CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 62Corporate Social Responsibility and SustainabilityCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

Beyond COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrative Review of Global Health Crisis Influencing the Evolution and Practice of Corporate Social Responsibility

Open access
Asante Antwi, Henry, Zhou, Lulin, Xu, Xinglong, Mustafa, Tehzeeb·2021·Healthcare
DOI 10.3390/healthcare9040453PMC PMC8068852
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background: Global health crisis continues to drive the dynamics of corporate social responsibility (CSR) across industries with self-perpetuating momentum. From a historical point of view, more than a century of immense corporate fecundity has formed the ecological conditions and shaped current understanding of the effect of public health on CSR. This study sought to examine the extent to which companies are able to balance their business interest with social interest through health-related CSR and how knowledge of them can help explain the potential impact of COVID-19. Method: This study employs a narrative review of current literature; however, the integrative strategy was combined with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist to rigorously select the necessary articles for proper integrative synthesis. Results: We note that in the pursuit of their social responsibility, corporate enterprises struggle to balance the interest of society and their own interest. Genuine CSR activities such as donations are often undermined by unbridled and excessive desire to draw society on themselves to reap economic benefits are largely dominated by the need to advance. There are signals that enterprises might see COVID-19-related CSR as an entry door to increase corporate influence thereby commercializing the pandemic. Conclusions: The impact of COVID-19 on CSR is epochal. There is a moral obligation for enterprises to reform current risk assessments and collaborate more deeply with state agencies to invest in the health and safety inspections at the world place. CSR strategies must be proactive to endure other unknown pandemics with equal capacity to disrupt business operations. Companies must create innovative and regular activities to educate its stakeholders to become more committed to safeguarding future enterprise-based defense mechanism needed to diagnose, protect, treat, and rehabilitate victims and those threatened by pandemics and other emergencies that affect the stability of an organization to reduce its cost and protect revenue.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/healthcare9040453

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Organizations often face challenges implementing CSR initiatives despite their benefits.

    “Organizations often face the challenge of trying to implement Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives, even though these programs have many benefits (Antwi et al., 2021).”

    From The Role of Ethical Leadership in HRM-Driven Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) (2025) · cites this paper as Antwi et al., 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. [2]Johnson B.R. Connolly E. Carter T.S. Corporate social responsibility: The role of Fortune 100 companies in domestic and international natural disasters Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2011 18 352 369 10.1002/csr.253 · DOI
  2. [3]Auld G. Bernstein S. Cashore B. The new corporate social responsibility Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2008 33 413 435 10.1146/annurev.environ.32.053006.141106 · DOI
  3. [5]Lindgreen A. Swaen V. Campbell T.T. Corporate social responsibility practices in developing and transitional countries: Botswana and Malawi J. Bus. Ethics 2009 90 429 440 10.1007/s10551-010-0415-3 · DOI
  4. [6]Amoako G. Dartey-Baah K. Owusu-Frimpong N. Kebreti C. Corporate Social Responsibility: Perspectives of Foreign and Local Oil Marketing Companies in Ghana Communicatio 2019 45 67 92 10.1080/02500167.2020.1723661 · DOI
