The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
pH Responsive Hydrogels for the Delivery of Capecitabine: Development, Optimization and Pharmacokinetic Studies
Open accessAbstract
The objective of the current study was to achieve a sustained release profile of capecitabine (CAP), an anticancer agent frequently administered in conventional dosage form due to its short plasma half-life. A drug-loaded smart pH responsive chitosan/fenugreek-g-poly (MAA) hydrogel was synthesized by an aqueous free radical polymerization technique. The developed network was evaluated for capecitabine loading %, swelling response, morphology, structural and compositional characteristics, and drug release behavior. Significantly higher swelling and in vitro drug release rate were exhibited by formulations at pH 7.4 than at pH 1.2, demonstrating the pH responsive character of hydrogels. Swelling percentage and CAP loading ranged within 74.45–83.54% and 50.13–72.43%, respectively. Maximum release, up to 93%, was demonstrated over 30 h, evidencing the controlled release pattern of CAP from hydrogels. The optimized formulation was further screened for acute oral toxicity studies. No signs of oral, dermal, or ocular toxicities were noticed, confirming safety evidence of the network. Furthermore, pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated the sustained release response of CAP from hydrogels as confirmed by a significant increase in plasma half-life (t1/2) (13 h) and AUC (42.88 µg h/mL) of CAP. Based on these findings, fabricated hydrogels are strongly recommended as a biocompatible carrier for colorectal delivery of active agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cationic polymers like chitosan swell in pH media below pKb due to the protonation of cationic amine/imine group.
“Cationic polymers like chitosan swell in pH media below pKb due to the protonation of cationic amine/imine group (Ding et al., 2022; Rehman et al., 2022).”
From pH stimuli-responsive hydrogels from non-cellulosic biopolymers for drug delivery. (2023) · cites this paper as Rehman et al., 2022
The Introduction says chitosan is cationic and that protonation of its primary amine groups makes it soluble in dilute acid. Section 2.2 attributes expansion of the chitosan-containing hydrogel network to repulsion between ionized amino groups. The paper does not give a pKb threshold or attribute swelling below it to amine or imine protonation; its Conclusions instead report greater swelling of the tested hydrogels at alkaline than acidic pH. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredHydrogel formulations of chitosan and fenugreek-g-poly(MAA) showed a notable increase in swelling and in vitro drug release rate at pH 7.4 compared to pH 1.2, indicating pH-responsive nature.
“The hydrogel formulations shown a notable increase in swelling and in vitro drug release rate when subjected to a pH of 7.4 compared to a pH of 1.2, thereby indicating the pH-responsive nature of the hydrogels.”
From pH stimuli-responsive hydrogels from non-cellulosic biopolymers for drug delivery. (2023) · cites this paper as Rehman et al., 2022
Section 2.9 reports substantially greater in vitro capecitabine release at pH 7.4 than at pH 1.2. The Conclusions also state that swelling was greater at alkaline than acidic pH, but the swelling results in Section 2.2 report measurements at pH 7.4 without documenting a pH 1.2 comparison. Thus, the specific pH 7.4-versus-1.2 comparison is supported for drug release, but not established for swelling. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe swelling percentage and capecitabine loading of the hydrogels ranged from 74.45%-83.54% and 50.13%-72.43%, respectively.
“The swelling percentage and CAP loading exhibited a range of 74.45%–83.54% and 50.13%–72.43%, respectively.”
From pH stimuli-responsive hydrogels from non-cellulosic biopolymers for drug delivery. (2023) · cites this paper as Rehman et al., 2022
Section 2.1 (CAP Loading) reports the claimed loading range of 50.13–72.43%. Section 2.2 (Swelling Behavior) instead reports swelling values spanning 70.37–90.62% across the formulations, so the claimed swelling range of 74.45–83.54% is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere were no observed indications of oral, cutaneous, or ocular toxicities for the improved hydrogel formulation, confirming its safety profile.
“There were no observed indications of oral, cutaneous, or ocular toxicities, hence providing confirmation of the network’s safety profile.”
