The Evaluation of Total Mercury and Arsenic in Skin Bleaching Creams Commonly used in Trinidad and Tobago and their Potential Risk to the People of the Caribbean
Open accessAbstract
Background: Skin lightening is very popular among women and some men of the Caribbean, and its popularity appears to be growing. The lightening of skin colour is done to produce a lighter complexion which is believed to increase attractiveness, social standing and improves one's potential of being successful. Design and Methods: Fifteen (15) common skin lightening creams found in pharmacies and cosmetic retailers throughout Trinidad and Tobago were evaluated for Mercury by Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (CVAAS) and Arsenic by Hydride Generation Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (HGAAS). The results obtained were compared to global standards and previous research. Results: Fourteen (14) of the fifteen samples analysed contained Mercury in the range of 0.473 μg/g to 0.766 μg/g. One sample had a Mercury content of 14,507.74±490.75 μg/g which was over 14,000 times higher than the USFDA limit for mercury in cosmetics of 1 μg/g. All samples contained Arsenic in the range 1.016 μg/g to 6.612 μg/g, which exceeds the EU limit for cosmetics of 0 μg/g. Conclusions: All the samples analysed contained significant amounts of Mercury and Arsenic and none of them can be considered safe for prolonged human use. The samples that contained Mercury levels which were lower than the USFDA limit contained Arsenic levels which exceeded the EU standard of 0 μg/g in cosmetics. The popularity of these skin lightening creams in the Caribbean region places the population at elevated risk of chronic Mercury and Arsenic poisoning and possibly acute Mercury Poisoning.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Fifteen skin-lightening creams commonly sold in Trinidad and Tobago were analyzed for total mercury and arsenic; all contained both metals, and none could be considered safe for prolonged human use. One cream contained mercury at 14,507.74±490.75 µg/g, over 14,000 times the USFDA cosmetic limit of 1 µg/g, while all samples contained arsenic at 1.016–6.612 µg/g, exceeding the EU limit of 0 µg/g.
Key findings
- Fourteen of fifteen samples contained mercury at 0.473–0.766 µg/g, below the USFDA limit of <1 µg/g but above the EU limit of 0 µg/g; one sample, Deluxe Silken, contained 14,507.74±490.75 µg/g, or 1.8% ammoniated mercury, versus its label claim of 3% ammoniated mercury.
- All fifteen samples contained arsenic, ranging from 1.016 µg/g (Fair & White) to 6.612 µg/g (Symba Crème Skin Lite N Smooth), exceeding the EU limit of 0 µg/g and exceeding previous reported cosmetic arsenic levels by up to 30 times.
- In fourteen of fifteen samples, arsenic levels exceeded mercury levels; no clear pattern by place of manufacture and no association between arsenic and mercury content were observed.
- The authors conclude that none of the samples can be considered safe for prolonged use, and that popular use of these creams places users and close contacts at risk of chronic mercury and arsenic poisoning and possibly acute mercury poisoning.
Methods
- Fifteen commonly used skin-lightening creams were purchased in October 2016 from pharmacies and cosmetic outlets throughout Trinidad; nine were manufactured in the EU, four in India, one in the UK, and one in Jamaica, with manufacture dates from June 2014 to August 2016.
- Approximately 0.5 g of each sample was digested in triplicate with nitric/perchloric acid at 130°C for 8 hours; total mercury was analyzed by Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (CVAAS) and total arsenic by Hydride Generation Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (HGAAS) after reduction with KI.
- Method validation used DORM-4 certified reference material and spiked Papaya White samples; recoveries ranged from 97.2% to 103.8% with standard deviations <5%, and detection limits were 0.17 µg/kg for mercury and 0.21 µg/kg for arsenic.
Limitations
- The paper states that no differentiation between organic and inorganic metals was addressed, and that further research is required to assess heavy metals in other cosmetic products, including indigenous products.
- Evident from the text: the sample was limited to fifteen creams purchased in Trinidad, with no clinical health outcomes, biomarkers, or exposure data from users or households.
- Evident from the text: arsenic has no USFDA or WHO acceptable cosmetic limit, so comparisons rely on the EU ban/0 µg/g standard; also, cosmetics in the region are not required by local law to list all ingredients, and arsenic was not listed on any product label.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
15 of 46 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The threat of mercury poisoning is real in the Caribbean.
“The Caribbean population was previously believed to be under threat of mercury poisoning due to its higher than average fish consumption, however recent research including work by Drescher et al,5 Mckelvey et al.14 and this current study indicates that the threat of Mercury poisoning is indeed real in the Caribbean, but may be more due to its cultural use of skin lightening creams than fish cons”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Drescher et al,5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Mckelvey et al.14 McKelvey W Jeffery N Clark N Population-based inorganic mercury biomonitoring and the identification of skin care products as a source of exposure in New York City. Environ Health Perspect 2011; 119: 203. 20923743 PMC3040607 source
The Discussion (page not provided) reports inorganic mercury exposure from skin-lightening creams among Dominicans and possibly Caribbean groups in New York City. It does not establish mercury poisoning in the Caribbean itself, or show that creams pose a greater threat there than fish consumption. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Long-term arsenic exposure is associated with a range of chronic health effects including hyperpigmentation, palmar and solar keratosis, diarrhoea and vomiting, skin changes and neuropathy, ischemic heart disease, confusion and memory loss, respiratory disease and a higher risk of diabetes.