  5. [9]D’Aprile G. Mannarini T. Corporate social responsibility: A psychosocial multidimensional construct J. Glob. Responsib. 2012 3 48 65 10.1108/20412561211219283 · DOI
  6. [11]Flanagan W. Whiteman G. “AIDS is Not a Business”: A Study in Global Corporate Responsibility–Securing Access to Low-cost HIV Medications J. Bus. Ethics 2007 73 65 75 10.1007/s10551-006-9198-y · DOI
  7. [12]Bowen P. Allen Y. Edwards P. Cattell K. Simbayi L. Guidelines for effective workplace HIV/AIDS intervention management by construction firms Constr. Manag. Econ. 2014 32 362 381 10.1080/01446193.2014.883080 · DOI
  8. [13]Dickinson D. Stevens M. Understanding the response of large South African companies to HIV/AIDS Sahara-J J. Soc. Asp. Hiv Aids 2005 2 286 295 10.1080/17290376.2005.9724852 17601011 · DOI
  9. [14]Utuk I.G. Osungbade K.O. Obembe T.A. Adewole D.A. Oladoyin V.O. Stigmatising attitudes towards co-workers with HIV in the workplace of a metropolitan state, Southwestern Nigeria Open Aids J. 2017 11 67 10.2174/1874613601711010067 29290884 PMC5730952 · DOI
  10. [17]Uduji J.I. Okolo-Obasi E.N. Asongu S.A. Multinational oil companies in Nigeria and corporate social responsibility in the HIV/AIDS response in host communities Local Environ. 2019 24 393 416 10.1080/13549839.2019.1585770 · DOI
  11. [18]Davis G.F. Anderson P.J. Social movements and failed institutionalization: Corporate (non) response to the AIDS epidemic The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism SAGE Publications Ltd. Newbury Park, CA, USA 2008 371 388
  12. [19]Ntim C.G. Corporate governance, corporate health accounting, and firm value: The case of HIV/AIDS disclosures in Sub-Saharan Africa Int. J. Account. 2016 51 155 216 10.1016/j.intacc.2016.04.006 · DOI
  13. [20]Bolton P.L. Corporate responses to HIV/AIDS: Experience and leadership from South Africa Bus. Soc. Rev. 2008 113 277 300 10.1111/j.1467-8594.2008.00321.x · DOI
  14. [21]Mahajan A.P. Colvin M. Rudatsikira J.-B. Ettl D. An overview of HIV/AIDS workplace policies and programmes in southern Africa Aids 2007 21 S31 S39 10.1097/01.aids.0000279692.54029.a1 17666960 · DOI
  15. [22]Sanyal R.N. Neves J.S. The Valdez principles: Implications for corporate social responsibility J. Bus. Ethics 1991 10 883 890 10.1007/BF00383794 · DOI
  16. [23]Welker M.A. “Corporate security begins in the community”: Mining, the corporate social responsibility industry, and environmental advocacy in Indonesia Cult. Anthropol. 2009 24 142 179 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2009.00029.x · DOI
  17. [24]Delmas M.A. Etzion D. Nairn-Birch N. Triangulating environmental performance: What do corporate social responsibility ratings really capture? Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2013 27 255 267 10.5465/amp.2012.0123 · DOI
  18. [25]Shaukat A. Qiu Y. Trojanowski G. Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance J. Bus. Ethics 2016 135 569 585 10.1007/s10551-014-2460-9 · DOI
  19. [28]Kuo L. Yeh C.C. Yu H.C. Disclosure of corporate social responsibility and environmental management: Evidence from China Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2012 19 273 287 10.1002/csr.274 · DOI
  20. [29]Idowu S.O. Capaldi N. Zu L. Gupta A.D. Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2013 Volume 2
  21. [30]Málovics G. Csigéné N.N. Kraus S. The role of corporate social responsibility in strong sustainability J. Socio Econ. 2008 37 907 918 10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.061 · DOI
  22. [31]Reinhardt F.L. Stavins R.N. Corporate social responsibility, business strategy, and the environment Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2010 26 164 181 10.1093/oxrep/grq008 · DOI
  23. [32]Chandler D.M.C. Achieving Sustainable Drug Development through CSR: Possibility or Utopia Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2020 303 319
  24. [33]Kolk A. The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development J. World Bus. 2016 51 23 34 10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.010 · DOI
  25. [34]Alvarado-Herrera A. Bigne E. Aldas-Manzano J. Curras-Perez R. A scale for measuring consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility following the sustainable development paradigm J. Bus. Ethics 2017 140 243 262 10.1007/s10551-015-2654-9 · DOI
