CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Mobile Learning in EducationInnovations in Medical EducationNursing education and management

Development and evaluation of nursing clinical practice education using m-learning.

Open access
Kim, Sungeun, Im, Mihae·2024·Healthcare
DOI 10.3390/healthcare12020206PMC PMC10815767
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study aims to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of nursing practice education using mobile learning or m-learning for nursing students. A nonequivalent control group post-test design was used. Overall, 42 nursing students participated in the study. A three-week nursing practice education program was developed using the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) model. The course was implemented on the basis of Gagne’s nine instructional situations. The findings demonstrated improvements in clinical competency (t = 7.44, p < 0.001) and problem solving (t = 2.29, p = 0.028). Accordingly, the study recommends introducing m-learning in nursing practice education using tablet PCs, as part of a newer nursing practicum training strategy that takes into account the factors identified in this study. It is also suggested that a continuous m-learning approach and development plan for nursing students be prepared to achieve technically advanced nursing practice education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/healthcare12020206

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. [1]Günay U. Kılınç G. The transfer of theoretical knowledge to clinical practice by nursing students and the difficulties they experience: A qualitative study Nurse Educ. Today 2018 65 81 86 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.031 29547811 · DOI
  2. [2]Carless-Kane S. Nowell L. Nursing students learning transfer from classroom to clinical practice: An integrative review Nurse Educ. Pract. 2023 71 103731 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103731 37517230 · DOI
  3. [3]Olaussen C. Aase I. Jelsness-Jørgensen L.P. Tvedt C.R. Steindal S.A. Supplementing clinical practice in nursing homes with simulation training: A qualitative study of nursing students’ experiences SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 6 2377960820981786 10.1177/2377960820981786 35155765 PMC8832293 · DOI
  4. [4]Park K. Kim J.K. Experience of incivility to nursing students during clinical practice J. Korean Acad. Nurs. Adm. 2017 23 524 534 10.11111/jkana.2017.23.5.524 · DOI
  5. [5]Song H.S. Lim S.H. A phenomenological study on the first clinical practice experience of nursing students AJMAHS 2019 9 533 543 10.35873/ajmahs.2019.9.5.049 · DOI
  6. [6]Shin S. Tak Y.R. Song R. Kwon S. Song J. Kim J.S. Improvement strategies for clinical nursing education to strengthen clinical competencies of nursing students: A focus group interview study J. Qual. Res. 2022 23 104 116 10.22284/qr.2022.23.2.104 · DOI
  7. [7]Willman A. Bjuresäter K. Nilsson J. Insufficiently supported in handling responsibility and demands: Findings from a qualitative study of newly graduated nurses J. Clin. Nurs. 2021 30 83 92 10.1111/jocn.15483 32889729 PMC7891354 · DOI
  8. [8]Koukourikos K. Tsaloglidou A. Kourkouta L. Papathanasiou I.V. Iliadis C. Fratzana A. Panagiotou A. Simulation in clinical nursing education Acta Inform. Med. 2021 29 15 20 10.5455/aim.2021.29.15-20 34012208 PMC8116070 · DOI
  9. [9]Hashemiparast M. Negarandeh R. Theofanidis D. Exploring the barriers of utilizing theoretical knowledge in clinical settings: A qualitative study Int. J. Nurs. Sci. 2019 6 399 405 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.09.008 31728392 PMC6838863 · DOI
  10. [10]Saifan A. Devadas B. Daradkeh F. Abdel-Fattah H. Aljabery M. Michael L.M. Solutions to bridge the theory-practice gap in nursing education in the UAE: A qualitative study BMC Med. Educ. 2021 21 490 10.1186/s12909-021-02919-x 34517861 PMC8439067 · DOI
  11. [11]Gause G. Mokgaola I.O. Rakhudu M.A. Technology usage for teaching and learning in nursing education: An integrative review Curationis 2022 45 e1 e9 10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2261 PMC9257720 35792609 · DOI
  12. [12]Suartama I.K. Setyosari P. Sulthoni S. Ulfa S. Development of ubiquitous learning environment based on Moodle learning management system Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 2020 14 182 204 10.3991/ijim.v14i14.11775 · DOI
