Cited by 12Celiac Disease Research and ManagementFood Safety and HygieneIdentification and Quantification in Food

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of Gluten Content in Gluten-Free Pizza from Certified Take-Away Pizza Restaurants

Open access

Abstract

Currently, a strict gluten-free diet is the only treatment for celiac disease. In Italy, food service establishments and restaurants can be certified for providing gluten-free foods, including pizza restaurants that make both gluten-free pizza and traditional wheat-based pizza. With this study we analyzed the gluten content in samples of gluten-free pizza prepared and purchased at certified restaurants in the Turin metropolitan area. All samples, from 28 pizzas and 28 cooked dough bases, produced results below the test limit of detection, except for one sample of cooked dough, that tested positive for gluten but still below the warning level for celiac consumers (<20 ppm). Gluten-free pizza, as advertised in the restaurants surveyed, can be considered a safe option for gluten-free consumption. Attention to and compliance with good manufacturing practices, a requisite for obtaining gluten-free certification for restaurants, were noted to have a positive effect on the final product.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/foods7110180

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Gujral, 2012, Celiac disease: Prevalence, diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment, World J. Gastroenterol., 18, 6036, 10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6036 · DOI
  2. Freeman, 2017, Dietary compliance in celiac disease, World J. Gastroenterol., 23, 2635, 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2635 · DOI
  3. Leonard, 2017, Celiac Disease and Nonceliac Gluten Sensitivity: A Review, JAMA, 318, 647, 10.1001/jama.2017.9730 · DOI
  4. Lahr, 2008, Predictors of family risk for celiac disease: A population-based study, Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 6, 983, 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.04.008 · DOI
  5. European, 2011, Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, Off. J. Eur. Union, L304, 18
  6. European, 2014, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 828/2014 of 30 July 2014 on the requirements for the provision of information to consumers on the absence or reduced presence of gluten in food, Off. J. Eur Union, L228, 5
  7. Aziz, 2014, Change in awareness of gluten-related disorders among chefs and the general public in the UK: A 10-year follow-up study, Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 26, 1228, 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000166 · DOI
  8. Lee, 2012, Living with coeliac disease: Survey results from the USA, J. Hum. Nutr. Diet., 25, 233, 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2012.01236.x · DOI
  9. Rahim, 2010, Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet, Am. J. Gastroenterol., 105, 1412, 10.1038/ajg.2010.10 · DOI
  10. Vespa, 2017, Celiac disease: Understanding the gluten-free diet, Eur. J. Nutr., 56, 449, 10.1007/s00394-016-1238-5 · DOI
  11. McKinnon, 2008, Gluten contamination of cereal foods in Canada, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 43, 1245, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2007.01599.x · DOI
  12. Lee, 2014, Gluten contamination in foods labeled as “gluten free” in the United States, J. Food Prot., 77, 1830, 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-149 · DOI
  13. Hassan, 2017, Evaluation of gluten in gluten-free-labeled foods and assessment of exposure level to gluten among celiac patients in Lebanon, Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr., 68, 881, 10.1080/09637486.2017.1303461 · DOI
  14. Gibert, 2013, Might gluten traces in wheat substitutes pose a risk in patients with celiac disease? A population-based probabilistic approach to risk estimation, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 97, 109, 10.3945/ajcn.112.047985 · DOI
  15. Verma, A.K., Gatti, S., Galeazzi, T., Monachesi, C., Padella, L., Baldo, G.D., Annibali, R., Lionetti, E., and Catassi, C. (2017). Gluten Contamination in Naturally or Labeled Gluten-Free Products Marketed in Italy. Nutrients, 9. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bustamante, M.Á., Fernández-Gil, M.P., Churruca, I., Miranda, J., Lasa, A., Navarro, V., and Simón, E. (2017). Evolution of Gluten Content in Cereal-Based Gluten-Free Products: An Overview from 1998 to 2016. Nutrients, 9. · DOI
  17. Farage, 2017, Gluten contamination in gluten-free bakery products: A risk for coeliac disease patients, Public Health Nutr., 20, 413, 10.1017/S1368980016002433 · DOI
  18. Oliveira, 2014, Evaluation of the Presence of Gluten in Beans Served at self-Service Restaurants: A Problem for Celiac Disease Carriers, J. Culin. Sci. Technol., 12, 22, 10.1080/15428052.2013.798606 · DOI
  19. Halmos, 2018, Gluten in “gluten-free” food from food outlets in Melbourne: A cross-sectional study, Med. J. Aust., 209, 42, 10.5694/mja17.00883 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Karajeh, 2005, Chefs’ knowledge of coeliac disease (compared to the public): A questionnaire survey from the United Kingdom, Clin. Nutr., 24, 206, 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.08.006 · DOI
  21. Simpson, 2011, Awareness of gluten-related disorders: A survey of the general public, chefs and patients, e-SPEN, the European e-J. Clin. Nutr. Metab., 6, e227, 10.1016/j.eclnm.2011.08.001 · DOI
  22. Schultz, 2017, Awareness of coeliac disease among chefs and cooks depends on the level and place of training, Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr., 26, 719

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bianchi, D. M., Maurella, C., Gallina, S., Gorrasi, I. S. R., Caramelli, M., & Decastelli, L.
Affiliations
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d'Aosta (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Gorrasi, Ilaria Silvia Rossella
Venue
Foods
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-10-31
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
180
ISSN
2304-8158 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898703788
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Foods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
Keywords
gluten content, celiac disease, restaurant food safety, good manufacturing practices, gluten-free diet, pizza dough

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review