  26. [36]Xia B. Olanipekun A. Chen Q. Xie L. Liu Y. Conceptualising the state of the art of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry and its nexus to sustainable development J. Clean. Prod. 2018 195 340 353 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.157 · DOI
  27. [37]Annan-Diab F. Molinari C. Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the Sustainable Development Goals Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2017 15 73 83 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.006 · DOI
  28. [39]Chuang S.-P. Huang S.-J. The effect of environmental corporate social responsibility on environmental performance and business competitiveness: The mediation of green information technology capital J. Bus. Ethics 2018 150 991 1009 10.1007/s10551-016-3167-x · DOI
  29. [40]Marco-Fondevila M. Abadía J.M.M. Scarpellini S. CSR and green economy: Determinants and correlation of firms’ sustainable development Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018 25 756 771 10.1002/csr.1492 · DOI
  30. [43]Ozili P.K. Arun T. Spillover of COVID-19: Impact on the Global Economy Social Science Electronic Publishing Inc. Rochester, NY, USA 2020 10.2139/ssrn.3562570 · DOI
  31. [44]Shan C. Tang D.Y. The Value of Employee Satisfaction in Disastrous Times: Evidence from Covid-19 Social Science Electronic Publishing Inc. Rochester, NY, USA 2020 No 3560919 10.2139/ssrn.3560919 · DOI
  32. [45]Francis N.N. Pegg S. Socially distanced school-based nutrition program feeding under COVID 19 in the rural Niger Delta Extr. Ind. Soc. 2020 7 576 579 32322535 PMC7172804
  33. [46]Social Protection and Jobs Responses to COVID-19: A Real-Time Review of Country Measures. Live Document Available online: http://www.ugogentilini.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/global-review-of-social-protection-responsesto-COVID-19-2.pdf (accessed on 21 December 2020)
  34. [48]Williamson V. Murphy D. Greenberg N. COVID-19 and experiences of moral injury in front-line key workers Occup. Med. 2020 70 317 319 10.1093/occmed/kqaa052 PMC7184422 32239155 · DOI
  35. [49]Laing T. The economic impact of the Coronavirus 2019 (Covid-2019): Implications for the mining industry Extr. Ind. Soc. 2020 7 580 582 32300537 PMC7161495
  36. [51]Vaccaro A.R. Getz C.L. Cohen B.E. Cole B.J. Donnally C.J. III. Practice Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2020 28 464 470 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00379 32287086 PMC7197337 · DOI
  37. [52]Ferreira L. Access to affordable HIV/AIDS drugs: The human rights obligations of multinational pharmaceutical corporations L. Rev. 2002 71 1133 12523370
  38. [54]Long C.A. New institutional formation in the intersection of Tanzanian decentralization and HIV/AIDS interventions J. East. Afr. Stud. 2017 11 692 713 10.1080/17531055.2017.1367998 · DOI
  39. [55]Gilbert G. Cattell K. Edwards P. Bowen P. A sequential mixed methods research approach to investigating HIV/AIDS intervention management by construction organisations in South Africa Acta Structilia 2017 24 27 52 10.18820/24150487/as24i1.2 · DOI
  40. [56]Dunfee T.W. Do firms with unique competencies for rescuing victims of human catastrophes have special obligations? Corporate responsibility and the AIDS catastrophe in Sub-Saharan Africa Bus. Ethics Q. 2006 16 185 210 10.5840/beq200616222 17162832 · DOI
  41. [59]López-Pérez M.E. Melero I. Sesé F.J. Does specific CSR training for managers impact shareholder value? Implications for education in sustainable development Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2017 24 435 448 10.1002/csr.1418 · DOI
  42. [60]Taylor J. Vithayathil J. Yim D. Are corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives such as sustainable development and environmental policies value enhancing or window dressing? Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018 25 971 980 10.1002/csr.1513 · DOI
  43. [61]Osmani A. Corporate Social Responsibility for Sustainable Development in China. Recent Evolution of CSR Concepts and Practice within Chinese Firms Ph.D. Thesis Università Ca’Foscari Venezia Venice, Italy 2019