“Other symptoms may include hyperpigmentation, palmar and solar keratosis, diarrhoea and vomiting, skin changes and neuropathy,36 ischemic heart disease, 38 confusion and memory loss,23 respiratory disease and a higher risk of diabetes.39,40”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [36] Ratnaike RN Acute and chronic arsenic toxicity. Postgrad Med J 2003; 79: 391- 6. 12897217 PMC1742758 source
- cites [38] Hsueh YM Wu WL Huang YL Low serum carotene level and increased risk of ischemic heart disease related to long-term arsenic exposure. Atherosclerosis 1998; 141: 249- 57. 9862173 source
- cites [23] Naujokas MF Anderson B Ahsan H The broad scope of health effects from chronic arsenic exposure: update on a worldwide public health problem. Environ Health Perspect 2013; 121: 295. 23458756 PMC3621177 source
- Interpretationcitation
Use of products like Deluxe Silken can lead to symptoms of mercury poisoning including Nephrotic Syndrome.
“Deluxe Silken is approximately 14,000 times the recommended limit for Mercury and use of products of this kind can lead to symptoms of Mercury poisoning including Nephrotic Syndrome as have been documented in the US,14,29 Barbados5 and Indonesia.30”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked- cites [14] McKelvey W Jeffery N Clark N Population-based inorganic mercury biomonitoring and the identification of skin care products as a source of exposure in New York City. Environ Health Perspect 2011; 119: 203. 20923743 PMC3040607 source
The paper’s Discussion reports US poisonings associated with mercury-containing skin-lightening creams, and its introductory toxicity passage says topical mercury can damage the kidneys (page not supplied). It does not identify Deluxe Silken or mention nephrotic syndrome, so it supports the general risk but not that specific condition or product. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [29] Copan L Fowles J Barreau T McGee N. Mercury toxicity and contamination of households from the use of skin creams adulterated with mercurous chloride (Calomel). Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 12: 10943- 54. 26364641 PMC4586653 source
The Introduction and Results §3.1 document mercury poisoning from adulterated skin creams in US cases. The Discussion (§4) says the kidney is a sensitive target of mercury toxicity, but reports minimal clinical signs of kidney damage in its cases; it does not document nephrotic syndrome. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [5] Drescher O Dewailly E Krimholtz M Rutchik J. Fishy makeup on the hook for mercury exposure: a case series. W Indian Med J 2013; 62: 770- 2. 25014866 source
- cites [30] Soo YO-Y Chow K-M Lam CW-K A whitened face woman with nephrotic syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41: 250- 3. 12500245 source
- Premisecitation
Alquadami et al. in 2013 found arsenic levels in 34 skin whitening creams ranging from 0.34 to 14.76 μg/g.
“Alquadami et al. in 2013,34 who found Arsenic levels in thirty-four (34) skin whitening creams ranging from a low of 0.34 μg/g to a high of 14.76 μg/g.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] ALqadami AA Abdalla MA ALOthman ZA Omer K. Application of solid phase extraction on multiwalled carbon nanotubes of some heavy metal ions to analysis of skin whitening cosmetics using ICP-AES. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013; 10: 361- 74. 23343988 PMC3564147 source
Methods §2.3 reports 34 skin-whitening cosmetics, and Results §3.8 reports a minimum arsenic concentration of 0.34 µg/g. But §3.8 and Table 8 give the maximum as 15.36 µg/g (sample 19); the cited 14.76 µg/g is the concentration in sample 25, not the maximum. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
When in the body, arsenic can accumulate in hair, skin and nails and result in chronic health effects.
“When in the body Arsenic can accumulate in hair, skin and nails and result in chronic health effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Ratnaike RN Acute and chronic arsenic toxicity. Postgrad Med J 2003; 79: 391- 6. 12897217 PMC1742758 source
- Premisecitation
Long-term chronic exposure to arsenic can lead to multisystem failure as a result of various cancers.
“Long term chronic exposure to arsenic can lead to multisystem failure as a result of various cancers.36”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Ratnaike RN Acute and chronic arsenic toxicity. Postgrad Med J 2003; 79: 391- 6. 12897217 PMC1742758 source
The Chronic poisoning section says long-term arsenic toxicity leads to multisystem disease and that malignancy is its most serious consequence. The Malignant disease section identifies cancers in numerous organs. Neither says that cancers cause multisystem failure; the claim adds that causal link and substitutes failure for disease. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingnone given
Arsenic was not listed as a component of any of the products on the labels.
“It should be noted that arsenic was not listed as a component of any of these products on the labels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The fourteen samples with mercury levels below 1 μg/g exceeded the EU limit of 0 μg/g.
“These values were below the USFDA recommended limit of <1.0 μg/g, but exceeds the EU limit of 0 μg/g.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All fifteen skin lightening creams analysed contained arsenic at concentrations between 1.016 μg/g and 6.612 μg/g.
“All samples contained Arsenic in the range 1.016 μg/g to 6.612 μg/g, which exceeds the EU limit for cosmetics of 0 μg/g.”
