Cited by 102Fermentation and Sensory AnalysisHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Effect of Sequential Inoculation with Non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces Yeasts on Riesling Wine Chemical Composition

Open access
Dutraive, Ophélie, Benito, Santiago, Fritsch, Stefanie, Beisert, Beata, Patz, Claus-Dieter, Rauhut, Doris·2019·Fermentation

Abstract

In recent years, studies have reported the positive influence of non-Saccharomyces yeast on wine quality. Many grape varieties under mixed or sequential inoculation show an overall positive effect on aroma enhancement. A potential impact by non-Saccharomyces yeast on volatile and non-volatile compounds should benefit the flavor of Riesling wines. Following this trend, four separate sequential fermentations (using the non-Saccharomyces yeasts Torulaspora delbrueckii, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Pichia kluyveri, and Lachancea thermotolerans with Saccharomyces cerevisiae) were carried out on Riesling must and compared to a pure culture of S. cerevisiae. Sequential fermentations influenced the final wine aroma. Significant differences were found in esters, acetates, higher alcohols, fatty acids, and low volatile sulfur compounds between the different trials. Other parameters, including the production of non-volatile compounds, showed significant differences. This fermentation process not only allows the modulation of wine aroma but also chemical parameters such as glycerol, ethanol, alcohol, acidity, or fermentation by-products. These potential benefits of wine diversity should be beneficial to the wine industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/fermentation5030079

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dutraive, O., Benito, S., Fritsch, S., Beisert, B., Patz, C.-D., & Rauhut, D.
Affiliations
  • Hochschule Geisenheim University (DE)
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Benito, Santiago
Venue
Fermentation
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-09-01
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
79
ISSN
2311-5637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970195072
Cited by
102
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fermentation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial (FPA1720300120)
  • Erasmus+
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Horticultural and Viticultural Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
sequential inoculation, non-Saccharomyces yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, wine aroma, volatile compounds, esters, higher alcohols, fatty acids, volatile sulfur compounds, Torulaspora delbrueckii, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Pichia kluyveri, Lachancea thermotolerans, mixed culture fermentation, wine composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review