The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Small Drones for Community-Based Forest Monitoring: An Assessment of Their Feasibility and Potential in Tropical Areas
Open accessAbstract
Data gathered through community-based forest monitoring (CBFM) programs may be as accurate as those gathered by professional scientists, but acquired at a much lower cost and capable of providing more detailed data about the occurrence, extent and drivers of forest loss, degradation and regrowth at the community scale. In addition, CBFM enables greater survey repeatability. Therefore, CBFM should be a fundamental component of national forest monitoring systems and programs to measure, report and verify (MRV) REDD+ activities. To contribute to the development of more effective approaches to CBFM, in this paper we assess: (1) the feasibility of using small, low-cost drones (i.e., remotely piloted aerial vehicles) in CBFM programs; (2) their potential advantages and disadvantages for communities, partner organizations and forest data end-users; and (3) to what extent their utilization, coupled with ground surveys and local ecological knowledge, would improve tropical forest monitoring. To do so, we reviewed the existing literature regarding environmental applications of drones, including forest monitoring, and drew on our own firsthand experience flying small drones to map and monitor tropical forests and training people to operate them. We believe that the utilization of small drones can enhance CBFM and that this approach is feasible in many locations throughout the tropics if some degree of external assistance and funding is provided to communities. We suggest that the use of small drones can help tropical communities to better manage and conserve their forests whilst benefiting partner organizations, governments and forest data end-users, particularly those engaged in forestry, biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation projects such as REDD+.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review
Zhang, C., & Kovacs, J. M. (2012) · Precision Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s11119-012-9274-5 · Cited by 2,012
CO2 emissions from forest loss
van der Werf, G. R., Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Olivier, J. G. J., Kasibhatla, P. S., Jackson, R. B., Collatz, G. J., & Randerson, J. T. (2009) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo671 · Cited by 1,404
Managing Forests for Climate Change Mitigation
Canadell, J. G., & Raupach, M. R. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155458 · Cited by 1,393
Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: An Overview
Sunderlin, W. D., Angelsen, A., Belcher, B., Burgers, P., Nasi, R., Santoso, L., & Wunder, S. (2005) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004 · Cited by 1,014
Watts, A. C., Ambrosia, V. G., & Hinkley, E. A. (2012) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs4061671 · Cited by 927
LINGUISTIC, CULTURAL, AND BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Maffi, L. (2005) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120437 · Cited by 847
Porter-Bolland, L., Ellis, E. A., Guariguata, M. R., Ruiz-Mallén, I., Negrete-Yankelevich, S., & Reyes-García, V. (2012) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.034 · Cited by 755
Dawn of Drone Ecology: Low-Cost Autonomous Aerial Vehicles for Conservation
Koh, L. P., & Wich, S. A. (2012) · Tropical Conservation Science · doi:10.1177/194008291200500202 · Cited by 732
Self-citationDevelopment of a UAV-LiDAR System with Application to Forest Inventory
Wallace, L., Lucieer, A., Watson, C., & Turner, D. (2012) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs4061519 · Cited by 710
Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons
Chhatre, A., & Agrawal, A. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0905308106 · Cited by 679
Cited by
UAV lidar and hyperspectral fusion for forest monitoring in the southwestern USA
Sankey, T., Donager, J., McVay, J., & Sankey, J. B. (2017) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.04.007 · Cited by 447
Linking plant phenology to conservation biology
Morellato, L. P. C., Alberton, B., Alvarado, S. T., Borges, B., Buisson, E., Camargo, M. G. G., Cancian, L. F., Carstensen, D. W., Escobar, D. F. E., Leite, P. T. P., et al. (2016) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.033 · Cited by 423
Drones for Conservation in Protected Areas: Present and Future
Jiménez López, J., & Mulero-Pázmány, M. (2019) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones3010010 · Cited by 300
Wildlife research and management methods in the 21st century: Where do unmanned aircraft fit in?
Chabot, D., & Bird, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems · doi:10.1139/juvs-2015-0021 · Cited by 286
Networked Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Surveillance and Monitoring: A Survey
Li, X., & Savkin, A. V. (2021) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13070174 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Paneque-Gálvez, J., McCall, M., Napoletano, B., Wich, S., & Koh, L.
- Venue
- Forests
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2014-06-24
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1481-1507
- ISSN
- 1999-4907 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023703534
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 16.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Small Drones for Community-Based Forest Monitoring: An Assessment of Their Feasibility and Potential in Tropical Areas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/f5061481
- The paper
- Paneque-Gálvez, J., McCall, M., Napoletano, B., Wich, S., & Koh, L. (2014). Small Drones for Community-Based Forest Monitoring: An Assessment of Their Feasibility and Potential in Tropical Areas. Forests. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5061481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.