- Also stated in: § Arsenic · plain
“The levels of arsenic found in this current study exceeds those previously reported by those researchers by up to 30 times the amount, with the lowest value being 1.016 μg/g (Fair & White) and the highest being 6.612 μg/g (Symba Crème Skin Lite N Smooth).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Arsenic · plain
- Findingown data
Deluxe Silken had on its label a content of 3% Ammoniated Mercury [Hg(NH2)Cl].
“This product has on its label a content of 3% Ammoniated Mercury [Hg(NH2)Cl], which contains 24,000 μg/g of elemental Mercury.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no clear pattern distinguishing arsenic levels in the creams by place of manufacture.
“There was no clear pattern that could be observed that distinguishes the Arsenic levels in the creams by place of manufacture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Arsenic concentrations were as much as 10 times higher than the corresponding mercury concentrations in some of the creams analysed.
“The Arsenic concentrations were as much as 10 times higher than the corresponding Mercury concentrations in some of the creams analysed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The levels of arsenic found in the skin lightening creams were higher than the levels of mercury in all samples except Deluxe Silken.
“The results obtained also showed that the levels of Arsenic found in the skin lightening creams were higher than the levels of Mercury in all samples except Deluxe Silken where the active ingredient listed was Ammoniated Mercury.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One skin lightening cream, Deluxe Silken, contained mercury at a concentration of 14,507.74 ± 490.75 μg/g.
“One sample had a Mercury content of 14,507.74±490.75 μg/g which was over 14,000 times higher than the USFDA limit for mercury in cosmetics of 1 μg/g.”
- Also stated in: § Mercury · plain
“All fifteen samples contained Mercury, with Deluxe Silken having the highest concentration of 14,507.741±490.75 μg/g.”
- Also stated in: § Mercury · plain
“Our analysis determined the concentration of mercury in Deluxe Silken to be 14,507.741 μg/g or 1.8% Ammoniated Mercury.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Mercury · plain
- Findingown data
All fifteen samples contained mercury.
“All fifteen samples contained Mercury, with Deluxe Silken having the highest concentration of 14,507.741±490.75 μg/g.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“This study revealed that all samples analysed did contain significant level of Mercury and Arsenic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
- Findingown data
Fourteen of the fifteen skin lightening creams analysed contained mercury at concentrations between 0.473 μg/g and 0.766 μg/g.
“Fourteen (14) of the fifteen samples analysed contained Mercury in the range of 0.473 μg/g to 0.766 μg/g.”
- Also stated in: § Mercury · plain
“Of the fifteen samples analysed, fourteen contained Mercury levels less than 1 μg/g, with levels ranging from a low of 0.473 μg/g to a high of 0.766 μg/g.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Mercury · plain
- Findingown data
No association between arsenic and mercury content was observed.
“Neither were any association between Arsenic and Mercury content observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The mercury concentration in Deluxe Silken correlates well with the 13,546 μg/g found by Hamann et al. in Deluxe Nadinola Bleaching Cream from Jamaica.
“This value correlates well with the findings of Hamann et al.24 who found 13,546 μg/g in Deluxe Nadinola Bleaching Cream from Jamaica, the predecessor product of Deluxe Silken.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hamann et al.24 Hamann CR Boonchai W Wen L Spectrometric analysis of mercury content in 549 skin-lightening products: Is mercury toxicity a hidden global health hazard? J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 70: 281- 7. 24321702 source
- Interpretationown data
The mercury concentration in Deluxe Silken corresponds to 1.8% Ammoniated Mercury.
“Our analysis determined the concentration of mercury in Deluxe Silken to be 14,507.741 μg/g or 1.8% Ammoniated Mercury.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The levels of arsenic found in this study exceed those previously reported by Adepoju-Bello et al. and Hepp et al. by up to 30 times.
“The levels of arsenic found in this current study exceeds those previously reported by those researchers by up to 30 times the amount, with the lowest value being 1.016 μg/g (Fair & White) and the highest being 6.612 μg/g (Symba Crème Skin Lite N Smooth).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Adepoju-Bello et al.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Hepp et al.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
The DORM-4 results agreed with certified values by 98% and 101% for mercury and arsenic respectively.
“These results agreed with the certified values by 98% and 101% for Mercury and Arsenic respectively and with standard deviations of less than 10%, the precision of the method is also acceptable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
None of the samples analysed can be considered safe for prolonged human use.
“All the samples analysed contained significant amounts of Mercury and Arsenic and none of them can be considered safe for prolonged human use.”
- Also stated in: § Mercury · plain
“Therefore, none of the samples analysed can be considered safe for use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Mercury · plain
- Interpretationown data
All samples contained arsenic at levels exceeding the EU limit for cosmetics of 0 μg/g.
“All samples contained Arsenic in the range 1.016 μg/g to 6.612 μg/g, which exceeds the EU limit for cosmetics of 0 μg/g.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“The samples that contained Mercury levels which were lower than the USFDA limit contained Arsenic levels which exceeded the EU standard of 0 μg/g in cosmetics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Interpretationown data
The mercury concentration in Deluxe Silken was over 14,000 times the USFDA limit for mercury in cosmetics of 1 μg/g.