  13. [13]Iivari N. Sharma S. Ventä-Olkkonen L. Digital transformation of everyday life—How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care? Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020 55 102183 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183 PMC7320701 32836640 · DOI
  14. [14]Fawaz M.A. Hamdan-Mansour A.M. Tassi A. Challenges facing nursing education in the advanced healthcare environment Int. J. Afr. Nurs. Sci. 2018 9 105 110 10.1016/j.ijans.2018.10.005 · DOI
  15. [15]Shuja A. Qureshi I.A. Schaeffer D.M. Zareen M. Effect of m-learning on students’ academic performance mediated by facilitation discourse and flexibility Knowl. Manag. E-Learn. 2019 11 158 200 10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.009 · DOI
  16. [16]Dennick R. Constructivism: Reflections on twenty five years teaching the constructivist approach in medical education Int. J. Med. Educ. 2016 7 200 205 10.5116/ijme.5763.de11 27344115 PMC4939219 · DOI
  17. [17]Dong H. Lio J. Sherer R. Jiang I. Some learning theories for medical educators Med. Sci. Educ. 2021 31 1157 1172 10.1007/s40670-021-01270-6 34457959 PMC8368150 · DOI
  18. [18]Kang M. Yoon H. Kim J. Kim H. Investigating the relationship among learning authenticity, learning motivation, and performance in web-based project learning J. Educ. Technol. 2008 24 23 51 10.17232/KSET.24.3.23 · DOI
  19. [19]Seo Y.H. Development and Effect of Simulation Nursing Education Program Using the Outcome-Present State-Test (OPT) Model Ph.D. Thesis Mokpo National University Mokpo, Republic of Korea 28 February 2016
  20. [20]Lee E.K. Evaluation of Internet-Based Distance Education System Operation Master’s Thesis Yonsei University Seoul, Republic of Korea 28 February 1999
  21. [21]Seong K.Y. Effects of Practice Nursing Education: Using Standardized Patients on Subcutaneous Insulin Injection Master’s Thesis Eulji University Daejeon, Republic of Korea 28 February 2008
  22. [23]Kwon K.N. Clinical Competence, Critical Thinking Disposition and Self-Leadership of Nursing Students in a City Master’s Thesis Keimyung University Daegu, Republic of Korea 28 February 2014
  23. [24]Lee J.S. The Effects of Process Behaviors on Problem Solving Performance on Various Tests Ph.D. Thesis University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA 28 February 1978
  24. [25]Woo O.H. The Effect of PBL(Problem-Based Learning) on the Problem Solving Process of Student by Their Meta-Cognitive Levels Master’s Thesis Korea National University of Education ChungBuk, Republic of Korea 2000
  25. [27]Branch M.R. Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach Springer New York, NY, USA 2009 22 163
  26. [31]Ozkale A. Koc M. Investigating academicians’ use of table PC from the perspectives of human computer interaction and technology acceptance model Int. J. Technol. Educ. Sci. 2020 4 37 52 10.46328/ijtes.v4i1.36 · DOI
  27. [32]Kim J.H. Park H. Effects of smartphone-based mobile learning in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis Asian Nurs. Res. 2019 13 20 29 10.1016/j.anr.2019.01.005 30659927 · DOI
  28. [33]Haleem A. Javaid M. Qadri M.A. Suman R. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review Sustain. Oper. Comput. 2022 3 275 285 10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [34]Miner A. Mallow J. Theeke L. Barnes E. Using Gagne’s 9 events of instruction to enhance student performance and course evaluations in undergraduate nursing course Nurse Educ. 2015 40 152 154 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000138 25628243 PMC4598645 · DOI
  30. [35]Rajaguru V. Oh J. Im M. Development and evaluation of the course on global health nursing for Indian nursing students Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022 19 1978 10.3390/ijerph19041978 35206165 PMC8871778 · DOI
  31. [36]McNeill L. Fitch D. Microlearning through the lens of Gagne’s nine events of instruction: A qualitative study TechTrends 2023 67 521 533 10.1007/s11528-022-00805-x 36345423 PMC9631595 · DOI
  32. [37]Lee S.G. Shin Y.H. Effects of self-directed feedback practice using smartphone videos on basic nursing skills, confidence in performance and learning satisfaction J. Korean Acad. Nurs. 2016 46 283 292 10.4040/jkan.2016.46.2.283 27182024 · DOI