From pH stimuli-responsive hydrogels from non-cellulosic biopolymers for drug delivery. (2023) · cites this paper as Rehman et al., 2022
Pharmacokinetic research revealed sustained release of capecitabine from hydrogels, with elevated plasma half-life (13 h) and AUC (42.88 μg h/mL).
“In addition, the pharmacokinetic research revealed the sustained release properties of capecitabine from hydrogels, as evidenced by a notable elevation in the plasma half-life (t1/2) (13 h) and the area under the curve (AUC) (42.88 μg h/mL) of capecitabine.”
From pH stimuli-responsive hydrogels from non-cellulosic biopolymers for drug delivery. (2023) · cites this paper as Rehman et al., 2022
The hydrogels exhibited a regulated release pattern of capecitabine, with a maximum release of 93% within 30 h.
“The hydrogels exhibited a regulated release pattern of capecitabine, with a maximum release of 93% observed within a 30-h timeframe.”
From pH stimuli-responsive hydrogels from non-cellulosic biopolymers for drug delivery. (2023) · cites this paper as Rehman et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Malik, N. S., Ahmad, M., Minhas, M. U., Tulain, U. R., Barkat, K., Khalid, S. H., & Khalid, Q. (2020) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2020.00050 · Cited by 163
RetractedDesigning hydrogels for controlled drug delivery
Li, J., & Mooney, D. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71 · Cited by 5,028
Qu, J., Zhao, X., Ma, P. X., & Guo, B. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.018 · Cited by 468
Liang, Y., Zhao, X., Ma, P. X., Guo, B., Du, Y., & Han, X. (2018) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.056 · Cited by 444
Gomathi, A. C., Rajarathinam, S. R. X., Sadiq, A. M., & Rajeshkumar, S. (2019) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101376 · Cited by 396
Khan, S., & Ranjha, N. M. (2014) · Polymer Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s00289-014-1178-2 · Cited by 294
Sampath, U. G. T. M., Ching, Y. C., Chuah, C. H., Singh, R., & Lin, P.-C. (2017) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-017-1251-8 · Cited by 224
Wu, Q., He, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, Q., Wei, Q., Ma, S., Ma, C., Li, J., & Wang, Q. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08234-2 · Cited by 224
Advances in hydrogel delivery systems for tissue regeneration
Toh, W. S., & Loh, X. J. (2014) · Materials Science and Engineering C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2014.04.026 · Cited by 179
Afshar, M., Dini, G., Vaezifar, S., Mehdikhani, M., & Movahedi, B. (2020) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101530 · Cited by 139
Amphotericin B Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles for Treatment of Leishmania Infections
Saqib, M., Bhatti, A. S. A., Ahmad, N. M., Ahmed, N., Shahnaz, G., Lebaz, N., & Elaı̈ssari, A. (2020) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano10061152 · Cited by 107
Kelly, C., Bhuva, N. J., Harrison, M., Buckley, A., & Saunders, M. P. (2013) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.004 · Cited by 102
Ganguly, S., Maity, P. P., Mondal, S., Das, P., Bhawal, P., Dhara, S., & Das, N. C. (2018) · Materials Science and Engineering C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2018.06.034 · Cited by 97
Controlled release of tinidazole and theophylline from chitosan based composite hydrogels
Samanta, H. S., & Ray, S. K. (2014) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.097 · Cited by 94
Gong, C. Y., Shi, S., Dong, P. W., Yang, B., Qi, X., Guo, G. F., Gu, Y. C., Zhao, X., Wei, Y., & Qian, Z. Y. (2009) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.21780 · Cited by 93
Farhadnejad, H., Mortazavi, S. A., Erfan, M., Darbasizadeh, B., Motasadizadeh, H., & Fatahi, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.061 · Cited by 73
Deng, Y., Yang, X., Zhang, X., Cao, H., Mao, L., Yuan, M., & Liao, W. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.05.220 · Cited by 72
Sun, Y., Cui, F., Shi, K., Wang, J., Niu, M., & Ma, R. (2008) · Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy · doi:10.1080/03639040802395185 · Cited by 70