“which was over 14,000 times higher than the USFDA limit for mercury in cosmetics of 1 μg/g.”
- Also stated in: § Mercury · plain
“Deluxe Silken is approximately 14,000 times the recommended limit for Mercury and use of products of this kind can lead to symptoms of Mercury poisoning including Nephrotic Syndrome as have been documented in the US,14,29 Barbados5 and Indonesia.30”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Mercury · plain
- Interpretationcitation
The results obtained compared well with Alquadami et al. 2013 who found arsenic levels in 34 skin whitening creams ranging from 0.34 to 14.76 μg/g.
“The results obtained however compared well with previous research by Alquadami et al. in 2013,34 who found Arsenic levels in thirty-four (34) skin whitening creams ranging from a low of 0.34 μg/g to a high of 14.76 μg/g.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alquadami et al. in 2013,34
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
The precision of the method is acceptable with standard deviations of less than 10%.
“These results agreed with the certified values by 98% and 101% for Mercury and Arsenic respectively and with standard deviations of less than 10%, the precision of the method is also acceptable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Triplicate analysis of DORM-4 gave mercury and arsenic levels of 403.8±39.7 μg/kg and 6941.8±486.1 μg/kg, respectively.
“Triplicate analysis of DORM-4 gave Mercury and Arsenic levels of 403.8±39.7 μg/kg and 6941.8±486.1 μg/kg respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Mercury-based skin lightening creams have been found to elevate the body's mercury levels in non-users who share the same household with users.
“Mercury based skin lightening creams have been found to elevate the body’s Mercury levels in non-users of the product who share the same household with users of Mercury based skin lightening products.17”
- Also stated in: § Mercury and arsenic as skin bleaching agents · plain
“Research by the CDC in 2010 revealed that Mercury vapours emanating from Mercury based skin lightening products was responsible for elevated Mercury levels in resident non-users of skin lightening products.17”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] CDC. Mercury exposure among household users and nonusers of skin-lightening creams produced in Mexico-California and Virginia, 2010. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 2012; 61: 33. 22258417
- Also stated in: § Mercury and arsenic as skin bleaching agents · plain
- Premisecitation
A study by Drescher et al. conducted in Barbados in 2010 revealed that skin bleaching and not fish consumption was responsible for elevated mercury levels in middle aged women working in the fishing industry with symptoms of chronic mercury poisoning.
“A study by Drescher et al.5 conducted in Barbados in 2010 revealed that it was skin bleaching and not fish consumption that was responsible for elevated mercury levels in middle aged women working in the fishing industry with the accompanying symptoms of chronic mercury poisoning being observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Drescher O Dewailly E Krimholtz M Rutchik J. Fishy makeup on the hook for mercury exposure: a case series. W Indian Med J 2013; 62: 770- 2. 25014866 source
- Premisecitation
Many studies have revealed levels of mercury in skin bleach exceeding the limits set by WHO.
“Many of these studies have revealed levels of mercury in skin bleach exceeding the limits set by WHO.16”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] WHO. Mercury in Skin Lightening Products: WHO; 2011 Available from: http://www.who.int/ipcs/assessment/public_health/mercury_flyer.pdf.
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The risks associated with skin bleaching practice are very high, not just for male and female users, but also members of their associated households, co-workers, and persons in close physical proximity.
“Based on this study, the risks associated with the practice is very high, not just for both male and female users, but also members of their associated households, co-workers, and persons in close physical proximity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The mercury concentration in Deluxe Silken poses a threat to fellow householders, co-workers and persons in close physical proximity to users who are exposed to mercury vapours emanating from the product container and by extension the skin of the user.
“In addition, the Mercury concentration found in this particular product also poses a threat to fellow householders17 co-workers and persons in close physical proximity to the users and who are exposed to Mercury vapours emanating from the product container and by extension the skin of the user.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] CDC. Mercury exposure among household users and nonusers of skin-lightening creams produced in Mexico-California and Virginia, 2010. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 2012; 61: 33. 22258417
- Premisecitation
Adepoju-Bello et al. in 2012 found very low levels of arsenic in cosmetics including skin bleaching creams in the range of 0.006 to 0.013 μg/g.
“Adepoju-Bello et al. in 201233 found very low levels of Arsenic in cosmetics including skin bleaching creams in the range of 0.006 μg/g to 0.013 μg/g.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Adepoju-Bello A Oguntibeju O Adebisi R Evaluation of the concentration of toxic metals in cosmetic products in Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol 2012; 11: 16360- 4.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The EU limit for mercury in cosmetics is 0 μg/g.
“These values were below the USFDA recommended limit of <1.0 μg/g, but exceeds the EU limit of 0 μg/g.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites EU
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Hepp et al. in 2014 found traces of arsenic in body lotions ranging from trace levels to 0.2 μg/g.
“Hepp et al. in 201420 found traces of Arsenic in body lotions ranging from trace levels to 0.2 ug/g.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Hepp NM Mindak WR Gasper JW Survey of cosmetics for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, mercury, and nickel content. J Cosmet Sci 2014; 65: 125- 45. 25043485
- Interpretationreasoning
The threat of mercury poisoning in the Caribbean may be more due to cultural use of skin lightening creams than fish consumption.