  44. [62]Barua S. Understanding Coronanomics: The Economic Implications of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Social Science Electronic Publishing Inc. Rochester, NY, USA 2020 10.2139/ssrn.3566477 · DOI
  45. [65]Jennejohn M. Nyarko J. Talley E.L. COVID-19 as a Force Majeure in Corporate Transactions Social Science Electronic Publishing Inc. Rochester, NY, USA 2020 10.2139/ssrn.3577701 · DOI
  46. [66]Ishak S. Omar A.R.C. Osman L.H. Sympathy and Benevolence of Business Entities: Evidence during the COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak Social Science Electronic Publishing Inc. Rochester, NY, USA 2020 10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i5/7177 · DOI
  47. [67]Makwara T. Mutambara M. Magagula-Hlatjwako S. A comparative literature review survey of employee HIV and AIDS-related corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices in small, micro and medium enterprises (SMMEs) in Zimbabwe and South Africa Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2019 2 339 347 10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.29 · DOI
  48. [68]Stadler J. AIDS ads: Make a commercial, make a difference? Corporate social responsibility and the media Continuum 2004 18 591 610 10.1080/1030431042000297699 · DOI
  49. [69]Rajak D. ‘HIV/AIDS is our business’: The moral economy of treatment in a transnational mining company J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 2010 16 551 571 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01639.x · DOI
  50. [70]Soobaroyen T. Ntim C.G. Social and environmental accounting as symbolic and substantive means of legitimation: The case of HIV/AIDS reporting in South Africa Account. Forum 2013 2 92 109 10.1016/j.accfor.2013.04.002 · DOI
  51. [71]Adegbite A. Amiolemen S.O. Ologeh I.O. Oyefuga I. Sustainable development policy and corporate social responsibility in business organisations in Nigeria J. Sustain. Dev. 2012 5 83 89 10.5539/jsd.v5n6p83 · DOI
  52. [73]Jenkins H. Yakovleva N. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure J. Clean. Prod. 2006 14 271 284 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.10.004 · DOI
  53. [74]Orlitzky M. Siegel D.S. Waldman D.A. Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability Bus. Soc. 2011 50 6 27 10.1177/0007650310394323 · DOI
  54. [75]Lyon T.P. Maxwell J.W. Corporate social responsibility and the environment: A theoretical perspective Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2008 2 240 260 10.1093/reep/ren004 · DOI
  55. [76]Dimmler L. Linking social determinants of health to corporate social responsibility: Extant criteria for the mining industry Extr. Ind. Soc. 2017 4 216 226 10.1016/j.exis.2017.01.006 · DOI
  56. [77]Senay E. Landrigan P.J. Assessment of environmental sustainability and corporate social responsibility reporting by large health care organizations JAMA Netw. Open 2018 1 e180975 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0975 30646093 PMC6324268 · DOI
  57. [78]Givel M. Motivation of chemical industry social responsibility through Responsible Care Health Policy 2007 81 85 92 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.05.015 16797774 · DOI
  58. [79]Kurland N.B. Baucus M. Steckler E. Business and Society in the Age of COVID-19 Business and Society Review; Wiley-Blackwell Hoboken, NJ, USA 2020
  59. [82]Boone L. Haugh D. Pain N. Salins V. Tackling the fallout from COVID-19 Economics in the Time of COVID-19 CEPR Press London, UK 2020 37
  60. [83]Nicola M. Alsafi Z. Sohrabi C. Kerwan A. Al-Jabir A. Iosifidis C. Agha M. Agha R. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus and COVID-19 pandemic: A review Int. J. Surg. 2020 78 185 193 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018 32305533 PMC7162753 · DOI · Paper page
  61. [85]Zeren F. Hizarci A. The Impact of COVID-19 Coronavirus on Stock Markets: Evidence from Selected Countries Muhasebe Finans İncelemeleri Derg. 2020 3 78 84 10.32951/mufider.706159 · DOI
  62. [86]Coussens C. Harrison M. Global Environmental Health in the 21st Century: From Governmental Regulation to Corporate Social Responsibility: Workshop Summary National Academies Press Washington, DC, USA 2007 21595107
