Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Corn and Rice Starch-Based Bio-Plastics as Alternative Packaging Materials

Open access
Marichelvam, M. K., Jawaid, Mohammad, Asim, Mohammad·2019·Fibers

Abstract

Due to the negative environmental impacts of synthetic plastics, the development of biodegradable plastics for both industrial and commercial applications is essential today. Researchers have developed various starch-based composites for different applications. The present work investigates the corn and rice starch-based bioplastics for packaging applications. Various samples of bioplastics are produced, with different compositions of corn and rice starch, glycerol, citric acid, and gelatin. The tensile properties were improved after adding rice starch. However, water absorption and water solubility were reduced. On the basis of these results, the best sample was analyzed for thickness testing, biodegradability properties, SEM, hydrophilicity, thermogravimetric analysis, and sealing properties of bioplastic. The results show the suitability of rice and corn-based thermoplastic starch for packaging applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/fib7040032

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Muscat, 2012, Comparative study of film forming behaviour of low and high amylose starches using glycerol and xylitol as plasticizers, J. Food Eng., 109, 189, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.10.019 · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.10.019
  2. Abidin, 2015, Fabrication and properties of chitosan with starch for packaging application, Malays. J. Anal. Sci., 19, 1032
  3. Edhirej, 2017, Effect of various plasticizers and concentration on the physical, thermal, mechanical, and structural properties of cassava-starch-based films, Starch-Stärke, 69, 1500366, 10.1002/star.201500366 · doi:10.1002/star.201500366
  4. Edhirej, 2017, Preparation and characterization of cassava bagasse reinforced thermoplastic cassava starch, Fibers Polym., 18, 162, 10.1007/s12221-017-6251-7 · doi:10.1007/s12221-017-6251-7
  5. Edhirej, 2017, Tensile, Barrier, Dynamic Mechanical, and Biodegradation Properties of Cassava/Sugar Palm Fiber Reinforced Cassava Starch Hybrid Composites, BioResources, 12, 7145, 10.15376/biores.12.4.7145-7160 · doi:10.15376/biores.12.4.7145-7160
  6. Edhirej, 2018, Preparation and Characterization of Cassava Starch/Peel Composite Film, Polym. Compos., 39, 1704, 10.1002/pc.24121 · doi:10.1002/pc.24121
  7. Sanyang, 2016, Effect of sugar palm-derived cellulose reinforcement on the mechanical and water barrier properties of sugar palm starch biocomposite films, BioResources, 11, 4134, 10.15376/biores.11.2.4134-4145 · doi:10.15376/biores.11.2.4134-4145
  8. Sanyang, 2017, Tea Tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) Fiber as Novel Reinforcement Material for Sugar Palm Biopolymer Based Composite Films, BioResources, 12, 3751, 10.15376/biores.12.2.3751-3765 · doi:10.15376/biores.12.2.3751-3765
  9. Young, A.H. (1984). Fractionation of starch. Starch: Chemistry and Technology (Second Edition), Elsevier. · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-746270-7.50014-8
  10. Borges, 2015, Influence of different starch sources and plasticizers on properties of biodegradable films, Int. Food Res. J., 22, 2346
  11. Podshivalov, 2017, Gelatin/potato starch edible biocomposite films: Correlation between morphology and physical properties, Carbohydr. Polym., 157, 1162, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.079 · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.079
  12. Kulshreshtha, 2017, Corncrete: A corn starch based building material, Constr. Build. Mater., 154, 411, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.184 · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.184
  13. Luchese, 2018, Development and characterization of cassava starch films incorporated with blueberry pomace, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 106, 834, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.083 · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.083
  14. Zhang, R., Wang, X., and Cheng, M. (2018). Preparation and Characterization of Potato Starch Film with Various Size of Nano-SiO2. Polymers, 10. · doi:10.3390/polym10101172
  15. Larotonda, 2004, Biodegradable films made from raw and acetylated cassava starch, Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 47, 477, 10.1590/S1516-89132004000300019 · doi:10.1590/s1516-89132004000300019
  16. Woggum, 2014, Properties and characteristics of dual-modified rice starch based biodegradable films, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 67, 490, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.029 · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.029
  17. Fakhouri, 2007, Films and edible coatings based on native starches and gelatin in the conservation and sensory acceptance of Crimson gra, Food Sci. Technol., 27, 369, 10.1590/S0101-20612007000200027 · doi:10.1590/s0101-20612007000200027
  18. Martelli, 2012, Chicken feather keratin films plasticized with polyethylene glycol, Int. J. Polym. Mater., 61, 17, 10.1080/00914037.2011.557809 · doi:10.1080/00914037.2011.557809

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
Marichelvam, M. K., Jawaid, M., & Asim, M.
Venue
Fibers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-04-09
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
32
ISSN
2079-6439 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2938364377
Cited by
423
References
33
FWCI
10.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corn and Rice Starch-Based Bio-Plastics as Alternative Packaging Materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/fib7040032
The paper
Marichelvam, M. K., Jawaid, M., & Asim, M. (2019). Corn and Rice Starch-Based Bio-Plastics as Alternative Packaging Materials. Fibers. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib7040032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.