“but may be more due to its cultural use of skin lightening creams than fish consumption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Inorganic mercury applied as creams on the skin can enter the body via absorption through the skin, inhalation or orally.
“Inorganic Mercury applied as creams on the skin can enter the body readily via absorption through the skin, inhalation or orally,18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] USFDA. Laws & Regulations - Prohibited & Restricted Ingredients. USFDA-Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition; 2015 [updated 1/26/2015. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/guidanceregulation/lawsregulations/ ucm127406.htm.
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Mercury and arsenic levels present in skin lightening products do pose a risk to public health mostly due to their prolific use throughout the Caribbean region and the levels of the metals found in the more commonly used skin lightening creams.
“Mercury and Arsenic levels present in skin lightening products do pose a risk to public health mostly due to its prolific use throughout the Caribbean region as well as the levels of the metals found in the more commonly used skin lightening creams.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Skin lightening practices have been commonly used by individuals of darker skin tones from the African and East Indian populations.
“Skin lightening practices such as the use of skin lightening or bleaching creams have been commonly used by individuals of darker skin tones from the African and East Indian populations.3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Dlova N Hamed S Tsoka Gwegweni J Grobler A. Skin lightening practices: an epidemiological study of South African women of African and Indian ancestries. Br J Dermatol 2015; 173: 2- 9. 26207658 source
- Premisecitation
The USFDA acceptable level of mercury in cosmetics other than products intended for use in the region of the eye is <1 μg/g.
“Under the USFDA guidelines,18 the acceptable level of mercury in cosmetics other than products intended for use in the region of the eye is <1 μg/g.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] USFDA. Laws & Regulations - Prohibited & Restricted Ingredients. USFDA-Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition; 2015 [updated 1/26/2015. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/guidanceregulation/lawsregulations/ ucm127406.htm.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Low levels of mercury-based skin lightening creams used during pregnancy and lactation have been found to impair infant development.
“Low levels of Mercury based skin lightening creams used during pregnancy and lactation have been found to impair infant development.32”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Dórea JG Additional comments to Potential health consequences of applying mercury-containing skin-lightening creams during pregnancy and lactation periods. Int J Hygiene Environ Health 2016; 219: 920- 1. 27451074 source
- Premisecitation
Mercury levels as low as 0.319 μg/g in skin lightening creams have been found to cause histopathological changes to brain, liver and kidney tissue in mice.
“Mercury levels as low as 0.319 μg/g in skin lightening creams have been found to cause histopathological changes to brain, liver and kidney tissue in mice.31”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Al-Saleh I El-Doush I Shinwari N Does low mercury containing skin-lightening cream (fair & lovely) affect the kidney, liver, and brain of female mice? Cutan Ocular Toxicol 2005; 24: 11- 29. 17040886 source
- Premisecitation
Long-term exposure to inorganic mercury due to repeated applications can result in kidney damage, skin discoloration, rashes, peripheral neuropathy, and psychosocial issues.
“long-term exposure due to repeated applications can result in a number of damaging effects which include kidney damage, skin discoloration, rashes, peripheral neuropathy, and psychosocial issues.11”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Ladizinski B Mistry N Kundu RV Widespread use of toxic skin lightening compounds: medical and psychosocial aspects. Dermatol Clin 2011; 29: 111- 23. 21095535 source
- Premisecitation
The EU limit for arsenic in cosmetics is 0 μg/g.
“which exceeds the EU limit for cosmetics of 0 μg/g.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“exceeded the EU standard of 0 μg/g in cosmetics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites EU
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
- May combine two claims. 16
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe presence of arsenic in these skin lightening lotions may be due to the existence of the substances in the raw material used in manufacturing, the use of lower quality materials particularly fillers and pigments, or unintentional migration of the metal from wear and corrosion of metallic devices and machinery used in the manufacturing process.
“The presence of Arsenic in these skin lightening lotions, may be due to the existence of the substances in the raw material used in the manufacturing of the products as well the use of lower quality materials in its manufacture particularly fillers and pigments.23 Arsenic contamination may also be as a result of unintentional migration of the metal from wear and corrosion of metallic devices and”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] Naujokas MF Anderson B Ahsan H The broad scope of health effects from chronic arsenic exposure: update on a worldwide public health problem. Environ Health Perspect 2013; 121: 295. 23458756 PMC3621177 source
The Abstract discusses arsenic contamination from natural deposits and industrial activities, but not contamination of skin-lightening lotions. Searches for lotions, raw materials, fillers, pigments, and corrosion of manufacturing equipment found no passage addressing the proposed mechanisms. The Health Outcomes section discusses skin effects of arsenic exposure, not how arsenic enters lotions. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] CDC. CDC-NBP-Factsheet - Arsenic: CDC; 2016 Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/biomonitoring/Arsenic_ FactSheet.html.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationArsenic can enter the body via inhalation, ingestion and via the skin.
“The levels of Arsenic observed can enter the body via inhalation, ingestion and via the skin.36”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Ratnaike RN Acute and chronic arsenic toxicity. Postgrad Med J 2003; 79: 391- 6. 12897217 PMC1742758 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent publications have reported that mercury is still being used in many skin lightening products found in Mexico, Africa, The United States and Asia.
