Cited by 47Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption

An Image Authentication Scheme Using Merkle Tree Mechanisms

Open access
Chen, Yi-Cheng, Chou, Yueh-Peng, Chou, Yung-Chen·2019·Future Internet

Abstract

Research on digital image processing has become quite popular and rapid in recent years, and scholars have proposed various image verification mechanisms. Similarly , blockchain technology has also become very popular in recent years. This paper proposes a new image verification mechanism based on the Merkle tree technique in the blockchain. The Merkle tree root in the blockchain mechanism provides a reliable environment for storage of image features. In image verification, the verification of each image can be performed by the Merkle tree mechanism to obtain the hash value of the Merkle tree node on the path. In addition, the method combines the Inter-Planetary File System (IPFS) to improve the availability of images. The main purpose of this paper is to achieve the goal of image integrity verification. The proposed method can not only verify the integrity of the image but also restore the tampered area in the case of image tampering. Since the proposed method employs the blockchain mechanism, the image verification mechanism does not need third party resources . The verification method is performed by each node in the blockchain network. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method successfully achieved the goal of image authentication and tampered area restoration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/fi11070149

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When detecting the originality of an image, traversing the data of each block in the original Merkle tree of the blockchain and retrieving the approximate image through image multidimensional data is inefficient and does not support multidimensional data querying.

    “When detecting the originality of an image, the system traverses the data of each block in the original Merkle tree of the blockchain and retrieves the approximate image through the image multidimensional data to determine its originality, which is an inefficient way of querying and does not support the multidimensional data querying [10].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y.-C., Chou, Y.-P., & Chou, Y.-C.
Affiliations
Asia University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chou, Yung-Chen
Venue
Future Internet
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-07-06
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
149
ISSN
1999-5903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953790105
Cited by
47
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Future Internet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Keywords
image authentication, Merkle trees, blockchain, image integrity verification, IPFS, image forgery detection, imaging features, distributed verification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review