The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Communication Protocols of an Industrial Internet of Things Environment: A Comparative Study
Open accessAbstract
Most industrial and SCADA-like (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems use proprietary communication protocols, and hence interoperability is not fulfilled. However, the MODBUS TCP is an open de facto standard, and is used for some automation and telecontrol systems. It is based on a polling mechanism and follows the synchronous request–response pattern, as opposed to the asynchronous publish–subscribe pattern. In this study, polling-based and event-based protocols are investigated to realize an open and interoperable Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) environment. Many Internet of Things (IoT) protocols are introduced and compared, and the message queuing telemetry transport (MQTT) is chosen as the event-based, publish–subscribe protocol. The study shows that MODBUS defines an optimized message structure in the application layer, which is dedicated to industrial applications. In addition, it shows that an event-oriented IoT protocol complements the MODBUS TCP but cannot replace it. Therefore, two scenarios are proposed to build the IIoT environment. The first scenario is to consider the MODBUS TCP as an IoT protocol, and build the environment using the MODBUS TCP on a standalone basis. The second scenario is to use MQTT in conjunction with the MODBUS TCP. The first scenario is efficient and complies with most industrial applications where the request–response pattern is needed only. If the publish–subscribe pattern is needed, the MQTT in the second scenario complements the MODBUS TCP and eliminates the need for a gateway; however, MQTT lacks interoperability. To maintain a homogeneous message structure for the entire environment, industrial data are organized using the structure of MODBUS messages, formatted in the UTF-8, and then transferred in the payload of an MQTT publish message. The open and interoperable environment can be used for Internet SCADA, Internet-based monitoring, and industrial control systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“There are numerous benefits in process optimization, cost reduction, enhancing product and control quality [19], [20], and overall functionality from IIoT implementation in the I4.0 manufacturing plants leveraging multiple information sources of interconnected devices and their computational capabilities.”
From SCADA Systems With Focus on Continuous Manufacturing and Steel Industry: A Survey on Architectures, Standards, Challenges and Industry 5.0 (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet of Things for Smart Cities
Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A. P., Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2014) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2014.2306328 · Cited by 6,385
Müller, J. M., Kiel, D., & Voigt, K. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10010247 · Cited by 1,118
An intrusion detection system for connected vehicles in smart cities
Aloqaily, M., Otoum, S., Ridhawi, I. A., & Jararweh, Y. (2019) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.02.001 · Cited by 394
Internet of Things for Smart Cities: Interoperability and Open Data
Ahlgren, B., Hidell, M., & Ngai, E. C.-H. (2016) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2016.124 · Cited by 342
A Reconfigurable Smart Sensor Interface for Industrial WSN in IoT Environment
Chi, Q., Yan, H., Zhang, C., Pang, Z., & Xu, L. D. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2306798 · Cited by 316
Requirements of the Smart Factory System: A Survey and Perspective
Mabkhot, M. M., Al-Ahmari, A. M., Salah, B., & Alkhalefah, H. (2018) · Machines · doi:10.3390/machines6020023 · Cited by 293
Big Data Analytics for Smart Manufacturing: Case Studies in Semiconductor Manufacturing
Moyne, J. R., & Iskandar, J. (2017) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr5030039 · Cited by 259
Edge Computing Framework for Cooperative Video Processing in Multimedia IoT Systems
Long, C., Cao, Y., Jiang, T., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2017.2764330 · Cited by 222
Tao, F., Cheng, J., & Qi, Q. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2017.2759178 · Cited by 220
Industrial IoT Data Scheduling Based on Hierarchical Fog Computing: A Key for Enabling Smart Factory
Chekired, D. A., Khoukhi, L., & Mouftah, H. T. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2843802 · Cited by 206
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Standard IEEE 802.11 (2012). Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY), IEEE.
- Standard IEEE 754 (2008). Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic, IEEE.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Federated-Learning-Based Anomaly Detection for IoT Security Attacks
Mothukuri, V., Khare, P., Parizi, R. M., Pouriyeh, S., Dehghantanha, A., & Srivastava, G. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3077803 · Cited by 787
Digital Twin: A Comprehensive Survey of Security Threats
Alcaraz, C., & López, J. (2022) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2022.3171465 · Cited by 364
A Comprehensive Survey on Interoperability for IIoT: Taxonomy, Standards, and Future Directions
Hazra, A., Adhikari, M., Amgoth, T., & Srirama, S. N. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3485130 · Cited by 241
URLLC and eMBB in 5G Industrial IoT: A Survey
Khan, B. S., Jangsher, S., Ahmed, A., & Al‐Dweik, A. (2022) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2022.3189013 · Cited by 222
Qian, C., Liu, X., Ripley, C., Qian, M., Liang, F., & Yu, W. (2022) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi14020064 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaloudi, S.
- Affiliations
- Al-Quds Open University (PS)
- Corresponding author
- Jaloudi, Samer
- ORCID
- Jaloudi, Samer
- Venue
- Future Internet
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-03-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 66
- ISSN
- 1999-5903 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2919320025
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Future Internet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Keywords
- Industrial Internet of Things, Modbus TCP, MQTT, publish/subscribe protocol, request-response communication, interoperability, SCADA, message queuing, UTF-8
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