“Recent publications have reported that mercury is still being used in many skin lightening products found in Mexico,12 Africa,13 The United States14 and Asia.15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [12] Peregrino CP Moreno MV Miranda SV Mercury levels in locally manufactured Mexican skin-lightening creams. Int J Environment Res Public Health 2011; 8: 2516- 23. PMC3138038 21776243 source
- cites [13] Agorku ES Kwaansa-Ansah EE Voegborlo RB Mercury and hydroquinone content of skin toning creams and cosmetic soaps, and the potential risks to the health of Ghanaian women. Springerplus 2016; 5: 319. 27065161 PMC4788657 source
- cites [14] McKelvey W Jeffery N Clark N Population-based inorganic mercury biomonitoring and the identification of skin care products as a source of exposure in New York City. Environ Health Perspect 2011; 119: 203. 20923743 PMC3040607 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOnly the European Union is known to have strict regulations against arsenic, banning it from use in cosmetics.
“Although past studies have shown that Arsenic is present in a range of cosmetic products such as eye shadows, lotions and lipsticks, only the European Union is known to have strict regulations against the metal, banning it from use in cosmetics.35”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Ullah H Noreen S Rehman A Comparative study of heavy metals content in cosmetic products of different countries marketed in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Arab J Chem 2017; 10: 10- 8. source
In §1.1.2 (page unavailable), the paper says an EU directive banned certain heavy metals in cosmetics, but its list does not include arsenic. Its discussion of regulatory limits (page unavailable) also gives a Canadian limit for arsenic in cosmetics. The paper therefore does not support the claimed EU ban on arsenic or the claim that only the EU regulates it. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearchers have found that many skin whitening products do contain some level of mercury although none were declared in the ingredient list or labelling.
“researchers have found that many skin whitening products do contain some level of mercury although none were declared in the ingredient list or labelling.26”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Dlova NC Hendricks NE Martincgh BS Skinô€€€lightening creams used in Durban, South Africa. Int J Dermatol 2012; 51: 51- 3. 23210963 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNine of the fifteen samples were manufactured in the EU, four in India, one in the UK, and one in Jamaica.
“Nine of the samples collected were manufactured in the EU, India manufactured four of the samples, the UK one and Jamaica one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenDeluxe Silken was manufactured in Jamaica.
“The sample of Deluxe Silken manufactured in Jamaica greatly exceeded the <1 μg/g value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTen of the fifteen samples originated from the EU.
“Only the EU has an outright ban on Arsenic and its compounds in cosmetics, and it was interesting to note that ten of the fifteen samples originated from the EU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataDetection limits were 0.17 μg/kg for mercury and 0.21 μg/kg for arsenic.
“Detection limits were determined to be 0.17 μg/kg for Mercury and 0.21 μg/kg for Arsenic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSpiked Papaya White samples supported method validation; recoveries ranged from 97.2% to 103.8% with standard deviations of <5%.
“The spiked Papaya White samples also supported the method validation.”
- Also stated in: § Method validation · plain
“In all cases, recoveries ranged from a low of 97.2% to a high of 103.8% with standard deviations of <5%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Method validation · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenSample selection was done to ensure the widest diversity of samples and to capture the most popularly purchased samples.
“Sample selection was done to ensure the widest diversity of samples and to capture the most popularly purchased samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The samples selected are representative of commonly used skin lightening creams in Trinidad and Tobago and the Caribbean.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe analytical method used in this study is both accurate and precise and is fit for purpose.
“The analytical method used in this study is both accurate and precise and is fit for purpose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe popularity of these skin lightening creams in the Caribbean region places the population at elevated risk of chronic mercury and arsenic poisoning and possibly acute mercury poisoning.
“The popularity of these skin lightening creams in the Caribbean region places the population at elevated risk of chronic Mercury and Arsenic poisoning and possibly acute Mercury Poisoning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLightly coloured individuals have a statistically higher chance of being hired than darker coloured persons.
“This is further supported by studies in hiring practices where lightly coloured individuals have a statistically higher chance of being hired than darker coloured persons.8”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Wade TJ Romano MJ Blue L. The effect of African American skin color on hiring preferences. J Appl Soc Psychol 2004; 34: 2550- 8. source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningChronic usage of skin lightening creams could lead to mercury and arsenic poisoning as well as physical, emotional and social complications.
“Chronic usage could lead to mercury and arsenic poisoning as well as physical, emotional and social complications resulting from such.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationArsenic is found in pigments used in cosmetics and is regulated by the USFDA.
“Currently, Arsenic is found in pigments used in cosmetics and is regulated by the USFDA.20”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Hepp NM Mindak WR Gasper JW Survey of cosmetics for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, mercury, and nickel content. J Cosmet Sci 2014; 65: 125- 45. 25043485
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSkin bleaching is more prevalent among women with higher academic achievement.
“Research have also found that skin bleaching is more prevalent among women with higher academic achievement,7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Peltzer K Pengpid S James C. The globalization of whitening: prevalence of skin lighteners (or bleachers) use and its social correlates among university students in 26 countries. Int J Dermatol 2016; 55: 165- 72. 26472662 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn these populations, a lighter complexion is deemed more beautiful, signifies a higher social status and enhanced economic mobility.