  63. [87]Cabral L. Xu L. Seller Reputation and Price Gouging: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic Mimeo Inc. New York, NY, USA 2020 PMC8251445 34230718
  64. [89]Barro R.J. Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions and Mortality in U.S. Cities NBER Working Paper No. 27049 National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, MA, USA 2020
  65. [90]Bootsma M. Ferguson N. The Effect of Public Health Measures on the 1918 Influenza Pandemic in U.S. Cities Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007 104 7588 7593 10.1073/pnas.0611071104 17416677 PMC1849868 · DOI · Paper page
  66. [92]Caley P. Philp D.J. McCracken K. Quantifying Social Distancing Arising from Pandemic Influenza J. R. Soc. Interface 2008 5 631 639 10.1098/rsif.2007.1197 17916550 PMC3226987 · DOI
  67. [93]Liu Y. Lee J.M. Lee C. The challenges and opportunities of a global health crisis: The management and business implications of COVID-19 from an Asian perspective J. Asia Bus. Stud. 2020 19 277 297 PMC7216126 40476954
  68. [94]Cheng W. Carlin P. Carroll J. Gupta S. Rojas F.L. Montenovo L. Nguyen T.D. Schmutte I.M. Scrivner O. Simon K.I. Back to Business and (re) Employing Workers? Labor Market Activity during State COVID-19 Reopenings National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, MA, USA 2020
  69. [95]Parker L.D. The COVID-19 office in transition: Cost, efficiency and the social responsibility business case Account. Audit. Account. J. 2020 13 21 29 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4609 · DOI
  70. [97]Curson P. McCracken K. An Australian Perspective of the 1918–1919 Influenza Pandemic NSW Public Health Bull. 2014 17 103 107 17136138
  71. [99]Forster C. Australian Unemployment 1900–1940 Econ. Rec. 1965 41 426 450 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1965.tb03060.x · DOI
  72. [102]Keogh-Brown M.R. Wren-Lewis S. Edmunds W.J. Beutels P. Smith R.D. The Possible Macroeconomic Impact on the UK of an Influenza Pandemic Health Econ. 2010 19 1345 1360 10.1002/hec.1554 19816886 · DOI
  73. [103]Markel H. Lipman H.B. Navarro J.A. Sloan A. Michalsen J.R. Stern A.M. Cetron M.S. Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented by US Cities During the 1918–1919 Influenza Pandemic J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2007 298 644 654 10.1001/jama.298.6.644 17684187 · DOI
  74. [108]Fooks G. Gilmore A. Collin J. Holden C. Lee K. The limits of corporate social responsibility: Techniques of neutralization, stakeholder management and political CSR J. Bus. Ethics 2013 112 283 299 10.1007/s10551-012-1250-5 23997379 PMC3755635 · DOI
  75. [109]Wirth H. Kulczycka J. Hausner J. Koński M. Corporate Social Responsibility: Communication about social and environmental disclosure by large and small copper mining companies Resour. Policy 2016 49 53 60 10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.04.007 · DOI
  76. [110]Donthu N. Gustafsson A. Effects of COVID-19 on business and research J. Bus. Res. 2020 117 284 289 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.008 32536736 PMC7280091 · DOI · Paper page
  77. [112]Amankwah-Amoah J. Khan Z. Wood G. COVID-19 and business failures: The paradoxes of experience, scale, and scope for theory and practice Eur. Manag. J. 2021 39 179 184 10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.002 PMC7474582 38620607 · DOI · Paper page
  78. [113]Krishnamurthy S. The future of business education: A commentary in the shadow of the Covid-19 pandemic J. Bus. Res. 2020 117 1 5 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.034 32501309 PMC7241349 · DOI
  79. [114]Bansal P. Grewatsch S. Sharma G. How COVID-19 informs business sustainability research: It’s time for a systems perspective J. Manag. Stud. 2021 58 602 606 10.1111/joms.12669 · DOI
  80. [115]Haines K.J. Berney S. Physiotherapists during COVID-19: Usual business, in unusual times J. Physiother. 2020 66 67 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.03.012 32291227 PMC7128648 · DOI