Microparticles produced by the hydrogel template method for sustained drug delivery
Lü, Y., Sturek, M. S., & Park, K. (2013) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.11.058 · Cited by 63
Swelling behavior and release properties of pH-sensitive hydrogels based on methacrylic derivatives
Bartil, T., Bounekhel, M., Calberg, C., & Jeerome, R. (2007) · Acta Pharmaceutica · doi:10.2478/v10007-007-0024-6 · Cited by 62
Pal, P., Singh, S. K., Mishra, S. K., Pandey, J. P., & Sen, G. (2019) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.114979 · Cited by 62
Che, Y., Li, D., Liu, Y., Ma, Q., Tan, Y., Yue, Q., & Meng, F. (2016) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c6ra16746b · Cited by 57
Chaves, L. L., Silveri, A., Vieira, A. C. C., Ferreira, D., Cristiano, M. C., Paolino, D., Marzio, L. D., Lima, S. A. C., Reis, S., Sarmento, B. F. C. C., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.178 · Cited by 55
Ijaz, H., Tulain, U. R., Azam, F., & Qureshi, J. (2019) · Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy · doi:10.1080/03639045.2019.1569041 · Cited by 46
Abdullah, O., Minhas, M. U., Ahmad, M., Ahmad, S., Barkat, K., & Ahmad, A. (2018) · Advances in Polymer Technology · doi:10.1002/adv.22119 · Cited by 45
Mo, C., Chai, M., Zhang, L., Ran, R., Huang, Y., & Liu, Z. (2018) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.12.070 · Cited by 45
Bal, T., & Swain, S. (2019) · DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40199-019-00237-8 · Cited by 43
Batool, N., Sarfraz, R. M., Mahmood, A., Zaman, M., Zafar, N., Salawi, A., Almoshari, Y., & Alshamrani, M. (2022) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels8030190 · Cited by 42
Self-citationRupturing cancer cells by the expansion of functionalized stimuli-responsive hydrogels
Fang, Y., Tan, J., Lim, S., & Soh, S. (2018) · NPG Asia Materials · doi:10.1038/am.2017.232 · Cited by 40
Carlos, R. F. J., Fernandes, R. D. S., de Moura, M. R., & Aouada, F. A. (2020) · Materials Today Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.100936 · Cited by 39
Olad, A., Zebhi, H., Salari, D., Mirmohseni, A., & Reyhanitabar, A. (2017) · Journal of Porous Materials · doi:10.1007/s10934-017-0479-x · Cited by 38
Akalın, G. O., & Pulat, M. (2019) · Polymer Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s00289-019-02800-4 · Cited by 36
Kanmaz, N. Z., Saloğlu, D., & Hızal, J. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Communications · doi:10.1080/00986445.2018.1550396 · Cited by 33
Wang, Y., Zhong, M., Wang, L., Liu, Y., Wang, B., & Li, Y. (2019) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101293 · Cited by 30
Zou, C., Liu, Y., Yan, X., Qin, Y., Wang, M., & Zhou, L. (2014) · Materials Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.05.025 · Cited by 27
Hassan, R. H., Gad, H. A., El-Din, S. B., Shaker, D. S., & Ishak, R. A. H. (2022) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122278 · Cited by 25
Self-citationFormulation and evaluation of interpenetrating polymeric network for controlled drug delivery
Batool, N., Mahmood, A., Sarfraz, R. M., Ijaz, H., Zafar, N., & Hussain, Z. (2021) · Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy · doi:10.1080/03639045.2021.1954939 · Cited by 15
Self-citationLino, M. E. D. S., Ruela, A. L. M., Trevisan, M. G., & Pereira, G. R. (2017) · Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry · doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6129-3 · Cited by 9
Al-Shammari, B. B. G., Al-Ali, R. M. A., & Al-Sahi, A. A. (2019) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012060 · Cited by 8
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
pH stimuli-responsive hydrogels from non-cellulosic biopolymers for drug delivery.
Vegad, U., Patel, M., Khunt, D., Zupančič, O., Chauhan, S., & Paudel, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1270364 · Cited by 85
“Based on the aforementioned fi ndings, it is highly advised to utilize manufactured hydrogels as a biocompatible carrier for the purpose of delivering active drugs to the colorectal region (Rehman et al., 2022).”