“In these populations, and among many others, a lighter complexion is deemed more beautiful, signifies a higher social status and enhanced economic mobility.4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Alghamdi K The use of topical bleaching agents among women: a crossô€€€sectional study of knowledge, attitude and practices. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010; 24: 1214- 9. 20236376 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLifelong exposure to arsenic levels as low as 10 μg/L in drinking water has been shown to elevate an individual's risk of cancer.
“Lifelong exposure to arsenic levels as low as 10 μg/L in drinking have been shown to elevate an individual’s risk of cancer.37”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Smith AH Lopipero PA Bates MN Steinmaus CM Arsenic epidemiology and drinking water standards. Science 2002; 296: 2145- 6. 12077388 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWomen of East Indian descent prefer men of a lighter complexion.
“In the case of men of East Indian decent, a recent study found that women of East Indian descent prefer men of a lighter complexion.10”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Utley TJ Darity W. India’s color complex: one day’s worth of matrimonials. Rev Black Polit Econ 2016; 43: 129. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudies show that skin bleaching is on the rise and is more prevalent among females.
“Studies show that skin bleaching is on the rise and is more prevalent among females.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Hunter ML Buying racial capital: skin-bleaching and cosmetic surgery in a globalized world. J Pan Afr Stud 2011; 4: 142- 64.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe use of skin bleaching creams in the Caribbean is not restricted to women only, but also to men.
“The use of skin bleaching creams in the Caribbean is not restricted to women only, but also to men who are seeking a lighter skin complexion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of regulation of cosmetics in the region could lead to severe health defects within the population and present burdens on both the health system and social support services of the region.
“Such lack of regulation could lead to severe health defects within the population and present burdens on both the health system and social support services of the region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cosmetics are not regulated in the region and manufacturers are not required by law to display the components of their products on the labels.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe popularity of skin lightening has always been high, and appears to be increasing with both men and women.
“The popularity of skin lightening has always been high, and appears to be increasing with both men and women.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationArsenic is present in a range of cosmetic products such as eye shadows, lotions and lipsticks.
“Arsenic is present in a range of cosmetic products such as eye shadows, lotions and lipsticks, and only the European Union is known to have strict regulations against the metal, banning it from use in cosmetics.21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] REGULATION (EC) No 1223/2009 of The European Parliament and of the Council Of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products, 1223 (2009).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe act of skin bleaching is very prominent in the Caribbean region and the diaspora of the Caribbean regions, as it is engrained in the culture.
“The act of skin bleaching is very prominent in the Caribbean region and the diaspora of the Caribbean regions, as it is engrained in the culture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Cosmetics are not regulated in the region and manufacturers are not required by law to display the components of their products on the labels.
“Cosmetics are not regulated in the region and manufacturers are not required by law to display the components of their products on the labels.”
“Cosmetics are not required by local laws to list all their ingredients so many preparations do not list their content of mercury or arsenic in the ingredient listing or package label, and researchers have found that many skin whitening products do contain some level of mercury although none were declared in the ingredient list or labelling.26”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many of the countries of the Caribbean region are either signatories to the Minamata Convention or are in the process of signing.
“Many of the countries of the Caribbean region are either signatories to the Minamata Convention or, are in the process of signing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The provisions of the Minamata Convention require that states regulate mercury containing products including cosmetics.
“The provisions of the convention require that states regulate mercury containing products including cosmetics.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Neither the USFDA nor the WHO have defined acceptable levels for Arsenic in cosmetics.
“Neither the USFDA nor the WHO have defined acceptable levels for Arsenic in cosmetics.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The samples selected are representative of commonly used skin lightening creams in Trinidad and Tobago and the Caribbean.
“Sample selection was done to ensure the widest diversity of samples and to capture the most popularly purchased samples.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Two different spectrophotometer models are specified
MinorThe equipment section says analysis used a Varian AA 800, while the mercury determination section says it used a Varian SpectrAA300.
“Analysis was performed using the Varian AA 800 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer equipped with a VGA 77 Vapor Generation Accessory and Ultra AA lamps.”
“Mercury was analysed using a Varian SpectrAA300 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer equipped with a VGA77 Hydride Generator Accessory, Mercury flow through quartz sample cell and Ultra AA lamps.”
Spiking concentrations are described differently
MinorThe first description assigns 50 Î1⁄4g/kg to mercury and 100 Î1⁄4g/kg to arsenic, respectively. The later description says both metals were spiked at both concentrations.
“Spiked recoveries were determined using Papaya White samples spiked with 50 μg/kg and 100 μg/kg Mercury and Arsenic respectively.”
“Spikes using a 10 μg/mL mixed Mercury and Arsenic working standard were prepared by adding an appropriate amount of standard to the sample to yield an increase of 50 μg/kg and 100 μg/kg of both Mercury and Arsenic.”