  81. [116]Bartik A.W. Bertrand M. Cullen Z. Glaeser E.L. Luca M. Stanton C. The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations PNAS 2020 117 17656 17666 10.1073/pnas.2006991117 32651281 PMC7395529 · DOI
  82. [117]Brammer S. Branicki L. Linnenluecke M.K. COVID-19, Societalization, and the Future of Business in Society Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2020 34 493 507 10.5465/amp.2019.0053 · DOI
  83. [118]Verma S. Gustafsson A. Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach J. Bus. Res. 2020 118 253 261 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.057 32834211 PMC7330579 · DOI
  84. [119]Gostin L.O. Wiley L.F. Governmental public health powers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stay-at-home orders, business closures, and travel restrictions JAMA 2020 323 2137 2138 10.1001/jama.2020.5460 32239184 · DOI
  85. [120]Daniels M.J. Cohen M.G. Bavry A.A. Kumbhani D.J. Reperfusion of ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction in the COVID-19 era: Business as usual? Circulation 2020 141 1948 1950 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047122 32282225 PMC7294590 · DOI
  86. [121]Bartik A.W. Bertrand M. Cullen Z.B. Glaeser E.L. Luca M. Stanton C.T. How are small businesses adjusting to COVID-19? Early evidence from a survey Natl. Bur. Econ. Res. 2020 10.3386/w26989 · DOI
  87. [122]Czeisler M.É. Tynan M.A. Howard M.E. Honeycutt S. Fulmer E.B. Kidder D.P. Robbins R. Barger L.K. Facer-Childs E.R. Baldwin G. Public attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs related to COVID-19, stay-at-home orders, nonessential business closures, and public health guidance—United States, New York City, and Los Angeles, 5–12 May 2020 MMWR 2020 69 751 10.15585/mmwr.mm6924e1 32555138 PMC7302477 · DOI
  88. [123]de Caro F. Hirschmann T.M. Verdonk P. Returning to orthopaedic business as usual after COVID-19: Strategies and options Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2020 28 1699 1704 10.1007/s00167-020-06031-3 32342140 PMC7185264 · DOI
  89. [124]Balla-Elliott D. Cullen Z.B. Glaeser E.L. Luca M. Stanton C.T. Business reopening decisions and demand forecasts during the COVID-19 pandemic Natl. Bur. Econ. Res. 2020 10.3386/w27362 · DOI
  90. [126]Akpan I.J. Udoh E.A. Adebisi B. Small business awareness and adoption of state-of-the-art technologies in emerging and developing markets, and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic J. Small Bus. Entrep. 2020 25 1 8 10.1080/08276331.2020.1820185 · DOI
  91. [127]Verbeke A. Yuan W. A few implications of the covid-19 pandemic for international business strategy research J. Manag. stud. 2021 58 597 601 10.1111/joms.12665 · DOI
  92. [128]Worlds: Business and Networks during COVID-19 Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14660970.2020.1782719 (accessed on 9 April 2021) · DOI
  93. [129]Commonwealth Bureau of Census and Statistics, Canberra Official Year Book of the Commonwealth of Australia Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/134049c0 (accessed on 9 April 2021)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asante Antwi, H., Zhou, L., Xu, X., & Mustafa, T.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Health and Public Policy Research, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang 212013, China
  • Jiangsu University (CN)
ORCID
Xu, Xinglong
Venue
Healthcare
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-04-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
453
ISSN
2227-9032 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/healthcare9040453
PMC
PMC8068852
OpenAlex
W3153021880
Cited by
62
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71904066)
  • Social science application research project of Jiangsu Province (19SYB-095, 20SHD002)
  • Universities’ Philosophy and Social Science Researches in Jiangsu Province (2019SJA1884)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Keywords
corporate social responsibility, COVID-19 pandemic, global health crisis, corporate philanthropy, pandemic preparedness, stakeholder engagement, corporate risk assessment, public-private collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review