BackgroundYasmin, T., Mahmood, A., Farooq, M., Rehman, U., Sarfraz, R. M., Ijaz, H., Akram, M. R., Boublia, A., Salem-Bekhit, M. M., Ernst, B., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127032 · Cited by 65
Self-citationA review of pH-responsive chitosan-based hydrogels for drug delivery applications
Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, R., Carreón‐Álvarez, C., Cruz-Medina, C. A., Knauth, P., López, Z., Fletes-Vargas, G., & Sahagún, M. R. (2025) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2025.114173 · Cited by 46
Liaqat, H., Badshah, S. F., Minhas, M. U., Barkat, K., Khan, S. A., Hussain, M. D., & Kazi, M. (2024) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c03240 · Cited by 41
Stimuli-Responsive Dendrimers as Nanoscale Vectors in Drug and Gene Delivery Systems: A Review Study
Fard, N. T., Panahi, H. A., Moniri, E., Soltani, E. R., & Mahdavijalal, M. (2024) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-024-03280-y · Cited by 34
Fawad, M., Ali, Z., Zahid, F., Alamri, A. H., Fatease, A. M. A., Lahiq, A. A., Asiri, A. M. S., & Din, F. U. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2025.126852 · Cited by 30
Batool, N., Sarfraz, R. M., Mahmood, A., Rehman, U., Zaman, M., Akbar, S., Almasri, D. M., & Gad, H. A. (2023) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels9010060 · Cited by 23
Self-citationRetractedYasmin, T., Mahmood, A., Sarfraz, R. M., Rehman, U., Boublia, A., Alkahtani, A. M., Albakri, G. S., Ijaz, H., Ahmed, S., Haroon, B., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133468 · Cited by 23
Self-citationXu, X., Li, Z., Yao, X., Sun, N., & Chang, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2023.1173432 · Cited by 16
Urooj, I., Muhammad, G., Irfan, T., Suyama, T. L., Hussain, M. A., & Amin, M. N. (2025) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.5c07510 · Cited by 14
Noor, F., Mahmood, A., Zafar, N., Sarfraz, R. M., Rehman, U., Ijaz, H., Hussain, Z., Ahmed, I. A., Imam, M. T., Abdulmonem, W. A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104924 · Cited by 14
Self-citationAnum, S., Nimra, A., & Shah, L. A. (2026) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/d5tb02588e · Cited by 12
Liaqat, H., Minhas, M. U., Badshah, S. F., Barkat, K., Khan, S., Chopra, S., Chopra, H., Alyami, E. M., Metouekel, A., Mengistie, A. A., et al. (2026) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d5ra08622a · Cited by 11
Kumar, A., Basha, S. S., Mukilarasi, B., Vimalraj, S., Ghosh, P., & Sudhakar, S. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.144701 · Cited by 9
Chegini, M. N., Panahi, H. A., Manoochehri, M., Moniri, E., & Rafiee, A. (2023) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-023-02971-2 · Cited by 9
Arshad, S., Mahmood, A., Rehman, U., Ijaz, H., Sarfraz, R. M., Ahmad, Z., & Rahman, M. S. U. (2024) · Polymer Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s00289-024-05167-3 · Cited by 9
Self-citationAkram, S., Malik, N. S., Zeeshan, M., Tulain, U. R., Anwar, M., Mahmood, A., Javaid, A., Hussain, S., Jabeen, A., & Rahman, A. U. (2025) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2025.107359 · Cited by 7
Self-citationCapecitabine in the modern management of colon cancer: Clinical outcomes and perspectives
Sharma, N., Garg, Y., Sahoo, N. R., Saxena, S., Kumar, S., Singh, A., & Singh, A. (2024) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2024.106545 · Cited by 7
Advantages, progress, and future trends in oral medicated jellies/gels: Focus on adherence aspects
Huang, X., Mu, Y., Shen, L., & Zhao, L. (2025) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2025.104431 · Cited by 5
Rehman, M. K. U., Batool, S., Woo, S., Alamri, A. H., Fatease, A. M. A., Asiri, Z. A., Alruwaili, N. K., Rehman, M. U., & Din, F. U. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-32089-5 · Cited by 5
