The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What is the Minimum EROI that a Sustainable Society Must Have?
Open accessAbstract
Economic production and, more generally, most global societies, are overwhelmingly dependant upon depleting supplies of fossil fuels. There is considerable concern amongst resource scientists, if not most economists, as to whether market signals or cost benefit analysis based on today’s prices are sufficient to guide our decisions about our energy future. These suspicions and concerns were escalated during the oil price increase from 2005 – 2008 and the subsequent but probably related market collapse of 2008. We believe that Energy Return On Investment (EROI) analysis provides a useful approach for examining disadvantages and advantages of different fuels and also offers the possibility to look into the future in ways that markets seem unable to do. The goal of this paper is to review the application of EROI theory to both natural and economic realms, and to assess preliminarily the minimum EROI that a society must attain from its energy exploitation to support continued economic activity and social function. In doing so we calculate herein a basic first attempt at the minimum EROI for current society and some of the consequences when that minimum is approached. The theory of the minimum EROI discussed here, which describes the somewhat obvious but nonetheless important idea that for any being or system to survive or grow it must gain substantially more energy than it uses in obtaining that energy, may be especially important. Thus any particular being or system must abide by a “Law of Minimum EROI”, which we calculate for both oil and corn-based ethanol as about 3:1 at the mine-mouth/farm-gate. Since most biofuels have EROI’s of less than 3:1 they must be subsidized by fossil fuels to be useful.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change
Mac Dowell, N., Fennell, P. S., Shah, N., & Maitland, G. C. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3231 · Cited by 1,321
Direct air capture: process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges
Erans, M., Sanz-Pérez, E. S., Hanak, D. P., Clulow, Z., Reiner, D. M., & Mutch, G. A. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee03523a · Cited by 688
Year in review-EROI or energy return on (energy) invested
Murphy, D. J., & Hall, C. A. S. (2010) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05282.x · Cited by 491
Self-citationPost-growth: the science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries
Kallis, G., Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Jackson, T., Victor, P. A., Raworth, K., Schor, J. B., Steinberger, J. K., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2025) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00310-3 · Cited by 261
Tao, L., Tan, E. C. D., McCormick, R., Zhang, M., Aden, A., He, X., & Zigler, B. T. (2014) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1431 · Cited by 241
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, C. A. S., Balogh, S., & Murphy, D. J. R.
- Venue
- Energies
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2009-01-23
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-47
- ISSN
- 1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132299435
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is the Minimum EROI that a Sustainable Society Must Have? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/en20100025
- The paper
- Hall, C. A. S., Balogh, S., & Murphy, D. J. R. (2009). What is the Minimum EROI that a Sustainable Society Must Have? Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en20100025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.