The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global Cognitive Impairment Prevalence and Incidence in Community Dwelling Older Adults—A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
(1) Background: We proposed to review worldwide estimates of cognitive impairment prevalence and incidence in adults older than 50 years of age living in the community. (2) Methods: Systematic searches were performed in January 2019 using MEDLINE/PubMed. Articles were selected if they referred to cognitive impairment, prevalence, incidence, elders, and population or community-based studies. Analysis, aggregated by different methodologic features, was performed. (3) Results: Prevalence (80 studies) ranged between 5.1% and 41% with a median of 19.0% (25th percentile = 12.0%; 75th percentile = 24.90%). Incidence (11 studies) ranged from 22 to 76.8 per 1000 person-years with a median of 53.97 per 1000 person-years (25th percentile = 39.0; 75th percentile = 68.19). No statistically significant effects were found except for inclusion age. (4) Conclusion: We propose that the homogenization and clarification of the definition of what constitutes cognitive impairment are essential to refine the epidemiological understanding of this entity. The results of this review reinforce the importance of adherence to standardized cut-off scores for cognitive tests to promote study comparability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Late-life depression, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia
Richard, E., Reitz, C., Honig, L. H., Schupf, N., Tang, M. X., Manly, J. J., Mayeux, R., Devanand, D., & Luchsinger, J. A. (2013) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.603 · Cited by 389
Sachdev, P. S., Lipnicki, D. M., Kochan, N. A., Crawford, J. D., Thalamuthu, A., Andrews, G., Brayne, C., Matthews, F. E., Stephan, B. C. M., Lipton, R. B., et al. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142388 · Cited by 380
Manly, J. J., Bell-McGinty, S., Tang, M.-X., Schupf, N., Stern, Y., & Mayeux, R. (2005) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.62.11.1739 · Cited by 266
Mild Cognitive Impairment: Epidemiology and Dementia Risk in an Elderly Italian Population
Ravaglia, G., Forti, P., Montesi, F., Lucicesare, A., Pisacane, N., Rietti, E., Dalmonte, E., Bianchin, M., & Mecocci, P. (2008) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01503.x · Cited by 173 · cited 1×
“98) in the second group [15,28,39,96] and from 47.”
BackgroundMoretti, F., De Ronchi, D., Palmer, K., Forlani, C., Morini, V., Ferrari, B., Dalmonte, E., & Atti, A. R. (2013) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2012.732034 · Cited by 47
Cited by
Creatine monohydrate supplementation for older adults and clinical populations
Candow, D. G., Ostojic, S. M., Chilibeck, P. D., Longobardi, I., Gualano, B., Tarnopolsky, M. A., Wallimann, T., Moriarty, T., Kreider, R. B., Forbes, S. C., et al. (2025) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1080/15502783.2025.2534130 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Pais, R., Ruano, L., P. Carvalho, O., & Barros, H.
- Venue
- Geriatrics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-10-27
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 84
- ISSN
- 2308-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3097589218
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