Cites
Naujokas, M. F., Anderson, B., Ahsan, H., Aposhian, H. V., Graziano, J. H., Thompson, C., & Suk, W. A. (2013) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1205875 · Cited by 1,372 · see citing works
Acute and chronic arsenic toxicity
Ratnaike, R. N. (2003) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pmj.79.933.391 · Cited by 1,175 · see citing works
Arsenic Epidemiology and Drinking Water Standards
Smith, A. H., Lopipero, P. A., Bates, M. N., & Steinmaus, C. M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072896 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Arsenic Exposure in Bangladesh
Rahman, M., Tondel, M. O., Ahmad, S. A., & Axelson, O. (1998) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009624 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Arsenic in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West Bengal, India
Mazumder, D. N. G., Haque, R., Ghosh, N., De, B. K., Santra, A. K., Chakraborti, D., & Smith, A. H. (2000) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/29.6.1047 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Ullah, H., Noreen, S., Fozia, Rehman, A., Waseem, A., Zubair, S., Adnan, M., & Ahmad, I. (2017) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.09.021 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Hsueh, Y.-M., Wu, W.-L., Huang, Y.-L., Chiou, H.-Y., Tseng, C.-H., & Chen, C.-J. (1998) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/s0021-9150(98)00178-6 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Widespread Use of Toxic Skin Lightening Compounds: Medical and Psychosocial Aspects
Ladizinski, B., Mistry, N., & Kundu, R. V. (2011) · Dermatologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.det.2010.08.010 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Chemometrics in Process Analytical Chemistry
Miller, C. E. (2005) · doi:10.1002/9780470988459.ch8 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Dlova, N. C., Hamed, S. H., Tsoka-Gwegweni, J., & Grobler, A. (2015) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.13556 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Hamann, C. R., Boonchai, W., Wen, L., Sakanashi, E. N., Chu, C.-Y., Hamann, K., Hamann, C. P., Sinniah, K., & Hamann, D. (2014) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.050 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
ALqadami, A., Abdalla, M., ALOthman, Z., & Omer, K. (2013) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph10010361 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Peltzer, K., Pengpid, S., & James, C. (2016) · International Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ijd.12860 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
McKelvey, W., Jeffery, N., Clark, N., Kass, D., & Parsons, P. J. (2011) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1002396 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Mercury Levels in Locally Manufactured Mexican Skin-Lightening Creams
Peregrino, C. P., Moreno, M. V., Miranda, S. V., Rubio, A. D., & Leal, L. O. (2011) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph8062516 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
A whitened face woman with nephrotic syndrome
Soo, Y. O.-Y., Chow, K.-M., Lam, C. W.-K., Lai, F. M.-M., Szeto, C.-C., Chan, M. H.-M., & Li, P. K.-T. (2003) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/ajkd.2003.50017 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
AlGhamdi, K. (2010) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03629.x · Cited by 61 · see citing works
(2014) · PubMed · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Agorku, E. S., Kwaansa-Ansah, E. E., Voegborlo, R. B., Amegbletor, P., & Opoku, F. (2016) · SpringerPlus · doi:10.1186/s40064-016-1967-1 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Copan, L., Fowles, J., Barreau, T., & McGee, N. (2015) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph120910943 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The Effect of African American Skin Color on Hiring Preferences<sup>1</sup>
Wade, T. J., Romano, M. J., & Blue, L. (2004) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01991.x · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Analysis of some selected toxic metals in registered herbal products manufactured in Nigeria
Adepoju-Bello (2012) · African Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.5897/ajb11.3961 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
(2012) · PubMed · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Skin‐lightening creams used in Durban, South Africa
Dlova, N. C., Hendricks, N. E., & Martincgh, B. S. (2012) · International Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05566.x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Al-Saleh, I., El-Doush, I., Shinwari, N., Al-Baradei, R., Khogali, F., & Al-Amodi, M. (2005) · Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology · doi:10.1081/cus-200046179 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
India's Color Complex: One Day's Worth of Matrimonials
Utley, T. J., & Darity, W. (2016) · The Review of Black Political Economy · doi:10.1007/s12114-016-9233-x · Cited by 25 · see citing works
'Fishy' Make-up on the Hook for Mercury Exposure: A Case Series
Drescher, O., Dewailly, E., Krimholtz, M., & Rutchik, J. (2014) · West Indian Medical Journal · doi:10.7727/wimj.2013.034 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Dórea, J. G. (2016) · International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.07.010 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Arbab A, 2010, Khartoum Pharm J, 13, 5
- Drescher O, 2013, W Indian Med J, 62, 770
- Hunter ML, 2011, J Pan Afr Stud, 4, 142
- Shankar PR, 2016, J Pak Assoc Dermatol, 17, 100
- CDC, 2012, MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep, 61, 33
- Hepp NM, 2014, J Cosmet Sci, 65, 125
- Li EP, 2008, ACR North American Advances
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Mohammed, T., Mohammed, E., & Bascombe, S.
- Affiliations
- University of the West Indies (TT)
- Corresponding author
- Mohammed, Terry
- ORCID
- Mohammed, Terry
- Venue
- Journal of Public Health Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-12-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1097-1097
- ISSN
- 2279-9036 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5736993
- OpenAlex
- W2763544274
- Semantic Scholar
- 5a942bff3e711e2e037d2afeaf3fc5f7fac91d64
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Public Health Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Journal of Public Health Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
- Keywords
- skin bleaching creams, mercury, arsenic, cosmetic safety, heavy metal contamination, mercury toxicity, arsenic toxicity, Trinidad and Tobago, Caribbean
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review