Salawi, A. (2026) · Drug Design Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s574417 · Cited by 4
Li, Y., Wang, X., Wu, M., Ren, J., Wang, Y., Wen, C., Sen, X., Tian, Q., Wang, Y., Guo, Y., et al. (2026) · Biomaterials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.bioadv.2026.214732 · Cited by 3
Calcium phosphate-based nanocomposites as drug delivery systems for bone tissue engineering
Khodaei, M., Bakhshi, A., & Shepherd, J. H. (2026) · Materials Today Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2026.115299 · Cited by 3
Shukur, M., Makhijani, S., Ingle, R. G., & Saifee, M. (2025) · Current Drug Delivery · doi:10.2174/0115672018320746241101052039 · Cited by 3
pH-sensitive hydrogel from Colocasia esculenta mucilage for controlled tramadol release
Noureen, S., Noreen, S., Ghumman, S. A., Batool, F., & Ahmed, N. (2025) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2025.103973 · Cited by 2
Guo, Z., He, T., Lou, Y., Xu, G., & Jia, Q. (2025) · Journal of Composites Science · doi:10.3390/jcs9080421 · Cited by 2
Li, H., Long, J., Zha, S., Zhuang, S., Liu, M., Liu, Y., Li, S., Guo, Y., & Gang, W. (2026) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels12070590 · Cited by 1
From Liquid to Gel: Multifunctional Stimuli-responsive Polymers for Targeted Oral Drug Delivery
Mishra, M. K., Shukla, D., Sharma, S., Sharma, J. N., & Singh, T. P. (2026) · AAPS PharmSciTech · doi:10.1208/s12249-026-03519-y · Cited by 1
Shah, Z. U. H., Bashir, S., Sarfraz, R. M., Mahmood, A., Rehman, U., Ijaz, H., Salem, M. M., Auda, S. H., Salem-Bekhit, M. M., Obaidullah, A. J., et al. (2024) · Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials · doi:10.1080/25740881.2024.2339281 · Cited by 1
Self-citationAun, M., Ashraf, M. U., Albukhaty, S., Rehman, U., Mahmood, A., Razzaq, A., Ijaz, H., Sarfraz, R. M., Salem, M. M., Alsubaie, A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation · doi:10.1007/s12247-025-10202-5
Self-citationZubair, M. A. B., Mahmood, A., Mahmood, A., Rehman, U., Ijaz, H., Sarfraz, R. M., & Gad, H. A. (2025) · Journal of Polymer Research · doi:10.1007/s10965-025-04645-0
Self-citationMondal, A., Dafadar, S. A., Das, I. J., Jena, K., & Bal, T. (2026) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2026.108357
Shewale, R. S., Gomte, S. S., Bishlay, J., Suthar, D., Pandey, A. K., & Jain, A. (2026) · Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy · doi:10.1080/03639045.2026.2705399
Loganathan, S., & Jayaprakash, N. (2026) · Transformative Medical Materials · doi:10.1016/j.trmm.2026.100010
Paknia, N., Soltanimehr, H., Kafshboran, H. R., & Ghasemi, S. (2026) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.70552
Metadata
- Authors
- Rehman, U., Sarfraz, R. M., Mahmood, A., Akbar, S., E. Altyar, A., Khinkar, R. M., & Gad, H. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Sargodha (PK)
- University of Chakwal (PK)
- University of the Punjab (PK)
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80260, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdulaziz University (SA)
- Ain Shams University (EG)
- Corresponding author
- Gad, Heba A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Gels
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-11-28
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 775
- ISSN
- 2310-2861 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9778381
- OpenAlex
- W4310171889
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Gels (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (RG-23-166-43)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
- Keywords
- capecitabine, pH-responsive hydrogels, chitosan, fenugreek gum, poly(maleic anhydride), controlled drug release, sustained drug release, oral drug delivery, pharmacokinetics, acute oral toxicity, colorectal cancer, swelling behavior, drug loading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review