels for use in road transport if the transition to electricity is not realized as quickly as planned. For the aviation sector, the number of sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) is limited. Here, the current aim is the introduction of a 100% SAF as soon as possible to also tackle non-CO2 emissions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018
Lee, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Skowron, A., Allen, M. R., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q., Doherty, S. J., Freeman, S., Forster, P. M., Fuglestvedt, J., et al. (2021) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834 · Cited by 1,957
Cleaner burning aviation fuels can reduce contrail cloudiness
Voigt, C., Kleine, J., Sauer, D., Moore, R. H., Bräuer, T., Le Clercq, P., Kaufmann, S., Scheibe, M., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Aigner, M., et al. (2021) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00174-y · Cited by 295
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Riedel, 2017, About the Emissions of Alternative Jet Fuels, CEAS Aeronaut. J., 8, 167, 10.1007/s13272-016-0230-3 · DOI
- Riebel, 2017, A Study on the Emissions of Alternative Aviation Fuels, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 139, 081503, 10.1115/1.4035816 · DOI
- Balkanski, 2010, Direct radiative effect of aerosols emitted by transport: From road, shipping and aviation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4477, 10.5194/acp-10-4477-2010 · DOI
- Uherek, 2010, Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Land transport, Atmos. Environ., 44, 4772, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.002 · DOI
- Bellouin, 2011, Aerosol forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the role of ammonium nitrate, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 116, D20206, 10.1029/2011JD016074 · DOI
- Righi, 2013, The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol: Simulations for year 2000 emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9939, 10.5194/acp-13-9939-2013 · DOI · Paper page
- Grewe, V., Dahlmann, K., Flink, J., Frömming, C., Ghosh, R., Gierens, K., Heller, R., Hendricks, J., Jöckel, P., and Kaufmann, S. (2017). Mitigating the Climate Impact from Aviation: Achievements and Results of the DLR WeCare Project. Aerospace, 4. · DOI
- Righi, 2023, The global impact of the transport sectors on the atmospheric aerosol and the resulting climate effects under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 835, 10.5194/esd-14-835-2023 · DOI
- Richter, S., Planke, K., Österle, I., Braun-Unkhoff, M., Prause, J., and Aigner, M. (2021, January 15–16). E-fuels for the Energy Transition in the Transport Sector—Properties and Application: Current State of Research. Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium Fuels—Conventional and Future Energy for Automobiles, Conference Proceedings 2021, Esslingen, Germany. Available online: https://elib.dlr.de/147325/.
- Schemme, 2017, Power-to-fuel as a key to sustainable transport systems—An analysis of diesel fuels produced from CO2 and renewable electricity, Fuel, 205, 198, 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.061 · DOI
- Sarathy, 2014, Alcohol Combustion Chemistry, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 44, 40, 10.1016/j.pecs.2014.04.003 · DOI
- Heimann, N., Dietrich, R.-U., Raab, M., Wulff, N., and Moser Rossel, F.T. (2023, January 22–24). Standardized techno-economic analysis for the production of e-fuels in Germany. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference Fuel Science: From Production to Propulsion 2023, Aachen, Germany. Available online: https://elib.dlr.de/195239/.
- Riedel, 2015, Alternative fuels in aviation, CEAS Aeronaut. J., 6, 83, 10.1007/s13272-014-0131-2 · DOI
- Blakey, 2011, Aviation gas turbine alternative fuels: A review, Proc. Combust. Inst., 33, 2863, 10.1016/j.proci.2010.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
- Pregger, T., Schiller, G., Cebulla, F., Dietrich, R.-U., Maier, S., Thess, A., Lischke, A., Monnerie, N., Sattler, C., and Le Clercq, P. (2020). Future Fuels—Analyses of the Future Prospects of Renewable Synthetic Fuels. Energies, 13. · DOI
- Richter, S., Kathrotia, T., Braun-Unkhoff, M., Naumann, C., and Köhler, M. (2021). Influence of Oxymethylene Ethers (OMEn) in Mixtures with a Diesel Surrogate. Energies, 14. · DOI
- Garbe, T. MtG—Efficiently Reducing fossil CO2-Emissions of Vehicle Fleet. C3-Mobility Final conference. Personal communication.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Richter, S., Braun-Unkhoff, M., Hasselwander, S., & Haas, S.
- Affiliations
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Combustion Technology, Pfaffenwaldring 38-40, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
- Research Center for Energy Economics (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Richter, Sandra
- Venue
- Energies
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-02-20
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 981
- ISSN
- 1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391996534
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (03EiV116A-G)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
- Keywords
- synthetic fuels, e-fuels, sustainable aviation fuel, life cycle assessment, synthetic gasoline, synthetic diesel, road transport, aviation emissions, non-CO2 emissions, fuel infrastructure, fossil fuel comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