  33. [38]Jang S. Suh E.E. Development and application of a mobile-based multimedia nursing competency evaluation system for nursing students: A mixed-method randomized controlled study Nurse Educ. Pract. 2022 64 103458 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103458 36182728 · DOI
  34. [39]Kim S.J. Shin H.W. Lee J.E. Kang S.R. Bartlett R. A smartphone application to educate undergraduate nursing students about providing care for infant airway obstruction Nurs. Educ. Tod. 2017 48 142 152 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.10.006 27810633 · DOI
  35. [40]Papastavrou E. Dimitriadou M. Tsangari H. Andreou C. Nursing students’ satisfaction of the clinical learning environment: A research study BMC Nurs. 2016 19 55 10.1186/s12912-016-0164-4 PMC4949757 27436992 · DOI
  36. [41]Fernández-García D. Moreno-Latorre E. Giménez-Espert M.D.C. Prado-Gascó V. Satisfaction with the clinical practice among nursing students using regression models and qualitative comparative analysis Nurse Educ. Today 2021 100 104861 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104861 33756175 · DOI
  37. [42]Yeo E. Kim J.B. Han S. Applying MOOC-based flipped learning to business education: Analysis of academic achievement and student satisfaction Korea Bus. Rev. 2015 19 181 202 10.17287/kbr.2015.19.4.181 · DOI
  38. [43]Afrasiabifar A. Asadolah M. Effectiveness of shifting traditional lecture to interactive lecture to teach nursing students Investig. Educ. Enferm. 2019 37 e07 10.17533/udea.iee.v37n1e07 31083844 · DOI
  39. [44]Nielsen L.M. Kirkegaard H. Østergaard L.G. Bovbjerg K. Breinholt K. Maribo T. Comparison of self-reported and performance-based measures of functional ability in elderly patients in an emergency department: Implications for selection of clinical outcome measures BMC Geriatr. 2016 16 199 10.1186/s12877-016-0376-1 27899065 PMC5129645 · DOI
  40. [45]McDaniel M.A. Schlager M.S. Discovery learning and transfer of problem-solving skills Congr. Instr. 1990 7 129 159 10.1207/s1532690xci0702_3 · DOI · Paper page
  41. [46]Gholami M. Changaee F. Karami K. Shahsavaripour Z. Veiskaramian A. Birjandi M. Effects of multiepisode case-based learning (CBL) on problem-solving ability and learning motivation of nursing students in an emergency care course J. Prof. Nurs. 2021 37 612 619 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.02.010 34016321 · DOI
  42. [47]Kang J. Seomun G. Evaluating web-based nursing education’s effects: A systematic review and meta-analysis West J. Nurs. Res. 2018 40 1677 1697 10.1177/0193945917729160 28875770 · DOI
  43. [48]O’Shea E. Self-directed learning in nurse education: A review of the literature J. Adv. Nurs. 2003 43 62 70 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02673.x 12801397 · DOI
  44. [49]Chen B. Yang T. Wang Y. Xiao L. Xu C. Shen Y. Qin Q. Wang Y. Li C. Chen F. Nursing students’ attitudes toward mobile learning: An integrative review Int. J. Nurs. Sci. 2021 8 477 485 10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.08.004 34631998 PMC8488805 · DOI
  45. [50]Park E.H. Hwang S.Y. Development and effects of an e-learning program in operating room nursing for nursing students J. Korean Acad. Nurs. 2011 41 36 46 10.4040/jkan.2011.41.1.36 21515998 · DOI
  46. [51]Shao M. Hong J.C. Zhao L. Impact of the self-directed learning approach and attitude on online learning ineffectiveness: The mediating roles of internet cognitive fatigue and flow state Front. Public Health 2022 41 927454 10.3389/fpubh.2022.927454 35991035 PMC9387909 · DOI
  47. [52]Dhawan S. Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 2020 49 5 22 10.1177/0047239520934018 · DOI
  48. [53]Park N. Exploring a new educational paradigm for the post COVID-19 era Korean J. Elem. Educ. 2021 32 17 32 10.20972/kjee.32.2.202106.17 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S., & Im, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Nursing, Daedong College, Busan 46270, Republic of Korea
  • Daegu Haany University (KR)
Corresponding author
Im, Mihae
ORCID
Venue
Healthcare
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-01-15
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
206
ISSN
2227-9032 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/healthcare12020206
PMC
PMC10815767
OpenAlex
W4390880074
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
mobile learning, nursing students, ADDIE model, clinical competence, problem solving, tablet computers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review