Cited by 222IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AIVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods

Edge Computing Framework for Cooperative Video Processing in Multimedia IoT Systems

Long, Changchun, Cao, Yang, Jiang, Tao, Zhang, Qian·2018·IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

Abstract

Multimedia Internet-of-Things (IoT) systems have been widely used in surveillance, automatic behavior analysis and event recognition, which integrate image processing, computer vision, and networking capabilities. In conventional multimedia IoT systems, videos captured by surveillance cameras are required to be delivered to remote IoT servers for video analysis. However, the long-distance transmission of a large volume of video chunks may cause congestions and delays due to limited network bandwidth. Nowadays, mobile devices, e.g., smart phones and tablets, are resource-abundant in computation and communication capabilities. Thus, these devices have the potential to extract features from videos for the remote IoT servers. By sending back only a few video features to the remote servers, the bandwidth starvation of delivering original video chunks can be avoided. In this paper, we propose an edge computing framework to enable cooperative processing on resource-abundant mobile devices for delay-sensitive multimedia IoT tasks. We identify that the key challenges in the proposed edge computing framework are to optimally form mobile devices into video processing groups and to dispatch video chunks to proper video processing groups. Based on the derived optimal matching theorem, we put forward a cooperative video processing scheme formed by two efficient algorithms to tackle above challenges, which achieves suboptimal performance on the human detection accuracy. The proposed scheme has been evaluated under diverse parameter settings. Extensive simulation confirms the superiority of the proposed scheme over other two baseline schemes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmm.2017.2764330

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Long, C., Cao, Y., Jiang, T., & Zhang, Q.
Affiliations
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
Published
2018-05
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
1126-1139
ISSN
  • 1520-9210 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0077
OpenAlex
W2766827306
Cited by
222
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 1
FWCI
18.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61601193, 61729101, 61631015, 61720106001)
  • Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of Hubei in China (2016CFA009)
  • Independent Innovation Research Fund of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2016YXMS305)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Keywords
edge computing, mobile devices, optimal matching, human detection, surveillance video analysis, delay-sensitive tasks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review