Cited by 56Mercury impact and mitigation studiesHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

Mercury Toxicity and Contamination of Households from the Use of Skin Creams Adulterated with Mercurous Chloride (Calomel)

Open access
Copan, Lori, Fowles, Jeff, Barreau, Tracy, McGee, Nancy·2015·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Inorganic mercury, in the form of mercurous chloride, or calomel, is intentionally added to some cosmetic products sold through informal channels in Mexico and the US for skin lightening and acne treatment. These products have led to multiple cases of mercury poisoning but few investigations have addressed the contamination of cream users’ homes. We report on several cases of mercury poisoning among three Mexican-American families in California from use of mercury-containing skin creams. Each case resulted in widespread household contamination and secondary contamination of family members. Urine mercury levels in cream users ranged from 37 to 482 µg/g creatinine and in non-users from non-detectable to 107 µg/g creatinine. Air concentrations of up to 8 µg/m3 of mercury within homes exceeded the USEPA/ATSDR health-based guidance and action level of <1.0 μg/m3. Mercury contamination of cream users’ homes presented a multi-pathway exposure environment to residents. Homes required extensive decontamination, including disposal of most household items, to achieve acceptable air levels. The acceptable air levels used were not designed to consider multi-pathway exposure scenarios. These findings support that the calomel is able to change valence form to elemental mercury and volatilize once exposed to the skin or surfaces in the indoor environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph120910943

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of products like Deluxe Silken can lead to symptoms of mercury poisoning including Nephrotic Syndrome.

    “Deluxe Silken is approximately 14,000 times the recommended limit for Mercury and use of products of this kind can lead to symptoms of Mercury poisoning including Nephrotic Syndrome as have been documented in the US,14,29 Barbados5 and Indonesia.30”

    From The Evaluation of Total Mercury and Arsenic in Skin Bleaching Creams Commonly used in Trinidad and Tobago and their Potential Risk to the People of the Caribbean (2017) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction and Results §3.1 document mercury poisoning from adulterated skin creams in US cases. The Discussion (§4) says the kidney is a sensitive target of mercury toxicity, but reports minimal clinical signs of kidney damage in its cases; it does not document nephrotic syndrome. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 56

Authors
Copan, L., Fowles, J., Barreau, T., & McGee, N.
Affiliations
  • California Department of Public Health (US)
  • California Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Investigations Branch, Richmond, CA 94706, USA
  • California Department of Toxic Substances Control (US)
Corresponding author
Copan, Lori
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2015-09-02
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
10943-10954
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157543490
Cited by
56
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • California Department of Public Health
  • University of California, San Francisco
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
mercury toxicity, mercurous chloride, calomel, skin bleaching creams, secondary exposure, decontamination, Mexican American families
MeSH terms
Adolescent, California, Cosmetics, Drug Contamination, Environmental Exposure, Family, Humans, Infant, Male, Mercury Poisoning, Mexico, United States, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Mercury Compounds, Skin Cream

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review